reply to post by jackflap
You might try the first link again - it's still working for me and I can't figure out any reason why it shouldn't work for you too.
OK, e-prime does without the "is of identity" - so instead of saying, "Blackjack
is just entertainment", you'd say "Blackjack just looks
like entertainment to me". Or rather than say "Blackjack
is a NWO trigger mechanism for Illuminati programmed agents" you might instead say
"I've noticed some Illuminati trigger words in there which, if Illuminati assassins exist, might have an effect on them". There is a little more
to it than that, but there's enough on the other page to get the idea. I don't want to repeat myself.
On to part 5 of Blackjack... it's all getting a bit ho-hum, frankly.
Has anyone noticed that the NAU lobbed nukes at, amongst others, China, and there's been no response at all?
I'm reconsidering the idea that different people have been involved. It's as if the beginning was done with some attention to detail and as time
has gone on different people have come in who just aren't as good or careful. It does, however, raise the issue of what would happen if somehow
genuine proof that 9/11 was a false flag came out. Where would loyalties lie then?
Particularly in the US, people are strongly emotionally attached to their flag. I can't think of any patriotic songs for Britain, except for "Rule
Britannia" and the national anthem. But the US has
loads, and even songs like "You're A Grand Old Flag". When I was working in the US I
just used to look on all this stuff as evidence of collective mental illness. I mean, there are at least four or five songs
just about the ****ing
flag, FCOL.
So
Blackjack makes it easy, in that sense: people would be attached to the old flag, not to the new. As Einstein put it, "flags are a sad
reminder of the fact that man is still a herd animal". But of course in the real world, those responsible for 9/11 would still be waving the Stars
and Stripes. Makes it difficult to know who to shoot at.