It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by emsed1
So first our hands are tied and we are gagged in the name of promoting conspiracies and now we are being attacked with impunity by actual moderators.
Originally posted by Dr Love
Originally posted by emsed1
So first our hands are tied and we are gagged in the name of promoting conspiracies and now we are being attacked with impunity by actual moderators.
Where did I attack you? I asked a simple question, to verify if what that guy was saying was the same Shriner doctrine as other Shriners know it to be? (Yes. No. Somewhat....here are a few differences.....)
Peace
Originally posted by Dr Love
Are there any Shriners here who can verify this as Shriner doctrine, or is this guy just a mental patient who happens to be a Shriner?
Originally posted by emsed1
Why entitle the thread "Shriner claims to be Lucifer"? Why not "Elderly man claims to be Lucifer" or "American claims to be Lucifer" or "Christian claims to be Lucifer"?
Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
You should know by now that the masons are quite happy to talk about the brotherhood as long as it's on their terms and you don't ask too many cutting questions. If you do it's labelled as an attack and other masons then surround you in a feeding frenzy, protecting their fellow mason.
As someone who doesn't like freemasonry but is fascinated by the cult, sorry- brotherhood, every time I ask a question it desolves into name calling.
Originally posted by emsed1
I understand the need to liven things up through thoughtful discussion, but I think your motivation was to provoke Masons, especially in the light of recent threads.
It is exhausting to stay rational and try and address issues like this truthfully because questions are asked and answered, but then the answers are challenged as lies.
Masons look bad because we get poked and prodded and try to answer calmly and truthfully but the process never ends.
In my opinion I think it is improper for you to have started this thread as a Moderator. I think if you had put the 'mod' disclaimer around your post I would not be so upset, but as the same type of conspiracy theorist that sees untoward motivations in masons, I see an unsavory motivation on the part of ATS.
I understand the need to drive user-content as well, but for some reason it seems ok to disparage masonry while protecting other groups from baseless accusation.
Why entitle the thread "Shriner claims to be Lucifer"? Why not "Elderly man claims to be Lucifer" or "American claims to be Lucifer" or "Christian claims to be Lucifer"?