It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by adam_zapple
I don't think you understand what that means....but let's find out.
Based on the image above, when the concrete sphere is dropped:
C'mon you're kidding me right?
Originally posted by ANOK
The 'sphere' in your diagram is going to drop straight down, path of least resistance, until it meets resistance, the block. What else do you want me to say about it?
Originally posted by ANOKNo, the lower building is not going to apply any more force to the top than it was already applying. Where are you expecting this 'extra force' to come from?
Originally posted by ANOK The top was tilting, what can the pivot do to change that motion other than collapse underneath it? Problem is the pivot point didn't fail, that would have sent the top off the side of the building, the whole building failed equally in all directions around it's circumference, not just the pivot side of the tilt. It fell symmetrically from asymmetrical damage, which is physically impossible by itself.
Originally posted by ANOK
You are not claiming the towers fell with no resistance? How about proving to me they did? How can you seriously argue they didn't?
Originally posted by adam_zapple
Did they make noise when they collapsed? Then there was resistance.
After 21 plus years, yes, I know a little about the subject. You on the other hand continue to show a distinct lack of proper research. Rumsfeld's press conference was speaking about 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions reaching back over forty years that were not properly accounted for. He was not speaking about two billion in cash.
THE WAR ON WASTE
Defense Department Cannot Account For 25% Of Funds — $2.3 Trillion
On Sept. 10, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on foreign terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy," he said.
He said money wasted by the military poses a serious threat.
"In fact, it could be said it's a matter of life and death," he said.
Rumsfeld promised change but the next day – Sept. 11-- the world changed and in the rush to fund the war on terrorism, the war on waste seems to have been forgotten.
Just last week President Bush announced, "my 2003 budget calls for more than $48 billion in new defense spending."
More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends.
"According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted.
$2.3 trillion — that's $8,000 for every man, woman and child in America. To understand how the Pentagon can lose track of trillions, consider the case of one military accountant who tried to find out what happened to a mere $300 million.
"We know it's gone. But we don't know what they spent it on," said Jim Minnery, Defense Finance and Accounting Service.
Minnery, a former Marine turned whistle-blower, is risking his job by speaking out for the first time about the millions he noticed were missing from one defense agency's balance sheets. Minnery tried to follow the money trail, even crisscrossing the country looking for records.
"The director looked at me and said 'Why do you care about this stuff?' It took me aback, you know? My supervisor asking me why I care about doing a good job," said Minnery.
He was reassigned and says officials then covered up the problem by just writing it off.
"They have to cover it up," he said. "That's where the corruption comes in. They have to cover up the fact that they can't do the job."
The Pentagon's Inspector General "partially substantiated" several of Minnery's allegations but could not prove officials tried "to manipulate the financial statements."
Twenty years ago, Department of Defense Analyst Franklin C. Spinney made headlines exposing what he calls the "accounting games." He's still there, and although he does not speak for the Pentagon, he believes the problem has gotten worse.
"Those numbers are pie in the sky. The books are cooked routinely year after year," he said.
Another critic of Pentagon waste, Retired Vice Admiral Jack Shanahan, commanded the Navy's 2nd Fleet the first time Donald Rumsfeld served as Defense Secretary, in 1976.
In his opinion, "With good financial oversight we could find $48 billion in loose change in that building, without having to hit the taxpayers."
Khaled Sheikh Mohammed
Mohammed Atta
Ayman al-Zawahiri
Shall I continue?
In China's Guangdong province, residents watch helplessly as a 26-storey half-built skyscraper burns. The cause of the blaze, which lasted for four hours, is unknown.
Originally posted by adam_zapple
No...you seem to think that the path of least resistance is off to the side...I'm just trying to show you how silly that assumption is.
Why wouldn't the same thing happen in the towers?
Gravity.
Symmetrically? Which building are we talking about here?
Did they make noise when they collapsed? Then there was resistance.
Now as of the missing money where dose it say It goes as far as 40 years that this money 2.3 trillion took to be missing? Please post your sources to this info.
Originally posted by lycopersicum
do some research on thermal dynamics
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by adam_zapple
No...you seem to think that the path of least resistance is off to the side...I'm just trying to show you how silly that assumption is.
No I don't, not in your diagram. I already said the sphere would go straight down until it hits the block, learn to read. But yes in the case of the wtc towers the air around them is the path of least resistance, when they are collapsing onto themselves. The building itself would be the path of most resistance. You are trying to prove one thing with something entirely different. Sorry but I'm not the one being silly here
Originally posted by ANOK
Why wouldn't the same thing happen in the towers?
Do I have to keep explaining the same thing over? I already answered this question more than once..
Originally posted by ANOK
Gravity.
Gravity is not a force that can overcome resistance. If that was the case no building would stand in the first place.
Originally posted by ANOK
The force of gravity is extremely weak compared to thousands of tons of welded and bolted steel columns.
Originally posted by ANOK
Symmetrically? Which building are we talking about here?
I was talking about the tilt of wtc2 sry I might have got off track. I used it as an example of something earlier...But anyway all three buildings fell symmetrically from asymmetrical damage. Show me ONE other building, ever in history, that has collapsed symmetrically to its foundations from asymmetrical damage.
Originally posted by ANOK
Did they make noise when they collapsed? Then there was resistance.
LOL. The buildings fell at near free-fall speed, the amount of resistance/friction that caused sound is negligible. When I say resistance I mean the thousands of tons of bolted and welded steel columns that just gave way symmetrically, in all 3 buildings, an unprecedented act in all the history of known construction, and the total breakdown of known physics.
Originally posted by Intothepitwego
Originally posted by adam_zapple
Did they make noise when they collapsed? Then there was resistance.
It fell at the speed of gravity.[b/] How terribly weak the lower portions must have been to fall apart so easily but hey, at least it made noise.
Originally posted by esdad71
Gotcha...come on folks, I am just looking for the answer to 2 simple questions. Just two that in my mind sum up the entire WTC 7 conspiracy. I have asked these in so many threads and it kills them quite a bit so I am wondering if I am hitting a nerve.
1. Why did the government wait so long to take out WTC 7? Would it have not been beneficial for them to set off the mysterious invisible explosives when the other towers collapsed? (This is a simple logistical question, I do not want to hear about big oil)
2. WHERE is the evidence of explosives? I don't care if you used a top secret explosive...there would be residue or at least one relay/switch/terminal that would have assisted with the explosion. However, there is nothing.
I will accept answers from trolls, trannies, truthers , commies, pinkos and evening bible thumping republicans viewpoint. I am just trying so hard to see what so many of you in these forums sees. I mean, if you wanted to create a piece of fiction that is one thing but please, convince me without links to garbage propaganda websites. I implore you.