Why don't Muslims condemn violence commited by Muslims?, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 11-4-2004 @ 11:18 AM by Leveller
Heh!!!
Pretty topical subject if you live in the UK.

Apparently the Catholic and Protestant churches in the UK do not think that Muslims in this country condone terrorism enough.
I have to tend to agree with them. We have a large Islamic population over here. Their mouthpieces are pretty vocal when they see anything that they deem to be offensive towards Islam but they go very quiet when they should be defending.

news.bbc.co.uk...

"The head of the Catholic Church in England and Wales has echoed criticism of Muslim leaders for not doing enough to denounce acts of terrorism."

The Muslims over here are going wild at this remark and it does tend to back up the archbishops claim. They are certainly making more noise over this accusation than they have over any terrorist attack committed in the name of Islam.

They got pretty pissed about this last month too -

"Lord Carey caused outrage with his lecture in Rome last month when he said regimes in Islamic countries were often authoritarian and committed to power and privilege."

This comment was absolutely justified in my mind. It's about the only sense the Christian church has ever spoken regarding Islam and I'm amazed at the reaction that the remark got. How can Islamic apologists disregard such utter fact?



reply posted on 12-4-2004 @ 01:10 AM by Muaddib
"One of the reasons" why I stopped believing in Catholicism/Christianity is that they have in their own sacred texts many contradictions, like almost all religions have. If there were in this time Christians using any texts of the bible as an excuse to actually kill innocent people like in 9/11, I am sure that the government of the US would be taking care of these crazy idiots.

The problem right now with terrorism in the US is not because of Christian extremists making attacks in the US and all over the world, is it? If Muslims don't want the US in their countries, then why haven't they gone forth and taken care of the extremists themselves?

Simply put, America was attacked, if noone in the Muslim nations tries to root out these extremists then we will. Are we to go away from that part of the world and let these groups of people become stronger and attack us again?

As I have referenced before, Bin Laden has said that he was thinking on backstabbing the US before they rid their lands of the Russian presence, and he said this in an interview in 1995. He and extremist groups have made their minds a long time ago to attack the US and other countries.

Things would be a lot easier if there were no religions in the world imo. You don't need religion to believe in the spiritual world. But people have a right to make their minds and believe in whatever they want. But people also have a right, in this case the US, to take care of extremists, and not letting their people get killed.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Internet as a case study of Socialism
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
Why the need for Constant Growth?
  Posted 5 days ago with 7 member flags
Real Socialists. The Friends Of The Conservatives.
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
The Greenbay Packer\'s Prove That Socialism Works.
  Posted 19 days ago with 5 member flags
On What Date Did Human Freedom End?
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags