Blasters approach each project a little differently, but the basic idea is to think of the building as a collection of separate towers. The blasters set the explosives so that each "tower" falls toward the center of the building, in roughly the same way that they would set the explosives to topple a single structure to the side. When the explosives are detonated in the right order, the toppling towers crash against each other, and all of the rubble collects at the center of the building. Another option is to detonate the columns at the center of the building before the other columns so that the building's sides fall inward.

Not tilting over? Really? I don tknow, it looks like its tilting towards the south pretty obviously from this angle. And I dont really see it falling into itself either. More like its falling down and towards the south with a southerly tilt.

reply to post by GenRadek

Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by esdad71

---

why would i even consider proving this to you.i don't care about you. in fact i don't like you,and i'm damn glad such a tailwaging traitor to the constitution dosn't believe 911 was an inside job. i hope you never buy our b.s. i want you right where you are. i'm tired of being stabbed in the back by people like you, but please do get a life .go campin, get raped by
bigfoot. do some freak'in thing w/ yourself.

Originally posted by esdad71

Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by esdad71

---

Fact is, there is ABSOLUTEY NO evidence of explosives.

FACT IS...there is NO EVIDENCE of the fires that NIST says there were, nor ANY evidence to support their HYPOTHESIS...NO steel to examine
...dismissed ALL explosives, BASED on ONE TYPE...RDX the loudest and most concussive, to eliminate ALL the THOUSANDS of different combination's.....NO TESTING...just SOMEONE'S PERSONAL opinion, that they would have been TOO LOUD.....very scientific

We have some cured paint chips that dripped micro steel balls and nothing else. No peer reviews.

lol..paint chips that dripped micro steel balls?.....EXPLOSIVE chips, and perfectly round spheres of IRON...not steel...THROUGHOUT the dust...at ONE point the iron was molten, in order to form perfectly round spheres while flying through the air...HOW does THAT happen?

give me your proof man? that is what this forum is about. What can you possible have that would prove explosives. I triple dog dare you

Why is there NO pics of ANY fire that NIST says occured, in the WTC7 report?

[NCSTAR1A-3.2]"It is likely that much of the burning took place beyond the views of the windows"

lol..HOW does THAT effect the perimeter columns to offer NO RESISTANCE in order to get free fall ACCELERATION...if there is something there it HAS to offer resistance

-[NICSTAR 1A 3.6]"constant, downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was 32f/s^2,(9.8m/s^2), equivalent to the acceleration of gravity.
This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories or 32 meters,(105ft.), the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0 s.

as soon as the kink is formed, the HVAC, 'other' Penthouse, roof, facade, within 0.5 seconds from each other, have free fall ACCELERATION for 100+ft. ALL support was INSTANTLY taken away, AS WE SEE by the EVEN decent
if there was a progression from east to west
WE WOULD SEE IT
the roof WILL NOT support itself while columns fail below it. the facade is a non supporting structure, and IS attached to the perimeter columns it will not stand while the columns fail behind it.

So...how do you get,'EVERY' column to act the same way, at the same time, unless they are under the 'SAME' conditions, and acted on by the 'SAME' force???

as soon as the kink is formed, the 'ENTIRE' building,evenly falls at 9.8m/s^2 for 2.25 seconds,(t=1.75s to t=4.0s [NICSTAR 1A 3.6])

Acceleration of gravity...at 4.0s of the collapse, the 'ENTIRE 'building is falling faster than 80 ft.a second...'ONLY' possible by removing 'ALL' resistance...nothing in the way

Shyam Sunder the lead investigator for the NIST said this about free fall acceleration, durring the Q&A news briefing at NIST, BEFORE the final report came out.....when there was NO mention of free fall ACCELERATION occurring in 7

"free fall acceleration can ONLY occur when there is NO STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BELOW IT"

watch?v=V0GHVEKrhng&feature=channel_page



but....the problem is....WE SEE the ENTIRE building, falling EVENLY, AS FAST AS AN OBJECT CAN FALL THROUGH THE AIR,(9.8m/s^2), WITH no resistance OF any kind...SO where did the vertical support go to ACROSS the building to get the result WE ALL SEE?
[edit on 1-7-2009 by esdad71]