Germans Divided on Feelings Towards Israel, Poll Shows , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 14-1-2009 @ 07:27 PM by masonwatcher

Germans Divided on Feelings Towards Israel, Poll Shows


www.dw-world.de
Germany is split over its feelings towards Israel, according to a new survey. Of those questioned, 60 per cent thought the country no longer had a special duty towards the Jewish state.

The figures, released on the Web site of German weekly Stern, showed less engagement amongst young people, of whom 70 percent felt no special responsibility towards Israel.

Of those questioned by polling agency Forsa, 35 per cent said this duty did still exist, more than 60 years after the end of World War II.

'Dangerous development'

Forsa's chief executive, Manfred Guellner, said it was a "dangerous development" if the younger generations felt they no longer needed to deal with the events that occurred during the Nazi regime.

(visit the link for the full news article)

Mod Edit: Breaking News Forum Submission Guidelines – Please Review This Link.



[edit on 16/1/2009 by Mirthful Me]


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 07:42 PM by dooper
reply to post by Vitchilo


I'll tell you what Israel did learn. With one exception, they learned that they can beat any Arab force that aligns itself against them.

Now, if we can just move things along a bit, the Persians can get the same lesson that Arabs should have learned long ago.

Egypt has had enough misadventure. Saudi's never had anything to work with anyway. Their own culture is as close to full-bodies paraplegics as a people can become.

Jordan doesn't want any more.

That leaves Syria, Hamas in Gaza, Hizballah in Lebanon, and of course the war-losers in Iran. Iranians can't fight worth crap, historically.

I'm sure that nothing has changed to alter that unbroken string of crushing defeats over the past two and a half millennia.

So to agree in part, Israel has learned many things.


[edit on 14-1-2009 by dooper]


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 08:10 PM by masonwatcher
reply to post by Vitchilo





Well they had a vast empire, but yeah, they were crushed by the greeks at least twice.


They repelled a Persian invasion. it was nothing like the movie.


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 08:54 PM by jatsc
Originally posted by masonwatcher
reply to
post by Vitchilo




They repelled a Persian invasion. it was nothing like the movie.


How did Persian's repel a Persian invasion ? If Persian's were fighting Persian's wouldn't that be a civil war, revolution or overthrowal not an invasion


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 08:55 PM by dooper
Actually, when you combine the Greeks and the Macedonians against the vast Persian Empire, the Persians time and again got slaughtered.

Not just beaten - slaughtered. And each time, the Persians vastly outnumbered their Western enemies, often, five to one.

Darius I, lost 300 ships and 20,000 men off Cape Athos. Didn't even get into a fight.

Marathon, some 44,000 to 60,000 Persians(depending on source) met 10-16,000 Greeks(depending on source), and 6,400 Persians lost to 192 Greeks, resulting in a 33:1 kill ratio.

Xerxes sent 250,000 of the cream of the Persian Empire against Greece, fought a small force of 7,000 Greeks at the Thermopylae, and lost 25,000 Persians, while the Greeks lost 1,000, resulting in a 25:1 kill ratio.

At Salamis, Xerxes watched a small Greek navy sink 200 ships and 40,000 of his men drown. Historians agree that this was a slaughter, likely a 40:1 kill ratio.

At Platea, 300,000 Persians met 60,000 Greeks, and all but 43,000 Persians were killed at the cost of 1,360 Greeks.

Nearby, the remaining 43,000 Persians were killed at the Strymon River estuary, resulting in a total of 220:1 kill ratio.

Granicus, Macedonians met the Greeks, and 4-5,000 Persians were killed for 150 Macedonians, roughly a 26:1 kill ratio.

Issus, taking place just before dark, 94,000 Persians met 42,000 Macedonians, and there was only a 4:1 kill ratio, as the Persians ran faster in the dark than the Macedonians could run down.

Sidon, was crushed.

Guagamela, 250,000 Persians met 47,000 Macedonians, and though outnumbered five to one, the Macedonians slaughtered the Persians on their own, prepared battlefield, resulting ini 50,000 Persian deaths and 500 Macedonian deaths, or, a 100:1 kill ratio.

Then, at Perseopolis, Athenian harlots, led by Thais, burned the Persian capitol.

Thus, lays the foundation for my belief that the Persians, or modern day Iranians, can't fight for squat.

Even against the pisspoor Iraqi army, they could only choose to get slaughtered.

Iran may wish to quieten down and pray that no one in the West pays them any attention. And they certainly don't want any of Israel, a nation of Western immigrants, who've already proven unbeaten even against vastly larger foes.



reply posted on 24-1-2009 @ 03:46 PM by Daystar
Originally posted by Dracula23
reply to
post by masonwatcher



Grow up man your one sided approach makes you look childish and Immature.


Pot

Kettle

Black


Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags