It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Adolf Hitler, Sisters Taken from Parents' Home

page: 6
13
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 05:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Leto
 


Although it is an assumption that the childs future would be ruined, I think it's valid. Come on, you don't think that a child named ADOLF HITLER would go through pure hell?????

My name is a bit odd and I had a hard time in school with other children, parents and even teachers.




posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 05:57 PM
link   
reply to post by questioningall
 




For the reason alone of having a child's name others may not agree with, is not a valid reason to take the kids away.

People are saying "Oh, there must be something the parents did", well if there is something they did, the authorities should come out fast and say what it is. Otherwise, we are being led to believe the only reason is the child's name.



Again, there is zero evidence the kids were taken away due to their names. Not everyone is being led to believe that and those that are, are making assumptions based on paranoia of the government wanting to snatch kids away - just because.

The authorities don't have to come out and tell us anything - after all, at then end of the day it isn't even our business. It is a matter of that family. And more then likely there is some investigation being done.

It is more logical the kids were taken away due to other factors - not being their names. There is just no logic in why family services would take those kids away SOLEY for their names.

[edit on 1/14/2009 by greeneyedleo]



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 05:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Blaine91555
This has been an interesting thread.

I don't think it is out of line considering the name we are discussing, to assume the parents intent or that they themselves are Nazi's. The evidence is so overwhelming as to make it almost laughable to suggest that their intentions were anything other than what is being assumed.


See it's nice to assume, and it might even be true, but so far the parents have said that they are not, and we have no definative proof, I agree the circumstancial evidence is there, but even if they are, you don't have a right to take kids on the premisis of this, unless the laws have changed, and then many families better go running for the hills, cause they will not stop there.




I still go back to the children and the harm they will suffer. Look at the abuse any child who is even slightly different has to endure. You can be sure that young Adolf will endure ten times as much and more. They may as well have named him Hit-me-kick-me Make-me-eat-dirt.


So you can't be different now, because society is narrow minded? He will only endure this is society is stupid. Obama was able to over coming sharing not one, but two names of unliked people, I mean what are the chances of this. On of his name is really close to Osama bin ladin, and then Saddam Hussain, but people were open minded enough to see past this and vote for him.




You can also assume that the parents are Nazi's based on the evidence available. Even in court I think there would be ample circumstantial evidence.


We can assume it, but we can not prove it. He has also said that they are not. They might be, but we don't have proof that they are, and even if they are, you can't take peoples kids on the basis of this. I just read what one guy from the New Black Panther party said about another group of people, and it wasn't nice, but he should not have his kids taken away for his views or the party he is a part of anymore than these people should, unless there is serious abuse happening. Yes teaching hate can be abusive, but then in the news today we have Prince Chales and sons getting slack for calling a friend of his "sooty", refering to the guys skin color.

Prince Charles says he is not racist. Then prince Harry recently refered to middle Eastern person as a Pak* and Rag Heads. Apparently both terms are racist, and the young prince says he is not a racist. So we would investigate and then pass judgement and the same should be true for these people.




Rights are one thing but equating the right to name your child something that will ruin his future and teaching Nazi values to a right worth protecting, is carrying it into the silly zone. Arguing for that is just arguing for the sake of arguing and any semblance of common sense has left the building.


I don't think the child being name Hitler will ruin his future, heck the fame and celebrity might even help him at this stage. Later on I mean. I am saying that in a democratic society, people have the right to have those views, the same way the guy from the black panther is allowed to have his view, wither you agree with it or not.

Arguing it is not for the sake of arguing it, it's for the sake of democracy and all that we hold dear. If they can do it to these people, they will do it to others and that is why it must be challenged and stopped if those are the reasons for taking these kids.

[edit on 14-1-2009 by Harassment101]



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 05:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by Leto
 


Although it is an assumption that the childs future would be ruined, I think it's valid. Come on, you don't think that a child named ADOLF HITLER would go through pure hell?????

My name is a bit odd and I had a hard time in school with other children, parents and even teachers.



If they cannot find any public schools where such problems are mostly constrained they can try home schooling.

[edit on 14-1-2009 by Leto]



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 06:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by Leto
 


Although it is an assumption that the childs future would be ruined, I think it's valid. Come on, you don't think that a child named ADOLF HITLER would go through pure hell?????

My name is a bit odd and I had a hard time in school with other children, parents and even teachers.



The kid could use his initials A.H. Campbell and then go onto wall street and then that would be pure evil. (Just Joking.) The only way his life will be hell is if our ignorant society makes it so. As long as this kid grows up to be a good person, then it should not matter what his name is. It's the character of the person that counts. Naming your kid Jesus does not make them the messiah, and naming your kid Hitler does not make him evil.

What will count is how the character turns out, as a society we can help fascilitate that for the better by not harassing the kid because of his name, by not creating a monster. We have some responsibility in this as well.

Back to the issue at hand. Don't take kids from their parents because they choose to give them names we disapproved of, or because of the organization, or even religion they belong to.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by greeneyedleo

Again, there is zero evidence the kids were taken away due to their names. Not everyone is being led to believe that and those that are, are making assumptions based on paranoia of the government wanting to snatch kids away - just because.

The authorities don't have to come out and tell us anything - after all, at then end of the day it isn't even our business. It is a matter of that family. And more then likely there is some investigation being done.

It is more logical the kids were taken away due to other factors - not being their names. There is just no logic in why family services would take those kids away SOLEY for their names.

[edit on 1/14/2009 by greeneyedleo]


Great I would hope that the state would not take the kids away based on their names, but the parents are saying, they have not been given a reason. That is disturbing and troubling. Then the police are saying that they don't know, that is also disturbing and troubling, someone somewhere must know something, but at this moment in time, all I know is those kids are aware from their parents, they are probably scared, cause they are all really young, and the parents are probably doing what they can to get the kids back, but to be honest they didn't look that well to do, so I don't know what kid of legal defence they can mount at this stage.

The bottom line for me is, before the state takes kids away from parents, they better have a damn good reason, and second that reason needs to be given to the parents.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 06:20 PM
link   


Police sergeant was assured they were not taken away because of name, birthday cake incident


All I can is what a load of BS that statement is. It's clearly obvious these children were taken away from the parents because they felt that the parents may just be in fact "unstable" if they consider naming their child a former leader of Germany during World War II.

Also, the parents HAD to know naming their kid ADOLF HITLER would get some heat from others......but that doesn't mean they should be treated unfairly.

Both sides are complete morons IMO



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 06:24 PM
link   
I so hope this was politically motivated and wish I were these parents. I would sue the state for every penny I could get. Just because you arrange some letters and call your child that means nothing.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 06:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck

Originally posted by The All Seeing I...if the name you chose for your child could be taken as a form of child abuse ... then we have quite a few celebrities to lock up.

Gwyneth Paltrow comes to mind... she named her kids Moses and Apple
or Frank Zappa's kids Moon Unit, Dweezil, Ahmet Emuukha Rodan and Diva Thin Muffin Pigeene.


I beg to disagree. It's one thing for a parent to offer up a ridiculous name...Zappa's kids are a fine example. But they are blessed with living with unorthodox parents, and can always assume a nickname. I'm sure Zowie Bowie had occasion to say "Yes, well, my Da's the Thin White Duke." and others would respond "Well, of course, then."

Naming a kid Adolph Hitler is child abuse because it not only fixes a kid up with one of the most despised names in history, but it also adds the foot note: "Oh, by the way, my parents are total White Trash in every sense of the concept." Which makes it even more abusive. Children should not be subject to derision, and if their parents do so...in this singular mannner... they are harming the children and are shouting out that they are not fit to parent them.
Are you living in a fantasy land man? YES YOU ARE. Guess what, no matter what you name your kid they will get picked on, hit, made fun of, called names, physically and mentally beaten and worse in life. The kid could obviously say his name is something else like Al very early in life. Get a clue, nobody needs anyone else telling them what to name their kid. What people DO need is for other people to not be so dumb ass that they start controversy over someones #ing name. If others dont like it tough #. We wouldnt need freedom of speech to protect kind loving speech. Freedom of speech is for a case JUST LIKE THIS! Jeezus Krist.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 06:54 PM
link   
I have to wonder about those of you who think that this child will suffer abuse from his playmates on account of his name.......would you have harrassed a kid with an odd name?
He will in all likelybood simply be known as Adolf Campbell.

And thosse of you who think that they are "Nazis".....
What exactly does "Nazi" mean to you?
Now compare your notions to what the American Nazi Party has to say about themselves.
Nazi



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:12 PM
link   
Last I checked, being a Nazi is not "illegal" nor does it constitute child abuse.

Nor is it illegal to be a member of the Nation of Islam. I don't hear about any of their children being taken away because of a name.

A child can grow up with the name Adolph and be ok. Are the parents a-holes for it? Yes of course. They aren't thinking of the children, they are thinking of their own stupid agenda. But at the end of the day, what right does the government have to take their children away?? They sure don't do a good enough job protecting the real dangers to children. How many stories do you hear of foster children being abused, beaten, murdered? But hell... lets take away a couple of kids because their parents might have different views of the world. Come on...



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:14 PM
link   
reply to post by questioningall[moreI could not agree more.  perhaps we should simply give our children numerical names in an attempt to not be offensive.  How about Joseph (stalin), Fidel, Pol, Che, any number of names associated with offensive people of history.   I have no doubt that these folks are low-lifes and that they are indeed setting their kids up for a hard road, but the state has absolutely no right to take the kids away absent abuse - and giving them a name is not abuse.   What happens when a relatively common name is also the name of someone who is an absolute horrific person?  do we force folks to have their names changed?  this is way, way too much For some reason this reminds me of an old Johnny Cash song.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by Erasurehead
There is more to this story that has not come out yet. There must have been some mental or physical abuse going on for the state of NJ to remove the children.


Naming your child Adolf Hitler and not raising him/her in a "Space of Love" is a form of [mental] abuse.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:20 PM
link   
Lets make this very clear. Every child has been named after a NAZI. The house is filled with NAZI crap. The Parents are covered in NAZI tattoos. They are NAZIs. Next it is child abuse to brainwash your children in to being hate filled monsters. It takes away any chance of a future for these children. Both because of the name and of the "education" provided too them by NAZIs. In a job interview, realize the person interviewing them is Jewish, and leaping across the desk too kill them.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by GamerGal
Lets make this very clear. Every child has been named after a NAZI. The house is filled with NAZI crap. The Parents are covered in NAZI tattoos. They are NAZIs. Next it is child abuse to brainwash your children in to being hate filled monsters. It takes away any chance of a future for these children. Both because of the name and of the "education" provided too them by NAZIs. In a job interview, realize the person interviewing them is Jewish, and leaping across the desk too kill them.


They claim they're not NAZIs, but even if they are NAZIs it is not against any law in the U.S. Even if they are NAZIs it does not necessarily mean they are teaching their children to kill people. Communists, NAZIs, socialists, they and many others are allowed to be citizens of the U.S as long as they don't break any laws.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:34 PM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:52 PM
link   
So even on ats there is no political tolerance?
These people should not be free to decide for themselves what political affiliation to choose?

I don't care if they are purple fascist fruitarians from the moon if they are U.S. citizens they have the RIGHT to believe as they please!
They have the RIGHT to name the children what ever they please!

If it turns out that the children were taken for no cause; I will petition the aclu to sue the pants off of the state.

This is AMERICA people!We have RIGHTS!

Just because you are different than everyone else does not mean you get less rights!



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 08:16 PM
link   
I think by calling your child Adolf Hitler, you are putting out a statement

what that statement is, is down to personal feelings on the matter



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 09:08 PM
link   
reply to post by wiredamerican
 


Right on! Think about it, after the big big fuss they caused over the birthday cake incident (and by the way, why not make your own bloomin' cake?! it's cheaper especially when you're both on welfare) the amount of attention they would have drawn to themselves from investigators from numerous agencies, some more willing to pin them for something because of their absolute offence taken with such names.

Secondly, I'd like to point out that both these parents, both young, have 3 children and are both on unemployment with alleged disabilities. Perhaps they weren't being honest to the social securities office? Who knows?

What should be known is that nobody is saying why these children were removed. There is more to it than just the names.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 09:13 PM
link   
make no mistake about it,new jersey is a fascist state. i have dealt with dyfs before and they need no reason to take your children away.
no court order,no proof,nothing.i just recently escaped from new jersey ,myself. i had to raise my daughter there and the school she went to got us involved with these idiots.
they have no special training or extra education for the "social work" they do.
i had smacked my daughter on the bottom for something that deserved it,and at a conference at school,i told them so. thats when they stepped in. it wasn't anything that could have hurt her,and they knew it.
the CAMDEN branch came to my house and "inspected my child"while i was told to go into another room.
the case file was open until she was 18.
the only way i got them off my back was to call them to ask them how i was supposed to discipline my child when she was bad.
their answer was always the same...i don't know.
got to be they wouldn't answer my calls anymore.
but they got to ride around in state cars,with state cell phones doing what they wanted to do.
i also knew a couple that was getting seperated.the wife thought she was slick and reported her husband for abuse. dyfs came right out ans with no proof,took the children away,and put them into the system.no proof,no court order,just took them.thats what they used to do in germany ...it's called fascism plain and simple. so please dont tell me that new jersey had a reason.until you have proof.
i lived there a long time and i never saw them do ANYTHING constructive in the community.

DYFS IN NJ=DIVISIN OF YOUTH AND FASCIST SERVICES

also,clinton's gun ban was almost word for word translated from the nazi gun control laws. i guess they should have taken chelsea away for that too.
doesn't that make him a pro-nazi parent?



[edit on 14-1-2009 by Spectre0o0]




top topics



 
13
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join