reply to post by esdad71
1. Don't you mean why did individuals within the government wait so long to bring the WTC 7 down? I'm pretty sure my local United States Post
Office, a part of the government, had nothing to do with WTC 7's collapse.
Great question. Perhaps plane number 3 was suppose to hit that building. Perhaps the perps counted on WTC 1 and 2 doing more damage to mask the CD
implosion.
2. What evidence is there of explosives? I can point you to steel that has had a high temperature attack on it turning it into swiss cheese. See FEMA
study. See Journal of Materials publication. I can offer video/audio recordings of explosion that sounds like a clap of thunder and firefighters
standing near a phone heard stating the builidng is about to blow up.
What I can not give you is a government scientific report by FEMA, NIST, or BATF that used forensic chemical testing on steel samples to prove
conclusively that no explosives were used.
Can you offer these forensic tests that show a result of no explosive residues were found in the steel samples? Let me answer that one for you:
No tests were done to prove or disprove the use of materials. Considering the unprecedented collapse of this building, this is the FIRST thing that
should have been done to the steel samples. It was not. And it never will be.
I wasn't led to this conclusion via conspiracy website, mind you, but rather fire officials and FEMA:
Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the "official investigation" blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is
a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full
disclosure. Except for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee
members- described by one close source as a "tourist trip"-no one's checking the evidence for anything.
And to no ones surprise, the following prediction came true!
As things now stand and if they continue in such fashion, the investigation into the World Trade Center fire and collapse will amount to paper- and
computer-generated hypotheticals.
Keep in mind NIST's computer-generated hypothetical did not match reality.
So you see, the very plausible and most likely cause of WTC 7 demise was via controlled demolition. The forensic evidence that has been examined by
FEMA was NEVER examined by NIST. This evaporated steel points to a thermite or variant type of attack on the structure.
Until a comprehensive collection of steel samples from WTC 7 is forensically tested for explosive residue to prove one way or another, this line of
inquiry and investigation remains completely valid and indeed necessary.
Now where is all that WTC 7 steel?
Fire Engineering explains quite nicely:
Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist Fire? Did they throw away the gas can used at the Happyland Social Club Fire? Did
they cast aside the pressure-regulating valves at the Meridian Plaza Fire? Of course not. But essentially, that's what they're doing at the World
Trade Center. For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap.
Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat
to China, perhaps never to be seen again in America until you buy your next car.
And I might add the ability to test for explosive residues as is called for in fire related crimes.
Work in the same office maybe?
