I've heard many say that abortion is killing a baby, and therefore, a soul. The baby is a person from conception and must have a soul, so it is murder, etcetera, etcetera. However, I had one question I'd like to pose to you:

What about babies that would not have been born if abortion was not legal? What of women who have abortion, go on to finish college and meet the right guy, and then have children. I think we can all agree that if the woman had the kid, a sort of "Butterfly Effect" would have happened, and her life would have been completely different. I know women who have had abortions and they would not be where they are today if they hadn't.

Many say having an abortion is robbing a child of his/her life, but what about the kids who wouldn't exist if abortion wasn't legal? Isn't that robbing them of their lives?

Some will still argue that adoption would have been the proper choice instead of the abortion.

I sort of follow that idea and would rather see more choices made to that option than the other. Even under circumstances of rape or unplanned pregnancies. It resolves the issue of taking any life at all. It offers life.


Cheers!!!!

I've heard many say that abortion is killing a baby, and therefore, a soul.

If you accept the concept of soul, them killing babies is completely ok as long as no soul is occupying them, right?

That's not a trick question. Just think carefully how you choose to answer it.

If we believe that physical bodies are simply vessels that consciousness occupies on a limited basis, and that it is "soul" that really "is who we are," then destroying the physical body isn't such a big deal, right? The question becomes at what point does "soul" enter into the phsyical body? Or is consciousness a result of the phsyical form? I personally lean towards the idea that spirit preceeds form, rather thabn being created by it, but I suspect that neither you nor I are really in a position to know for sure how these things actually work. However...if we assume that there is a pool of "souls" out there somewhere looking for physical bodies to inhabit, I have to ask...what exactly is the point of sitting around in a fetus for nine months waiting to be born? Why would a soul coming here to experience life on earth choose to enter into a human fetus at conception? And, as a practical matter, if you're a conscious soul, wouldn't you take the time to examine the body you're going to inhabit? And if you do inhabit a fetus at conception it it gets aborted before birth...how terrible is that? You just go and find a new one. Shouldn't be that big of a deal.

But yes...we're discussing the implications of things that we don't really understand the workings of.

I would propose that whatever you decide to believe, at least make sure that it's consistent.

what about the kids who wouldn't exist if abortion wasn't legal?
Isn't that robbing them of their lives?

I've read this over a bunch of times, and I still don't understand what you're trying to say. The legality of abortion is irrelevant. I assume you mean if abortions were not performed. Ok. So...so you're asking if an abortion was not performed, then what about the child who wouldn't exist as a result? That doesn't work. If an abortion is not performed, then a child does come to exist as a result. How is not performing an abortion robbing anyone of their lives?

What are you trying to ask?

Abortion....ahhh, an age old debate.

I personally believe in learning the hard way - and having a baby when having a baby is not a good thing to do is a pretty damn hard lesson, but a lesson nonetheless.

Even going through with the abortion is a lesson of sorts, but a lesson that will leave you wondering "what if" for the rest of your life in most cases.

The fact is - your future is being reshaped all the time, and cannot be predicted or extrapolated with any sort of accuracy at all. No one knows what will happen and no one ever will.

So choosing to keep or abort a baby, it may seem obvious what the possible outcomes may be after such a choice, but the truth is that they are not at all.

I, personally, do not believe in abortion as a course of action in dealing with an unexpected pregnancy. However, that is my decision and my decision alone - and I have no right to push that decision on others, including perhaps, a potential partner who is carrying that child.

Disclaimer aside, I'm not sure if what you're describing could accurately be considered a paradox. However I will say that noone can determine the future aside from following trends and extrapolating likely results. Psychics, prophecy, fortunetellers... none of these have proven a shred of credibility aside from hindsight interpretation after the supposed event. I posit this, though. What if the mother of a fetus decides to not have an abortion. The child grows, and in their teenage years dies due to an accident or suicide. An entire line of progeny is now extinguished. However, had the mother decided to abort the fetus and donate the remains to Stem Cell research, and a cure for some childhood disease were found from this donation. This cure, later, is used to assist a future child of the mother who aborted her original child. The new child now grows healthy in a well established home because her parent could attend collage rather than raising a kid. This new child goes on to bare many offspring and flourish.

However, there's far too many unknown, or inherently unknowable, variables which could drastically modify the outcome to consider when thinking this far ahead. It's not useful for anything aside from baseless speculation. Therefore, I don't feel it's any sort of a platform to argue or discuss from.

I understood! It's an interesting point.

My sister had an abortion and years later had a son. If she had continued with her first pregnancy and had a child, my sweet nephew may have never been born. She only wanted one child.

It's an interesting thing to think about.

Regarding the paradox, there's an assumption that if abortion is made illegal, all young girls/women who would do it legally would also do it illegally. This isn't the case.

Abortion appears to be a selfish act, sacrificing another's life for the sake of one's own prosperity. I've heard the 'mercy kill' argument before, but better to have a hard life with a chance at change or hope than being involuntarily removed from having life at all. As an ex-baby myself, I'm grateful that abortion was never in the mind of my mother. Perhaps we should interview someone who was aborted to get their thoughts.

[edit on 15-1-2009 by saint4God]

There are some multiple universe theories out there that suggest that somewhere in the infinite depths of space and time, everything eventually happens. Every possible outcome eventually happens. Every coin flip. Every change of subatomic state within every atom. So in some of the universes, there's an abortion, and the consequences domino off from that, and in other universes there isn't and abortion, and space and time take a different path. So it's not really even a matter of either/or. All of this stuff happens, will happen, or has already happened.

I personally don't think the Universe works that way, because I'm only aware of one existence, one Universe, happening at a time. I only seem to have one point of view.

Anyway, for a religious person, I suppose it all depends on how much credit they are willing to give their God. How much power they are willing to recognize it as having. Is God only limited to one universe? Or does the entity have everything covered? If you really want God to be omniscient and omnipresent and infinite, then it might be necessary to accept that one woman's decision either to have or not to have a baby is moot. Because it's played out in all permutations in countless other universes, anyway.

But some people believe they know their entity's will.