Originally posted by sputniksteve
So the Principle, and teachers involved should be sued for everything they own, because they were not professionals at restraining children. That must
be the answer.
Definately need to be held responsible for their actions. They're adult and know )or are supposed to know) better.
If you read the article you would see that the child was pinching, spitting, kicking at the adults involved.
She did the right thing. I guess you're gonna tel me she started. had nothing to do with adults putting their hands (physically) on a child? Don't
they teach us we don't have the right to touch anyone? or does this only apply to some people under certain circumstances?
I fail to see how financially ruining these people will help anything.
They will think twice before commtting these actions against a helpless child again.Maybe crriminals shouldn't get arrested and pay for their crimes
too.
How about some training on how to deal with Autistic kids? That sounds like a much better idea to me.
Good idea, but i'm sure they were aware of her condition before this which means they are negligent in not being trained already. if they weren't
prepared to handle a child under these circumstances, it should have been known ahead of time.
And if you read the article you would know that this all happened because the child refused to listen to directions and decided taht she would go to
the party anyway, even though she was told to sit in a room for not following a simple direction.
Exactly. This escalated because of the incompetence of the staff.Because the girl refused to listen to some direction, this makes her a criminal? Lock
her in solitary confinement and disclude her from what everyone else is enjoying?That's a real mature decision. As a matter of fact, if tey let this
little girl go to the party, I guarantee this event would have never occured and her big crime of not following directions may have EASILY been
corrected in the proper manner. people are so quick to judge crimes and imprison people.
Does no one here think that maybe, just maybe part of this blame should be put on the child, that in all fairness did attack the adults, no matter how
big or little the size/weight difference?
I honestly can't believe what you're saying.
At what point does the child have to take responsibility for their actions and what point are they free from responsibility?
Exactly. Didi you see what you wrote? At what point does a
CHILD have to take responsibility? They're
CHILDREN and that's why we take
care of them. They aren't capable or have the experience or knowledge to be responsible yet.
WOW.
Is that objective enough for you?
It sounds like you're the only one who disagrees and is being naively objective to this. Is this because you have committed similar acts or are just
blind and irrational?
[edit on 14/1/2009 by Revealation]
[edit on 14/1/2009 by Revealation]