reply to post by Titen-Sxull
A global flood is very possible. As for the water, the Bible says God "broke up the waters of the deep" in addition to rain. One plausible
scenario is that the earth originally had one continent, some cataclysmic event occurred (like a meteor strike - remember that crater off the
Yucatan?), and that caused massive earthquakes, volcanoes, and plate shifts. The continent sank and was inundated with water. (There's your
Atlantis legend). It took a few months for everything to settle down, and then there were new continents, deep ocean basins, and new mountains. And
the earth was covered in layers of mud filled with dead things, even on tops of mountains and in the Arctic. Now, you don't have to believe that
exact scenario. But it IS possible.
Feasibility studies have also shown that the ark certainly could have held the required species. It would have had the interior volume of over 500
cattle cars, each of which could hold 240 sheep-sized animals. If you consider that all of the aquatic species and most of the insect species could
have survived the flood, and that not all types of animals, like various dogs, would have to be represented, then it is very feasible.
Yes, things have been omitted from "canon" over the centuries. But the church leaders had to have some way to determine whether or not to include a
writing. Otherwise, they would have compromised their beliefs. They wanted to stay as close to the Apostolic teachings as possible, because there
were a lot of counterfeit Christianities floating around, like Gnosticism and Arianism. So they made a few rules and stuck by them:
1) Was the author an Apostle or someone closely affiliated with such?
2) Did most churches accept the writing as scripture?
3) Did the writing hold to accepted teachings?
4) Was the writing spiritually and morally sound?
Some books are still contested, that's why you have a different canon for Catholics and Protestants. But if you believe the Bible is God's Word,
then you believe He has supernaturally assembled and preserved it; if you don't believe that, then it doesn't matter.
There are a few extra-Biblical references to Jesus of Nazareth, his teachings, or his crucifixion: Josephus, Jewish historian; Tacitus, Roman
historian; Thallus, Roman historian; Pliny the Younger, Roman governor; The Talmud, Jewish commentary; and Lucian, Greek writer. All these
manuscripts were written within a century of Jesus' death, well within the accepted time allowed for other historical books such as Herodotus'
"History" and Thucydides' "History". As for archeological evidence, there is none, but that is not surprising since Jesus was a poor vagabond
executed as a criminal. Jewish artifacts are scarce from that era anyway.
Very Sincerely Yours




