[edit on 22-1-2009 by bricoluvsu]

They answered:

Dear Ms. Xxxxxx

thank you for your request.

Unfortunately we cannot help you. There were no analysis performed in BAM.

Kind regards,

Great work Batman It was always likely to be a hoax and you seem to have nailed it even more. Well done for being proactive in finding out for yourself and letting us all know

The plates were left by the circle makers so psychometrically gifted persons could 'communicate' with them. Three different metals would have provided independent corroboration of the impressions received. The coding refers to four comets that will strike the earth in the future. The four circles connected by four lines indicate a common purpose for the comets. Next, the trajectory around the sun is shown for three comets. The fourth, with a coma to indicate it comes first, doesn't go around the sun. Last, the angles of the four comets relative to each other are given. Again, the comets with comas strike first. The circle makers are so detailed because they are the ones directing the comets to their impact areas. All crop circles are concerned with comets striking the earth (besides other possible meanings). A new book coming out this spring called "The Heck Hypothesis" interprets over 1000 crop circles in this way.

Has anyone ever found silver or gold? When you do it's cut into veins inside the rock and is always impure. Pure gold is expensive.

Lets put that into american currency shall we.

You find a gold coin and still have two more. Someone offers you $30,000.00 for it. For most people that is a lot of money. Money they could use to feed their family or maybe buy themselves a new toy. It was later melted and sold for $100,000.00.. If I was hoaxing this i would have sold it for more than its face value (since if it was a hoax he would already know the face value). I think this one is viable. I don't think all crop circles are hoaxes even though a lot of them are.

Originally posted by Gawdzilla
reply to post by thegagefather


"I want it debunked, yes. And I do believe the artifacts found were most likely of alien origin. I did not, however, ask for an argument. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Also, you didn't really debunk anything. Let MischievousElf insinuated, let us keep this civilized."

I never said you weren't entitled to your opinion. I'm just wondering why you think that. You don't have to reply, of course.

And thing would be more civilized if people were a little less defensive. Simply asking questions isn't being combative.


Well, keeping the answer to your question short..

The silver was 99.9% Silver, more pure than sterling silver. The radiation level was 178% that of normal. None of the plant life was broken, just bent, and it wrapped around in a specific pattern, there was an unusual amount of heat in said area... etc.

I felt there was a LOT of evidence pointing to something extraterrastrial.

In addition to that... I felt this was also evidence, coming from the opposite side of the spectrum:


Originally posted by thegagefather
In addition, I strongly doubt the motivation to create crop circles, and create fairly undisputable evidence of extraterrestrials would generate the initiative in a highly intelligent human being to take his time out to learn how to create a hoax, not to mention the money that would have to be put into it, and the careful planning it would take to not be caught in the process while taking the time to perfect the crop circles without breaking a single stalk, and creating a distinct pattern in the plant life.

Again, I can't prove this, and of course it is POSSIBLE, but I feel my argument is stronger than your rebuttal, considering the likeliness of the situation you presented.


[edit on 21-4-2009 by thegagefather]

Food for thought!


[edit on 21-4-2009 by thegagefather]