Reinhardt believes something is very suspicious about the recent plane crash, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 17-1-2009 @ 06:02 PM by boaby_phet
reply to post by Intothepitwego


o.......k

you really read to much into that post, i was just saying its a rare occurance and nothing bad happened except the accident.

i mean rare as in that combination of situations (a double bird strike taking out 2/all engines on a passegner jet over a massive city and the piliot managing to pull off the perfect water landing and noone was killed) has like 1 in a 10000000 chance of actualy happening... i would say thats pretty dam RARE!, sorry, i should have said "improbable".


Im very confused though, are you trying to say their totally IS a conspiricy here going unnoticed?

(and again, no need to go so deep into my ranblings! lol.. i fear for peoples sanity trying to seperate my ramblings sometimes.)


dgtempe - your dam right, but not litrely , its more like "no way, ive won £10000..I CANT BELIEVE IT" .. where its clearly true, more disbelief

[edit on 17-1-2009 by boaby_phet]


reply posted on 19-1-2009 @ 06:53 PM by dgtempe
reply to post by titorite
Ummm...it was an afterthought to my previous post.

You want to think conspiracy? Suit yourself. BUSH ordered the plane down!!!!!!
Better yet, Obama did!
Too bad the pilot knew his stuff, ha?

Please, theres one too many conspiracies already. As far as reprimanding me for a one liner,




reply posted on 19-1-2009 @ 09:30 PM by Intothepitwego
Originally posted by titorite

Seriously though I agree that the story sounds suspect...

Its a feel good story with timing too perfect..

And I understand Bank of America employees were the majority on that flight... Maybe one of them was sent a message about whistle blowing?

Who knows ask them. THe passangers I mean not the captian.


OK, I can play along. What parts are suspect? Today is January 19 and you can feel free to get in that river and find the missing parts. When you do, please present your evidence that it was not birds flying into the engine.

What we have here is a plane that was disabled. Happens all the time.
We have birds flying into the engines. Happens all the time.
Said plane goes down. Happens all the time.
Pilot saves everyone on top of a river in NYC in the middle of the coldest few months of the year. Not such a common occurance.

So...what is the conspiracy? Was someone trying to kill a few people from BoA? What percentage of the people in the company were on that plane that their loss would do anything for anyone other than open up positions inside the company? What would have been the motive, ultimate goal, incentive to pull any of this off?

I understand that this is a conspiracy site and all but you are going to need more than a rescued disabled plane and live passengers to convince me that anything unusual happened.

Tell you what, if you are willing to get into that river and get those engines before the middle of February, I will gladdly tag along and wath from someplace warm and inside. I promise.


reply posted on 19-1-2009 @ 09:49 PM by AceOfAces
reply to post by phinubian


im sorry but i have to agree...

it was birds...they migrated for winter...this is a known fact...canadian geese!

i dont see why the plane going down would benefit anyone truthfully...plus it didnt seem as if anyone important was on that flight...overall i'd be with you as a conspiracist but this one just doesnt deserve the time...

its a clean case- opened and closed.


reply posted on 19-1-2009 @ 10:51 PM by way2slo
Hmm anyone else find this interesting?

www.cnn.com...

Two days before US Airways Flight 1549 crashed into the Hudson River, passengers on the same route and same aircraft say they heard a series of loud bangs and the flight crew told them they could have to make an emergency landing, CNN has learned.

Steve Jeffrey of Charlotte, North Carolina, told CNN he was flying in first class Tuesday when, about 20 minutes into the flight, "it sounded like the wing was just snapping off."

"The red lights started going on. A little pandemonium was going on," Jeffrey recalled.

He said the incident occurred over Newark, New Jersey, soon after the plane -- also flying as Flight 1549 -- had taken off from LaGuardia Airport in New York.

"It seemed so loud, like luggage was hitting the side but times a thousand. It startled everyone on the plane," Jeffrey said. "We started looking at each other. The stewardesses started running around. They made an announcement that 'everyone heard the noise, we're going to turn around and head back to LaGuardia and check out what happened.'

"I fly about 50 to 60 times per year, and I've never heard a noise so loud," he said. "It wasn't turbulence, it wasn't luggage bouncing around. It was just completely like the engine was thrown against the side of the plane. It just -- it didn't shake the plane but it shook you out of the seat when you're drifting off, it really woke you up. And when it happened again, everyone just started looking at each other and there was a quiet murmuring around the plane, and you could feel the tension rising just in looking.

"I remember turning to my [business] partner and saying, 'I hope you got everything in order back home, life insurance and everything, because that didn't sound good.' "

Jeffrey said he sent a text message to his wife about a "scary, scary noise on the plane. Doesn't sound right. They're flying back to LaGuardia to check it out. I'll call you when we land. I love you."

He added, "About 10 minutes later when we never made the turn, we kept going, that's when the pilot came on and explained -- I wish I could remember the words -- I remember him using air, compression and lock -- I'm not sure the right order, but he made it sound like the air didn't get to the engine and it stalled the engine out, which he said doesn't happen all the time but it's not abnormal."

Expert Aviation Consulting, an Indianapolis, Indiana, private consulting firm that includes commercial airline pilots on its staff, said the plane that landed in the Hudson was the same one as Flight 1549 from LaGuardia two days earlier. PhotoSee images from the rescue in last week's crash »

"EAC confirms that US Airways ship number N106US flew on January 13, 2009, and January 15, 2009, with the same flight number of AWE 1549 from New York's LaGuardia Airport to Charlotte Douglas [International] Airport in North Carolina," Expert Aviation said in a statement to CNN.

The company said it checked with contacts in the aviation industry to confirm that it was the same plane.

The National Transportation Safety Board released the tail number of the downed Airbus A-320, which is N106US.

NTSB spokesman Peter Knudsen said as part of its investigation into the Hudson River crash, it will be looking at all maintenance activities, but has no indications of any anomalies or any malfunctions in the aircraft, so far in the investigation.

The Federal Aviation Administration referred CNN to US Airways.

US Airways would not confirm that the Flight 1549 that took off January 13 was the same plane that splashed into the Hudson two days later.

Valerie Wunder, a US Airways spokeswoman, said: "US Air is working with the National Transportation Safety Board in this investigation." She would not comment on any other details, including Tuesday's flight, though she did confirm US Airways is looking into it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



I finally solved a great mystery! I think I see now...
  Posted 19 days ago with 72 member flags
Finally! MSM Coverage - Legal Challenges to Fed - The End is Near
  Posted 18 days ago with 48 member flags
‘Barcode everyone at birth’
  Posted 4 days ago with 20 member flags
Pentagon Source Alludes to Martial Law Around July 1st, 2012
  Posted 3 days ago with 19 member flags
FBI Seize Email server, then return it
  Posted 16 days ago with 16 member flags
Bilderberg Scheme To Save The Euro
  Posted 12 days ago with 9 member flags