It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikesingh
Good analysis! Case closed!
“The bottom line is that, unless someone can show better evidence, I would say this was a bird zipping through the field of view, which explains why there were no witness reports of a 55 ft long UFO zipping past the monument.”
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
According to Bruce Maccabee, it's a freaking bird.
It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a ... bird(?)
“The bottom line is that, unless someone can show better evidence, I would say this was a bird zipping through the field of view, which explains why there were no witness reports of a 55 ft long UFO zipping past the monument.”
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Hey!!! What about according to cluckerspud, it's a bird?!
My word seemed to be no good here since the start, it produced
15 pages of frustration. hahahaa.
Originally posted by Razmear23
At first look I'd say it's a bird. But the speed of the object seems a bit quick for a bird, so it is possible it is a MAV or NAV surveillance drone.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
Originally posted by Razmear23
At first look I'd say it's a bird. But the speed of the object seems a bit quick for a bird, so it is possible it is a MAV or NAV surveillance drone.
And it continues...
For God's Sake...
Originally posted by Chadwickus
You bumped it so all the "read the first page only" crowd can jump in