It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LeaderOfProgress
I have contacted them and am now waiting on a response. I will try again monday. I really don't think that they are into answering questions on the weekend but the could i guess. As for those who posted that Oklahoma is kind of a backwards state, I couldn't agree more. Could it be some one that has alterior motives that tuned me in, yes. Does that make it any better, not really. Like I have said in posts before, I might still be under investigation, I might not. I don't know the answers to anything yet but I am still looking for them.
Originally posted by moniker
Originally posted by Harassment101
So watch your back, get a lawyer.
As if a lawyer that would help. Those guys (the Government types, not the lawyers) are acting very much like the mob.
Originally posted by yellowcard
You can get your FBI record etc, through the freedom of information act
Originally posted by jibeho
You are playing people for fools. When the fool is really you. Your story doesn't make any sense and you haven't answered any question posed to you by other posters. Your only answer is "I dunno"
Move on.
Originally posted by Electro38
What is this "electronic torture" stuff I see popping up in this thread?
The gov. is electronically torturing people? For what gain?
I have a hard time wondering why the gov would electronically torture little people/working people living small uneventful lives for what, their political views?
And yet, the gov seems so inept at even finding some of it's greatest enemies.
How does this "electronic torturing" work?
(Now if you tell me they're doing via TV/cable programming, radio and pop music and sitcoms, I absolutely agree. There's something going on with that stuff, it's just not right. I'm serious.)
MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUND USE AGAINST HUMANS
The microwave irradiation of the American Embassy in Moscow received little publicity until the winter of 1976 instillation of protective screening, but irradiation was known since 1953.34 Original frequencies were 2.56-4.1 GHz with additional intermittent 0.6-9.5 GHz signals being permanent by 1975 in a wide band frequency hopping[h] consistent pattern with one signal pulsating. The irradiation was directional from nearby buildings and modulated. Complaint to the Soviets had no avail, but the signals disappeared in January 1979 "reportedly as a result of a fire in one or more of the buildings." [159] A 9-11 GHz signal recurred in 1988.[160] Observed frequencies are basically within the microwave hearing spectrum, and pulsation is required. Psychiatric cases occurred during the exposure period, though no epidemiologic relationship was revealed with fully a quarter of the medical records unavailable, and comparison with other Soviet Bloc posts.159 The CIA had Dr. Milton Zaret review medical Soviet microwave literature to determine the purpose of the irradiation. He concluded the Russians "believed the beam would modify the behavior of the personnel." [161] In 1976 the post was declared unhealthful and pay raised 20% 140
The most documented citizen microwave irradiation was of peace protesters at Greenham Common American Air Force Base in Berkshire England, who prompted investigation of unusual symptoms.[162] Radiation measurements exhibited microwaves with symptom experience up to a hundred times the background level, and rose sharply on protests nearer the base.160 Symptoms became pronounced on cruise missile transport, a protest focus.160 Recorded were wide ranging complaints: skin burns; 'severe' headaches; drowsiness; temporary paralysis; incoordinated speech; two late (5 mos.) spontaneous abortions; an apparent circulatory failure; and unlike usual menstrual synchronization, irregular or postmenopausal menstruation. The symptom complex fits well with electromagnetic exposure syndrome 160 It has also been reported that some of the women 'heard voices.'[163] The base closed finally in 1991.
Criminal directed energy weapon use has been reported in Germany.[164] In a number of cases there is similarity of circumstances, complaints, and symptoms. In at least one case microwave fields have been measured with exclusion of the usual sources (cell phone towers, etc.)[165] Plans for construction of a crude device from a microwave oven are sold.164
Measurement of non-ionizing radiation fields in the vicinity of an Australian victim is described.[166] The intensity ranged from 7 mV in an adjacent room to 35 mV next to the head. The victim suffered from multiple personality disorder attributed to ritual abuse, and claimed an implant with radiological evidence.
Ultrasound behavioral influence technology use in Northern Ireland is cited [167] The device could focus on one person; and utilized ultrasound cancellation like those patented. It was employed in Vietnam by the Americans, and is known as the squawk box. Mentioned infrasound frequency (ultrasound carrier directed) is like Loos 1/25/00 patent, with psychological effects summarized as 'spooky.' More detail by a defense journalist is quoted: "When the two frequencies mix in the human ear they become intolerable. Some people exposed to the device are said to feel giddy or nauseous and in extreme cases they faint. Most people are intensely annoyed by the device and have a compelling wish to be somewhere else." [168] British police inventories list the specific device, though a spokesman denied use.160
Sophisticated behavioral influence capability is confirmed by ex-intelligence officers. Julianne McKinney, Director of The National Security Alumni Electronic Surveillance Project is prominent. This is a largely classified employee victim study with internal voice transmission avowal.[169]
Originally posted by dragonridr
Just so you know many items use 2.5ghz including cordless phones. And the us emabassy you mentioned was talking about listening devices that were planted into the building during construction. It was by no means some microwave torture device in fact if you want to make a wireless microphone all you have to do is google it. So do a little research on radio frequencies oh and just so you know microwaves do not travel through buildings.
The ethical aspects of the exposure of US Foreign Service personnel and employees at the U.S. embassy in Moscow, Russia, to microwave radiation from Soviet sources was discussed. Those exposed apparently suffered adverse health effects, including cancer and reproductive problems. The microwave irradiation was verified in the early 1960s. Studies were conducted of the workers' health in the 1960s and 1970s but the workers were not notified of the exposure or test results until 1976. Ethical values were compromised in this incident by nondisclosure to workers, secrecy and deception. However, this withholding of information from workers and investigators occurred under Cold War conditions and, perhaps, was justified for Cold War objectives. [BENER 13822]
Originally posted by k-string
You're going to get a lot of people coming on here saying that it was stupid to answer those questions at all, much less truthfully.
Originally posted by Ian McLean
reply to post by tmk81
While your thread is interesting and quite coherent (if not assumably believable), I've seen no compelling evidence that the 'military' is in control of such things. Yes, we've all heard of MKULTRA. Sorry, I don't mean to derail; excuse my skepticism.
And to not derail, the OP has mentioned no indication of harassment, other than the perceived surveillance and non-imperative questioning. I, for one, hope his experience ends at that extent; and I see no indication that it won't, other than willful 'come join in our misery' speculation from other members.
Originally posted by Harassment101
I am sorry, can you clarify what you meant by "such things". Do you mean microwave and ultrasonic weapons as described in the Freedom of information file that Donald Friedman received from them? Do you mean those weapons? Or did you mean something else?