Fox reporter: Bush ‘inherited the 9/11 attacks., page 3

reply to post by paxnatus

---

If it was not a warning document, as Rice insisted, then as Timothy Roemer put it, Why wouldn't it be made public then?

Snap. No one knows what it says, But what Rice says it does.

reply to post by GamerGal

---

What, specifically, would you do if you were President and were briefed by intelligence that there could possibly be a terrorist attack somewhere (anywhere) in our country in the coming months or years?

Just curious.

reply to post by RRconservative

---

Actually, though NewsMax has only a tenuous connection with the truth, on this occasion, they're reporting correctly.

What you fail to realise is that what you've posted supports the contention that OBL was a US security asset. Therefore, of course Clinton wouldn't have him arrested.

And to this day, the FBI don't have him on their "most wanted" list. Shortly before Sept 11, a CIA station chief even visited him in hospital, according to French intelligence.

Unfortunately, your partisan attitude blinds you to the real nature of your government.

And as for Bush "inheriting" 9/11... this kind of distortion is so common, it's a wonder people react to it any more. Wake up, sleepyheads. Your media lies to you.

reply to post by TruthParadox

---

Well, since Condi and the others refuse to release it we only have speculation, and people pissed at Bush who read it. The ones mad at Bush say it gave details, like names and so forth. So, if I had the names, day, airlines, like what may have been in the memo, I would have stopped it.

Originally posted by GamerGal
reply to post by TruthParadox

---

Well, since Condi and the others refuse to release it we only have speculation, and people pissed at Bush who read it. The ones mad at Bush say it gave details, like names and so forth. So, if I had the names, day, airlines, like what may have been in the memo, I would have stopped it.

Reply to GamerGal

Was going to let this slide, but now you have referenced that same Left wing article again, and again and are not telling the whole story.

"The 9/11 Commission has asked that the August 6th memo be declassified so everyone can see what is in it. The Bush administration is, of course, dragging their feet. If it was not a warning document, as Rice insisted, then as Timothy Roemer put it, Why wouldn't it be made public then?

Update: The New York Times is reporting that the White House has agreed to release the August 6th Memo. When they will do so is anyone's guess..."

So they did agree to release the memo.

[edit on 01/12/2009 by paxnatus]

reply to post by paxnatus

---

Your own quote says "When they will do this..." So who knows if they actually did.

Originally posted by GamerGal
reply to post by paxnatus

---

Your own quote says "When they will do this..." So who knows if they actually did.

Not my quote! Your article their quote! You need to give the whole story not just the parts you like.

Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 1 days ago with 18 member flags

Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags

Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags

Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags

Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags

Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags

Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: