It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fox reporter: Bush ‘inherited the 9/11 attacks.

page: 3
4
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 20 2009 @ 02:05 PM
link   
reply to post by paxnatus
 



If it was not a warning document, as Rice insisted, then as Timothy Roemer put it, Why wouldn't it be made public then?
Snap. No one knows what it says, But what Rice says it does.




posted on Jan, 20 2009 @ 02:20 PM
link   
reply to post by GamerGal
 


What, specifically, would you do if you were President and were briefed by intelligence that there could possibly be a terrorist attack somewhere (anywhere) in our country in the coming months or years?

Just curious.



posted on Jan, 20 2009 @ 02:30 PM
link   
reply to post by RRconservative
 


Actually, though NewsMax has only a tenuous connection with the truth, on this occasion, they're reporting correctly.

What you fail to realise is that what you've posted supports the contention that OBL was a US security asset. Therefore, of course Clinton wouldn't have him arrested.

And to this day, the FBI don't have him on their "most wanted" list. Shortly before Sept 11, a CIA station chief even visited him in hospital, according to French intelligence.

Unfortunately, your partisan attitude blinds you to the real nature of your government.

And as for Bush "inheriting" 9/11... this kind of distortion is so common, it's a wonder people react to it any more. Wake up, sleepyheads. Your media lies to you.



posted on Jan, 20 2009 @ 03:26 PM
link   
Bush "inherited" 9/11 from Cheney...

But, well... Some still don't see the obvious connection there.



posted on Jan, 20 2009 @ 03:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
Might as well pop some popcorn and sit back and watch the fireworks. What you are witnessing is the, "It is Clinton's fault for all the mess we are going through" to start to counter act the, "it's all Bush's fault on why Obama can't come through on his promises" spiel that we will undoubtedly have to hear about for a year or more.

Just sit back relax and enjoy the ride your about to hear the most inane excuses ever on why Obama can't preform for the next 4 years.



That is unless there is another 9/11 style attack in the US. Then you may be able to sit back and watch history possibly repeat itself, again.

Judging by the way the last two presidential began(major attacks shortly after taking office) I would say its safe to say that we have a very big chance of this happening to Obamas administration sometime soon. Even VP Biden seems to think so, as do a lot of other people.



posted on Jan, 20 2009 @ 03:59 PM
link   
reply to post by TruthParadox
 


Well, since Condi and the others refuse to release it we only have speculation, and people pissed at Bush who read it. The ones mad at Bush say it gave details, like names and so forth. So, if I had the names, day, airlines, like what may have been in the memo, I would have stopped it.



posted on Jan, 20 2009 @ 04:20 PM
link   
No suprise there. Would fox do anything that did not put Bush up on a high horse no matter what. Watch, we have been going a couple years now with almost no coverage of the war. Now that obama is in office Fox is going to turn around and get into lets bash the president mode. We will be seeing alot of coverage on how bad the war is going now that a democrat is in charge.



posted on Jan, 20 2009 @ 11:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by GamerGal
reply to post by TruthParadox
 


Well, since Condi and the others refuse to release it we only have speculation, and people pissed at Bush who read it. The ones mad at Bush say it gave details, like names and so forth. So, if I had the names, day, airlines, like what may have been in the memo, I would have stopped it.

Reply to GamerGal

Was going to let this slide, but now you have referenced that same Left wing article again, and again and are not telling the whole story.

"The 9/11 Commission has asked that the August 6th memo be declassified so everyone can see what is in it. The Bush administration is, of course, dragging their feet. If it was not a warning document, as Rice insisted, then as Timothy Roemer put it, Why wouldn't it be made public then?

Update: The New York Times is reporting that the White House has agreed to release the August 6th Memo. When they will do so is anyone's guess..."

So they did agree to release the memo.

[edit on 01/12/2009 by paxnatus]



posted on Jan, 21 2009 @ 12:09 AM
link   
reply to post by paxnatus
 


Your own quote says "When they will do this..." So who knows if they actually did.



posted on Jan, 21 2009 @ 01:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by GamerGal
reply to post by paxnatus
 


Your own quote says "When they will do this..." So who knows if they actually did.


Not my quote! Your article their quote! You need to give the whole story not just the parts you like.



new topics

top topics



 
4
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join