It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Res Ipsa
...I know I am hoping or asking too much here...but when "you" the debunkers show up....take a new approach please....I ask that you don't pick and choose which point the OP made to debunk because the smoking gun does not exist in just one of the elements or situations but ALL of them combined.....so if you plan on shooting the OP down....have answers for every one of the claims.....did I make any sense?
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by thedman
As a target Indian Point is much easier to hit than the buildings were, it really doesn't matter about the other stuff as you can see from this:
Are you seriously trying to tell us that two airliners slamming into this area wouldn't have a greater strategic effect than hitting the towers? At a minimum you knock the plant offline and cause a massive panic over the possibility of radioactive leakage. The chances of causing catastrophic failure are vastly higher here than at the WTC, from a preplanning point of view.
[edit on 17-1-2009 by apacheman]
Originally posted by mmiichael
In an ATS EXCLUSIVE
Dancing Israelis were guys who got in deep trouble with a company headquarted in the WTC. They were on their way to a 9 AM meeting knowing the evidence prepared was going to send them into bankruptcy.
Though it has been shown to have been made up by Muslim pseudo-reporting, Jews were not in the WTC when it was it because the time was 8:43 and the Jewish management personnel only arrive in their offices 9-10 AM.
But keep trying guys and examine that footage some more.
Originally posted by Ex_MislTech
If you would have watched the entire video you would see said
Israeli's on israeli TV admit they were sent there to doument the event.
Guess you skipped that part of the video, lol.
In its court papers, Swiss Re shows how Silverstein first tried to buy just $1.5 billion in property damage and business-interruption coverage. When his lenders objected, he discussed buying a $5 billion policy. Ultimately, he settled on the $3.5 billion figure, which was less than the likely cost of rebuilding
Larry Silverstein, president of Silverstein Properties, has said his actual losses on Sept. 11, 2001, amount to $8.2 billion, including $5.7 billion for the twin 110-story towers, retail property at the site and buildings 4 and 5, which were also destroyed
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
And none of the truthers have anything to say about the insurance, the dogs, the Israelis or the put options??? I wonder why that is.....
I mean, they seemed shot in the butt with themselves when they posted those items in this thread. You would think they would try to come up with SOMETHING to rebut the explanations.......I know its hard for them to keep up their fairy tales when the truth is posted but sheesh..I expected something......
Originally posted by lostbug
Just a reminder that random things do happen, the FEMA repositioning probably wasn't due to foreknowledge. Back in the dark ages (1989) there was a plane crash in Sioux City, Iowa where there happened to be a rapid response team doing drills. Wikipedia article about the crash
The incident occurred when the Iowa Air National Guard was on duty at Sioux Gateway Airport, allowing for 285 trained personnel to assist with triage and evacuation of the injured.
No one that I'm aware of has said that this was due to foreknowledge of the crash.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by apacheman
The Hudson River at Indian Point is ringed with mountains, the river also
twists in several hairpin bends in the area - now explain how one flys
a 767 on the deck to strike the building. The contention has always
been that the hijackers couldn't fly a plane well enough to hit the
Pentagon, which is a massive building - onr of the biggest in the worls
It is in a open field with nothing for hundreds of yards around it. How does one fly a plane on the deck in such terrain?