Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by cluckerspud
The first looks to be CGI.
As for No. 2:
Possibly, yet it is inconclusive.
Proper scrutiny, dissection and video analysis is in
order before it can be determined. Also the witness
needs to be interviewed as well.
Opinion is certainly not going to debunk it.
As it lays on the table, I call it an open case
worthy of further analysis. I'm sure no one will
come forward with the original for analysis though.
Always seems to be the case. In a short time it will
be forgotten.