One in five Guantanamo Bay detainees is on hunger strike, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 14-1-2009 @ 12:49 PM by magicmushroom

One in five Guantanamo Bay detainees is on hunger strike


www.timesonline.co.uk
Nearly a fifth of the detainees held at Guantanamo Bay are on hunger strike with the aim of attracting the attention of Barack Obama, military officials have told the Times, with most of them being force fed.

Of the 248 inmates inside the controversial US detention facility, 44 are refusing food, and 33 of those are receiving nutrition with tubes that are forced up their noses and into their stomachs
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 01:20 PM by blupblup
reply to post by nyk537




This has been answered... but you decided to "leave" the thread after being shown up.

Also, i have posted in the other thread www.abovetopsecret.com...
Rumsfeld is being sued... and hopefully bush too.

legaltimes.typepad.com...

Excellent news





[edit on 14/1/09 by blupblup]


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 01:29 PM by blupblup
reply to post by nyk537



Well thank you.

I wouldn't want you to "appear" like you supported this abomination anyway.
Can't be a good thing huh?

If you see something against T+C's... report it


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 01:45 PM by blupblup
reply to post by nyk537



Also, You dodged every point i raised(on the original thread) and didn't "get into" anything with me

And making allusions that i was against T+C's or was being rude is not fair.

In your own info... more than half who were detained there were released without charge?
The percentage of "possible" terrorists is so small that it's pathetic?

You did support it

Originally posted by nyk537
In my opinion, they should stay right where they are…in GITMO.



That was my problem.
You supporting a facility/prison/whatever that the ENTIRE WORLD is against... i mean seriously...?

Do you honestly think it's ok to lock people up with no trial, no law on your side and without the right to a lawyer or a fair (and FAIR being the operative word) trial?

[edit on 14/1/09 by blupblup]


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 01:59 PM by BlueRaja
Originally posted by magicmushroom


Why are these people still locked up in this illegal prison. This prison should have never even opened in the first place. Locking people up without due process under trumped up charges and hastilly encated laws is guess againsat the law.

Time for the American Government to close the place and say they did it all wrong.

www.timesonline.co.uk
(visit the link for the full news article)



Hmmm,

perhaps this story might explain-

www.reuters.com...

"The Pentagon said on Tuesday that 61 former detainees from its military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, appear to have returned to terrorism since their release from custody."

"Pentagon officials say that about 110 detainees should never be released because of the potential danger they pose to U.S. interests."

"Washington has cleared 50 of the detainees for release but cannot return them to their home countries because of the risk they would be tortured or persecuted there."


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 02:01 PM by blupblup
reply to post by nyk537



Fair enough, although your comments and language lead me to believe otherwise.

The point is that America locked these people up illegally... why should anyone else have to take them?
As i said, I'm happy to do it just so that this joke closes down... but really, you created the problem.. YOU deal with it.
I referenced other stories of detainees being released back to the UK and being released without charge... point being, they did nothing wrong.

I know you are talking about the ridiculously small amount of people that "might" be a threat, but then put them on TRIAL... in a proper COURT and deal with it.



reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 02:11 PM by BlueRaja
Originally posted by blupblup
reply to
post by nyk537



Fair enough, although your comments and language lead me to believe otherwise.

The point is that America locked these people up illegally... why should anyone else have to take them?
As i said, I'm happy to do it just so that this joke closes down... but really, you created the problem.. YOU deal with it.
I referenced other stories of detainees being released back to the UK and being released without charge... point being, they did nothing wrong.

I know you are talking about the ridiculously small amount of people that "might" be a threat, but then put them on TRIAL... in a proper COURT and deal with it.


What you have to understand is that there are different burdens of proof for criminal prosecution, and the detainees in Gitmo, detained for various reasons(captured in the act of hostilities, detained for purposes of intel analysis, etc...)
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags