Originally posted by Oreyeon
Sigh....
This is why the paranormal field gets such a bad rap. I hate to burst your bubble friend...Orbs are not ghosts, and Smoke is definitely not evidence
of paranormal activity.
Seriously...
I am a paranormal investigator. I've seen and heard things that are crazy, and still unexplained, so I'm no diehard skeptic. On that same token,
I'm not a diehard fanatical believer either. We review each and every incident we investigate with scrutiny. And I can assure you with 99% confidence
that orbs and smoke do not constitute spirits. Period. For the Orbs, try taking pictures in a dust-free location or clean your lens. Orbs are dust
and/or bugs reflecting the light from the flash.
As for the "ectoplasm", don't smoke while you're taking pictures. Simple as that.
The moral of the story is this...quit posting bull, because people like yourself give the field of study into the paranormal a bad name.
Hey Oreyeon, I've been a paranormal investigator for over 20 years and I have a few questions for you. First, I agree with you that it is smoke,
however since when do orbs and smoke NOT constitute spirits? I'm with you when you say 99 percent of orbs are dust, bugs, and whatnot... but I've
seen more that could be something. I'm talking about the orbs that aren't the normal circle orb that is probably dust or whatnot... I'm talking
about videos of orbs moving around and even EM detectors going off while the orb is visible.
The same goes for smoke also... I've seen some strange things there. I mean, obviously they aren't all just smoke... I'm not attacking here, just
curious why you would give up on orbs especially? It does get a bit frustrating with so many people showing orb photos and making so much out of the
crap that most are... but still there are those few that make me wonder.
So much of the paranormal is speculation anyway. Your just the first person I've met who seems to have written them off 100 percent(even though I
know you said 99 percent). Usually most investigators will give at least a possibility for their existence.
One last thing brother. He has every right to present his evidence for us to talk about. He isn't making the paranormal look bad, just misunderstood.
I felt you unjustly attacked him a bit there. I do see how he is over- reacting to anyone who doesn't believe his findings... but still. I just wish
we could all be a bit more respectful on this forum... on BOTH sides (in other words, I'm not just talking to you). I don't think it is cool that he
gets so upset when people disagree with his beliefs... not everyone is going to believe for goodness sakes...and if I was taking things that personal
I would never post something like that on here anyway. Sorry if I came off like a jerk... not trying to be.