It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
* Pound for pound, beef production generates greenhouse gases that contribute more than 13 times as much to global warming as do the gases emitted from producing chicken. For potatoes, the multiplier is 57.
* Beef consumption is rising rapidly, both as population increases and as people eat more meat.
* Producing the annual beef diet of the average American emits as much greenhouse gas as a car driven more than 1,800 miles.
The FAO report found that current production levels of meat contribute between 14 and 22 percent of the 36 billion tons of "CO2-equivalent" greenhouse gases the world produces every year. It turns out that producing half a pound of hamburger for someone's lunch a patty of meat the size of two decks of cards releases as much greenhouse gas into the atmosphere as driving a 3,000-pound car nearly 10 miles.
In truth, every food we consume, vegetables and fruits included, incurs hidden environmental costs: transportation, refrigeration and fuel for farming, as well as methane emissions from plants and animals, all lead to a buildup of atmospheric greenhouse gases. Take asparagus: in a report prepared for the city of Seattle, Daniel J. Morgan of the University of Washington and his co-workers found that growing just half a pound of the vegetable in Peru emits greenhouse gases equivalent to 1.2 ounces of CO2 as a result of applying insecticide and fertilizer, pumping water and running heavy, gas-guzzling farm equipment. To refrigerate and transport the vegetable to an American dinner table generates another two ounces of CO2-equivalent greenhouse gases, for a total CO2 equivalent of 3.2 ounces.
But that is nothing compared to beef
In 1999 Susan Subak, an ecological economist then at the University of East Anglia in England, found that, depending on the production method, cows emit between 2.5 and 4.7 ounces of methane for each pound of beef they produce. Because methane has roughly 23 times the global-warming potential of CO2, those emissions are the equivalent of releasing between 3.6 and 6.8 pounds of CO2 into the atmosphere for each pound of beef produced.
Originally posted by FredT
How about carbon offsets for meat consumption? Id be willing to pay that.
Originally posted by FredT
Carbon offsets do no mean planted trees per say. Money can be funneled into other carbon reducing measures like wind power, solar, tidal power etc. or the research for them etc.
Are you simply advocating the entire elimination of meat products from our food chain? Sounds like a PETA thing to me.
Originally posted by peacejet
reply to post by Solomons
Hi there, the plan is good, but, I dont think it will feasible on a large scale and also, it might contain some genetic materials and chemicals that might affect us, who knows.
Originally posted by peacejet
And I do not mean elimination of meat products, I said that the current artificial raising process is the problem.
Originally posted by PrepareForTheWorst
Isn't the new PC name for it "climate change"? Regardless, please send some of your global warming up here since it has been -40 and below for the last few weeks. Good thing my wood stove works so well!
You know, humans cause quite a bit of methane gas as well. Should we eliminate those pesky critters as well?
Other than what's obvious from your post, what would your suggestion be to curb this so called "global warming"?
Originally posted by Solomons
Anyway,im more worried about the methane trapped under the perma frosts in siberia,its melting right now and is around the size of north america,no one knows exactly but its about 70 to 400 billion tons of methane.100 billion tons of methane is the equivalent to 2 trillion tons of Co2,even if we completely stopped releasing Co2 tomorrow it will still melt and we will all still face sever weather changes,worldwide famines especially in thrid world countries etc