I just received this email and thought I would share it with you all:
USDA is poised to deregulate the world’s first genetically engineered (GE) industrial crop. Similar to GE pharma crops that use corn for
producing drugs, Syngenta’s “Event 3272” is genetically engineered to use corn for energy (ethanol) production and not for food. This
unprecedented, industrial application of a GE technology poses a variety of environmental, health, and economic risks that must be carefully evaluated
to determine whether the widespread use of this GE industrial corn crop should be allowed on farms across our nation.
In a “business as usual” move, USDA has fast-tracked the commercialization of this GE industrial corn and has forgone conducting a full
Environmental Impact Study (EIS), as required by law. Instead, USDA is basing its decision to approve the industrial GE corn upon a cursory and
incomplete Environmental Assessment (EA) that falls woefully short of the thorough review the public expects before a new GE crop is approved.
Moreover, USDA has failed to acknowledge that this GE technology requires even greater scrutiny since it transforms a ubiquitous food crop —corn—
into an industrial crop — ethanol— making it no longer fit for human consumption.
The Obama Administration’s USDA must complete a full EIS to address these concerns. The agency is accepting public comments only until January 20,
2009.
Event 3272 corn:
- Raises serious environmental and human health concerns. It contains an exotic enzyme derived from “thermophilic” (heat-loving)
microorganisms living near deep sea hydrothermal vents. This enzyme might be capable of causing food allergies in people who inadvertently consume
this corn. Humans have never been exposed to this form of alpha amylase before (no history of safe use).
- While meant for fuel and not food, this corn will enter the food supply. USDA admits that if Event 3272 corn is intentionally or accidentally
diverted into the food supply, it could negatively impact food quality. But instead of reviewing the foreseeable negative impacts of biological
contamination to organic and conventional corn from this unprecedented new industrial crop, USDA has improperly relied on Syngenta, the creator of the
GE corn, to protect non-industrial corn from contamination. If we learned anything from the StarLink episode, it is that voluntary, industry-led
agreements to curtail contamination do not work in the real world.
- Is not needed “to help the U.S. meet its goals for ethanol production” as USDA has erroneously suggested. Ethanol production from corn
surpassed the 2012 target (7.5 billion gallons) in 2007 (8.2 billion gallons)! And with 10 billion gallons of ethanol produced in 2008, we’re well
on the way to achieving the mandate for 2022 without the introduction of Event 3272 corn.
- Is engineered for fuel, not food. The dramatic worldwide surge in food prices last year – which has already pushed 100 million more of the
world’s poor into hunger and poverty – has caused a radical rethinking of how biofuels are produced, especially the use of corn for ethanol. Food
experts from academia to the World Bank have decried the massive diversion of corn from food to fuel, blaming it for at least part of the steep price
increases in food staples like corn, wheat and rice. Event 3272 corn will only exacerbate this situation.
Tell USDA to halt this approval until a full EIS has been completed that addresses the human health, environmental, and economic impacts this
industrial corn presents. USDA is accepting public comments until January 20th—Send your comment today
ga3.org...
I thought we all might want to consider what this means, and perhaps take action...
[edit on 1/14/2009 by Amaterasu]
|
Maybe I posted this in the wrong place...?
Any mod help would be great.
|
I might add that almost all corn grown is not fit for human consumption in the first place. I doubt the corn we use to make ethanol today is
considered by the FDA to be edible. Most corn is meant for animal feed (which happens to be a hideously inefficient system, but we sure do love eating
animals.)
|
As I'm personally against any and all GE crops, I've gone ahead and participated and sent the message at the website. Sounds a lot like Monsanto, I
haven't been keeping as good a tab as I should be but I know that this won't end well.
|
Originally posted by mdiinican
I might add that almost all corn grown is not fit for human consumption in the first place. I doubt the corn we use to make ethanol today is
considered by the FDA to be edible. Most corn is meant for animal feed (which happens to be a hideously inefficient system, but we sure do love eating
animals.)
Add to this the fact that genmod corn's pollen cannot be contained - Mexican farmers are finding genmod in fields where no genmod has been planted,
even nearby.
So... If we contaminate the biosphere with this stuff, we are threatening even the crops we DO want with cross-pollination and therefore severe
contamination of those we might eat.
|
