Pregnant for 60 years since 1948, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 17-1-2009 @ 03:56 PM by Hyzera

Pregnant for 60 years since 1948


www.thesun.co.uk
STUNNED doctors discovered a woman complaining of stomach ache had been carrying her unborn child for 60 YEARS.

Huang Yijun, 92, of Huangjiaotan, southern China, was told by medics in 1948 that her child had died in the womb.

Doctors demanded £100 to remove it, so she walked away.

She said: "It was a huge sum at the time - more than the whole family earned in several years so I did nothing and ignored it.”
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 03:56 PM by Hyzera

Woah. This is crazy! How could she ignore a dead fetus that's been sitting inside her womb for 60 years?! What could've been preserving the fetus for so long that it didn't decay?

Consultant Xu Xianming, director of the Obstetrics and Gynecology department at the hospital, said: "Normally a dead foetus would decay. It’s very rare that Huang can be so healthy."


www.thesun.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)

[edit on 1/17/2009 by Hyzera]


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 04:18 PM by RFBurns
reply to post by ravenshadow13



Look forward to the info! Should be interesting.

2nd line

Cheers!!!!


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 04:55 PM by Pauligirl
Lithopedion formation occurs when the dead fetus undergoes calcification rather than spontaneous resorption

rad.usuhs.mil...
nonviable chronic ectopic pregnancy can result in formation of a lithopedion (litho = stone; pedion = child or "stone baby").
Lithopedion formation typically occurs in 1:20,000 pregnancies with fewer than 300 cases reported in the medical literature over the past 400 years. The condition was first described in a treatise by Albucasis in the 10th century AD. While the etiology is related to demise of an ectopic pregnancy, a lithopedion is more commonly encountered with a larger ectopic pregnancy, as can be seen from abdominal pregnancies. When the fetus is too large to be reabsorbed by the body (usually gestational age > 14 weeks), the fetus and/or its covering membranes calcify, shielding the mother's body from the degenerating fetal tissue.

A calcified extrauterine fetus can have the following forms: (i) lithokelyphos (litho = rock, kelyphos = shell): only the ovular membrane is calcified and the fetus can be in different stages of decomposition; (ii) lithokelyphopedion: both are calcified, i.e. fetus and ovular membrane, as in this case; (iii) lithopedion: only the fetus is calcified. It is not unusual for a lithopedion to remain undiagnosed for decades. A patient with a calcified extrauterine pregnancy may present with abdominal pain, lower abdominal pressure, or constipation. Based on reported cases, the patient's age at the time of diagnosis ranges from 23 to 100 years; 67% of the patients are over the age 40 years. The estimated lead time to diagnosis ranges from 4 years to 60 years.

Fetal demise occurred between a gestational age of three to six months in 20% of the reported cases, between seven and eight months in 27%, and at full term in 43%. The earliest lithopedion found was in an archaeological excavation, dating to 1100 BC, antedating the first clinical description by 2100 years. Based on reported cases, the patient's age at the time of diagnosis varies widely, with 67% of patients over fourty years of age.


another case
jkms.kams.or.kr...

So it appears that the baby doesn't grow where it supposed to, so any pregnancy after that can appear to be normal?

Wow...something new everyday.


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 05:09 PM by ravenshadow13
This is from William's Obstetrics:


In late abortions after the fetus has attained considerable size, several outcomes are possible. The retained fetus may undergo maceration. In some circumstances, the bonets of the skull collapse, the abdomen becomes distended with a blood-stained fluid, and the entire fetus takes on a dull reddish color. At the same time, the skin softens and peels off at the slightes touch, leaving behind the corium. The internal organs degenerate, becoming friable and losing their capacity for taking up the usual histologic stains. The amnionic fluid may be absorbed when the fetus becomes compressed upon itself and dessicated to form a fetus compressus. Occasionally, the fetus becomes so dry and compressed that it resembles parchment, the so-called fetus papyraceus.


It also says that most women with an aborted fetus will go into labor spontaneously, but not always.

It also says that one of the greatest risks for women who carry a dead fetus is severe coagulation changes.

Here's some more info:


Mummification and the formation of a lithopedion occasionally ensue, and the calcified product of conception may be carried for years without producing symptoms until it causes dystocia in a subsequent pregnancy or symptoms from pressure. There are instanes in which a period of 20 to 30 years elapsed before removal of a lithopedion at operation or autopsy. Much more rarely, the fetus is converted into a yellowish, greasy mass to which the term adipocere is applied.


A lithopedion is a dead, calcified fetus that is too large to be reabsorbed into the body.

Here is the MLA citation for the source, I typed the quotes in by hand:
Pritchard, Jack A, and Paul C MacDonald. Williams Obstetrics. 1930. 15th ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1976.


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 05:11 PM by ravenshadow13
reply to post by Hyzera



Yeah, pretty much. But only in small fetuses.
To the ectopic information- the pregnancy doesn't need to be ectopic to become a lithopedion.
Just like a fetus doesn't need to be ectopic to be spontaneously aborted.
The information from Williams Obstetrics that I put in my post explains it perfectly, and mom says the sections that I included are what she had been referring to. Yay Midwives!


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 05:13 PM by ravenshadow13
reply to post by Pauligirl



Yeah, this info doesn't apply to the OP. The case that the thread is about is not extrauterine (in an ovary or fallopian tube or in the peritoneal cavity). It seems that the fetus was located in the uterus, which the article you cited doesn't talk about.


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 05:14 PM by bodrul
reply to post by gimme_some_truth



not really
this was on discovery channel a few weeks ago
except it was an egyption woman i think
might be another middle eastern country



reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 05:36 PM by ravenshadow13
reply to post by cognoscente



Hahaha. I bet he knew, I assume, because she kind of looked it...
And it's not like it was right... there... her cervix still contained it within her uterus.
Still kind of gross.


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 05:46 PM by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by bodrul
reply to
post by gimme_some_truth



not really
this was on discovery channel a few weeks ago
except it was an egyption woman i think
might be another middle eastern country


Not really what?

The documentary I saw was on years ago. not a few weeks ago. She was "pregnant" (if you can call it that) for 46 years and they removed it eventually and it was a calcified fetus... the case in the sun sounds similiar to what happened in real life and that is why I think they based there story on the real life case. There was a case where it did happen. IMO the suns articel is not that case...

The sun IS a tabloid.... Not very legit... if you doubt that perhaps check out there articles about a gnome that is roaming the streets scaring children....

There was a similiar case in real life and I provied the links....

So when you say not really, what exactly do you disagree with? Are you saying that the sun is legit? are you saying that it never happened? I must admit, I have no idea what you are getting at..... Help me out?

[edit on 17-1-2009 by gimme_some_truth]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 2 days ago with 80 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 3 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 15 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 2 days ago with 48 member flags
Is it morally wrong to take a life? Not really, say bioethicists
  Posted 9 days ago with 37 member flags