It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Moon rocks delivered to Earth by Apollo astronauts held a mystery that has plagued scientists since the 1970s: Why were the lunar rocks magnetic?
Originally posted by Amaxium
reply to post by theresult
Yeah, we know the concept. However you cannot just magnetize everything. Try that trick with a bit of plastic and nothing will happen.
They are stating that the moon does not have the iron that earth does. Unless there is some other unknown metal the moon has which can be magnetized by the method you mentioned.
Originally posted by "mayank"
Earth's rotating, iron core produces the planet's magnetic field. But the moon does not have such a setup.
Originally posted by thymisou
I heard that when NASA landed there they did a sound-measurement something, where you place a transmitter and two receivers at the tops of an equilateral triangle, fire a sound wave and measure delays/distortions etc and from that you can get good hints at what lies underneath you.
So, the story goes that when they did that, the echoes wouldn't stop for 8 hours, indicating that the moon is hollow and metallic in composition.
The Moon rings like a bell when struck by a large object.
The first man-made crash directed at the Moon that could be detected by a seismometer occurred after the Apollo 12 astronauts had returned to the CSM and the LM ascent stage was sent smashing into the Moon's surface. The shock waves of this impact surprised the scientists - the Moon vibrated for over 55 minutes!! Also, the kinds of signals recorded by the seismometers were utterly different from any ever received before, starting with small waves, gaining in size to a peak, and then lasting for incredibly long periods of time. A seismic wave took 7 to 8 minutes to reach the peak of impact energy and then gradually decreased in amplitude over a period that lasted almost an hour. It was claimed that even after an hour the minutest reverberations had still not stopped.
When the Apollo 12 LM hit the lunar surface at 6,048 kilometers per hour, 72 kilometers from the landing site, digging an estimated 9 meter wide crater, the results were astonishing. All 3 seismometers in the package recorded the impact, which set up a sequence of reverberations lasting nearly an hour. Nothing like this had ever been measured on Earth.
The LM impact occurred at 1617 USCST November 20 1969. A news conference had been scheduled to begin at 1630, and when it did start, the Moon was still "ringing" as the scientists - all of them seismic experts - arrived at the news center from their laboratories.
Maurice Ewing, co-head of the seismic experiment, told the afternoon crowd of the unexpected event, informing them that the Moon was still ringing. He confessed he was at a loss to explain why the Moon behaved so strangely. "As for the meaning of it," Ewing announced, "I'd rather not make an interpretation right now. But it is as though one had struck a bell, say, in the belfry of a church a single blow and found that the reverberation from it continued for 30 minutes." As he spoke the reverberations continued on for another 25 minutes.
Dr Ross Taylor, a lunar scientist who had been on the team to examine the Apollo 11 samples in Houston, explains why the Moon rang for so long, "This was one of those extraordinary things. When you had the impact of these things on the Moon, unlike a terrestrial earthquake, which dies away quickly, the shock waves continued to reverberate around the Moon for a period of an hour or more, and this is attributed to the extremely dry nature of the lunar rock. As far as we know there is no moisture on the Moon, nothing to damp out these vibrations. The Moon’s surface is covered with rubble and this just transmits these waves without them being damped out in any way as they are on Earth. Basically, it’s a consequence of the Moon being extremely dry."
uanews.org...
Study of Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake Yields New Insights
By Mari N. Jensen
May 25, 2005
Initially seismologists didn't realize the magnitude of the earthquake, said Beck. "Because it was so big, it was really hard to measure the size of this earthquake."
Initial estimates had put the earthquake at a magnitude 9.0. The new analysis estimates the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake as at least 9.1 and possibly as high as 9.3.
The ground shook more than 100 times harder during the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake than during California's 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. That earthquake--an event that caused major destruction from Santa Cruz to the San Francisco Bay Area--was only magnitude 6.9.
Some of the confounding aspects of the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake were its long duration and huge areal extent. However the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake covered so much ground and lasted so long that the different types of earthquake waves kept overlapping at the recording stations, complicating the data analysis.
Moreover, the slowness and duration of the quake were astounding, Beck said. Its average speed was 1.25 miles (two kilometers) a second, which is slower than most earthquakes.
The earthquake made the entire Earth reverberate. She said, "The Earth rang for days -- here in Tucson."
Originally posted by Amaxium
They are stating that the moon does not have the iron that earth does. Unless there is some other unknown metal the moon has which can be magnetized by the method you mentioned.