In the land of the free eh??
This is just an example of how free Americans are.
Freedom of speech???
Land of the free???
As nuts as it may be to name a kid adolph hitler,its even more nuts telling people what they should do and what to name their kids.

[edit on 14-1-2009 by DrumsRfun]

Just shows you the maturity level of society as a whole.

As you had pointed out if the name you chose for your child could be taken as a form of child abuse ... then we have quite a few celebrities to lock up.

Gwyneth Paltrow comes to mind... she named her kids Moses and Apple
or Frank Zappa's kids Moon Unit, Dweezil, Ahmet Emuukha Rodan and Diva Thin Muffin Pigeene.

Now you could say that is miles a part from naming a kid after a notorious world famous figure, but again where do we draw the line? Allow the state to dictate to us what appropriate names are? And as far as the bithday cake goes, if you are a paying customer you should be able to have written whatever you wanted on it, it is your cake and it is america after all or did we loose our fundamental right to freedom speech?

Besides even those who have been branded by history as monsters... not any different then the very worst of us nobodies, we all have some good qualities, but that is beside the point. Unfortunately for some kids, they are given names that give society a free-pass to haunt them with, but usually in such cases when the kid is old enough they will initiate a name change or it will just occur naturally socially, going by a nick name or variation of their birth name.

ie Addy the Hitman... sounds like a jewish mobster...
and depending on your research Hitler closely fit that bill

Originally posted by The All Seeing I...if the name you chose for your child could be taken as a form of child abuse ... then we have quite a few celebrities to lock up.

Gwyneth Paltrow comes to mind... she named her kids Moses and Apple
or Frank Zappa's kids Moon Unit, Dweezil, Ahmet Emuukha Rodan and Diva Thin Muffin Pigeene.

I beg to disagree. It's one thing for a parent to offer up a ridiculous name...Zappa's kids are a fine example. But they are blessed with living with unorthodox parents, and can always assume a nickname. I'm sure Zowie Bowie had occasion to say "Yes, well, my Da's the Thin White Duke." and others would respond "Well, of course, then."

Naming a kid Adolph Hitler is child abuse because it not only fixes a kid up with one of the most despised names in history, but it also adds the foot note: "Oh, by the way, my parents are total White Trash in every sense of the concept." Which makes it even more abusive. Children should not be subject to derision, and if their parents do so...in this singular mannner... they are harming the children and are shouting out that they are not fit to parent them.

I'd like to know the reason behind the removal of the children. I bet it will come down to the family being White Supremists and teaching their children anti-semantic beliefs.

Giving you kid a weird name is the "cool" thing to do these days. Not even just for celebrities. And with the mixing of cultures pretty much all over we see a lot of "ethnic" names that we might see as odd but are perfectly normal for that culture, I once knew a guy named "Phuc" but pronounced Foo.

I do agree that that naming you kid Adolph Hitler and the other one Aryan Nation is abuse and I don't understand why the department that processes birth certificates allowed it.

makes me think of a low friction incline.

they start by banning the name adolf hitler and teaching your kids that white people are the best, it all seems fine. They ban people from teaching kids about activism and terrorism , it all goes unnoticed. They ban people from teaching kids about freedom -it's too late.

[edit on 14-1-2009 by NatureBoy]

Lots of Chinese guys named Mau. He killed more then hitler.

Lots of people named Lenin.....he made Hitler look like a schoolboy.

Why not let the truth be known about Hitler?

I had a girlfriend from Berlin Germany and she told me that in Germany, you had to give your children names that were approved by the Government. Apparently they have a book of names that can be used.

What would they do if they named their kid This Oppressive Government?
Now that would make a good courtcase!!

[edit on 14-1-2009 by DrumsRfun]

I am guessing that they see naming a child with that name "IS" child abuse.

Kinda makes you wonder what parents would name their child with that name.

Perhaps they feel if they are willing to do that, what else are they willing to do.

Gil,

You make a very good point.

They did openly complain to the news about the birthday cake issue.

Why are they not screaming out loud if their children were removed based only on the child's name.

I also think their is far more going on than we have been told,

[edit on 1/14/2009 by mrmonsoon]

I agree with Greeneyedleo.

There is more to this that will come out. For the parents to use the children to make their political statement, of sorts, is wrong. These children will live with their parents stupidity for their entire lives, even if they change their names.

They look like a fine example of genetics in general. A worthy example of their cause.

Poor kids. Their parents are self-serving dip#s, and because of it their lives are turned upside down.

Originally posted by NatureBoy
they start by banning the name adolf hitler and teaching your kids that white people are the best, it all seems fine. They ban people from teaching kids about activism and terrorism , it all goes unnoticed. They ban people from teaching kids about freedom -it's too late.

The obvious point has been made by Jackinthebox...why were they allowed to register those names in the first place?

However, I have seen some examples of child abuse hit the media of late, where the state was aware of something hinky going on, but was reluctant to make a move. The results were varying degrees of tragedy which in retrospect, had been telegraphed. That being said, where there are indications of parental neglect for the welfare of the child, the state should act first and ask questions later.

Personally, in a case where children are given names that obviously indicate parents with a high degree of stupidity over and above those normally associated with white supremacists...these are people that could see themselves going down in flames 'for the sake of the race'...they should be made to account for themselves.

They've fired the first salvo in naming the kids as they did. That is obviously not for the edification of the kids, nor is it of an endearing nature. It's rubbing somebody's nose in apparent 1'st Amendment Rights, and now being trumped by the childrens' rights.

From the info presented here, it's a good call. Let's see how it plays out.