It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Was an ATS thread just removed and classified as Top Secret by the US government?

page: 2
4
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hellmutt
reply to post by interestedalways
 


The article was published on August 15, 1988


Ah to be in high school again. :

Not really..........




posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by FredT
Ah to be in high school again. :


Didn't you say that those were the best 7 years of your life?



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by FredT

Originally posted by Hellmutt
reply to post by interestedalways
 


The article was published on August 15, 1988


Ah to be in high school again. :

Not really..........


Well, geez................


Russians Monitor a Nuclear Test in Nevada

Published: March 27, 1992


How come it says this?

I'm a little confused!

I would love to be the age of a high schooler, without being in school of course!

edit to add the date of the article


New York Times

Saturday, January 17, 2009



Archives


[edit on 17-1-2009 by interestedalways]



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:38 PM
link   
reply to post by interestedalways
 


That's strange... when I click it, it says "Published: August 15, 1988"...



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hellmutt
reply to post by interestedalways
 


That's strange... when I click it, it says "Published: August 15, 1988"...


Yep, you are right, too!


Published: August 15, 1988


And the header on your link says World, whereas the first link said Archives.

Maybe there is more oddness to this afterall!

We are both right! I like it like that!



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:42 PM
link   
query.nytimes.com...


The 23 Russian scientists were present as part of a 1990 agreement allowing scientists of the former Soviet Union and the United States to monitor certain tests. It was the second test the Russians have monitored in the United States.


query.nytimes.com...


For the first time, teams of Soviet scientists have converged on the nuclear test site in the Nevada desert.


One link says Soviets Prepare for Verification at Nevada.............

The other says Russians Monitor a Nuclear Test site in Nevada!

Looks like it happened twice, but why print two different articles on the same day?

[edit on 17-1-2009 by interestedalways]



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:45 PM
link   
Lol, intrepid come on now, that is bordering on cruel.
So yeah, I could have just said nothing and watched the crazed speculation. But the second I saw this thread I u2u'd OP. Party pooper me.
But you know me, I play things straight up. Sowwy.



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 


Nah man, stuff happens. We've all done it. It's Sat. night, let's just have fun with it.



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:53 PM
link   
reply to post by interestedalways
 


One says "Russians" (1992) and the other one says "Soviet" (1988)...



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hellmutt
reply to post by interestedalways
 


One says "Russians" (1992) and the other one says "Soviet" (1988)...


Hmmmm.............

Interesting!

Oh, well...............I'm over it!

*smiles*



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 10:56 PM
link   
reply to post by interestedalways
 


en.wikipedia.org...


The Russian Federation was founded following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991




edit to add:

and regarding the Berlin wall...:

en.wikipedia.org...


The wall separated East Germany from West Germany for more than 25 years, from the day construction began on August 13, 1961 until it was opened on November 9th, 1989.


[edit on 17 Jan 2009 by Hellmutt]



posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 11:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Hellmutt
 



That is an interesting bit of fairly recent history.

Thanks for clarifying that. It does make a bit more sense!





posted on Jan, 17 2009 @ 11:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hellmutt
reply to post by interestedalways
 


One says "Russians" (1992) and the other one says "Soviet" (1988)...


The issue of the missing thread has been resolved. However, as I started to read the articles I found some information that is interesting in and of itself.

It looks like there was a growing divsion within the Soviet Union's government in 1988, simply because there were two Soviet teams monitoring the tests in different locations.

The 1992 article mirrors the fact that the Soviet Union did indeed split up shortly thereafter.



The goal is to find ways to insure that both sides are adhering to the 1974 treaty limiting the size of underground nuclear explosions.

The fact that there are two Soviet teams in and around Nevada reflects the opposing views of how to best reach that goal.

Both sides examine everything the other does in great detail, said Joseph C. Behne, director of the test for the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. ''They were allowed to examine the cannister closely before we put it in the ground,'' Mr. Behne said, referring the nuclear device. ''It is made of steel and painted red, white and blue. The Soviets reminded us that those were the colors of the Russian royal family.''

query.nytimes.com...


[edit on 18-1-2009 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Jan, 18 2009 @ 12:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by interestedalways
I would love to be the age of a high schooler, without being in school of course!


“That’s what I love about these high school girls, man. I get older, they stay the same age. Yes they do.”





posted on Jan, 18 2009 @ 05:03 AM
link   
wait...

if you use the nine, and the one, then divide the 8 by itself.... then

9 - 1 (8/8)=1 = 9 - 11 OMG!


(just kidding people ..lol, conspiricy's ? hehe)



posted on Jan, 18 2009 @ 10:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Geez, its amazing how people jump to outrageous conclusions...

It was probably removed because it wasnt excatly new news, unless you count 1988 as recent

Sheesh


Are you saying that if something was leaked on here that the alphabet agencies didnt want,they wouldnt take it down? I think they would,thats the problem with the internet instead of documents or face to face,the NSA,CIA can easily infiltrate here and take anything down they thought was too much information.



posted on Jan, 18 2009 @ 10:30 AM
link   
This thread could serve as a great example of 'How Conspiracies are Formed', in reference to the title of it, and the believability of it by some, until of course someone came forward with the correct answer.



posted on Jan, 18 2009 @ 10:59 AM
link   
reply to post by TrueAmerican
 

I'm glad you made the mistake. It was information I didn't know. Now I know.

During those years my motto was to party hardy and I sometimes
missed the news.


Something good did come of your mishap.



posted on Jan, 18 2009 @ 01:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Solomons
Are you saying that if something was leaked on here that the alphabet agencies didnt want,they wouldnt take it down? I think they would,thats the problem with the internet instead of documents or face to face,the NSA,CIA can easily infiltrate here and take anything down they thought was too much information.


I think they are monitoring the site and that they wouldn't hesitate to remove a topic that they felt was too hot too handle.

How many .gov ip's come to this site?

[edit on 18-1-2009 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Jan, 19 2009 @ 06:52 PM
link   
I am still a little more that curious as to why those two stories were ran in two separate sections of the NYTIMES. It seems one was in the World section and one in Archives.

What would prompt them to do that?




top topics



 
4
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join