California Sex Offenders Now Tracked By GPS, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 13-1-2009 @ 03:56 PM by kawz1

California Sex Offenders Now Tracked By GPS


cbs5.com
Thousands of sex offenders on parole in California are now being tracked by GPS devices, at a high price to taxpayers.

Outfitting nearly 7,000 sex offender parolees cost the state nearly $10 million, and the 24 hours a day, seven days a week tracking is costing another $14.5 million per year – that comes out to $6 per parolee, per day. Compare that to prisoners, each of whom costs taxpayers $96 a day behind bars.
(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 04:28 PM by tezzajw
Originally posted by kawz1
This is an interesting article. I personally feel that sex offenders are scum, but does this violate their right to privacy?

It is an invasion of privacy!

If the sex offender has been released from prison, then that means the state feels that they are no longer a danger to society!

Here's a thread that's also breaking news where children's wristwatch GPS locators are being marketed for their 'safety'.

ANY form of GPS monitoring is a breach of privacy.

The NWO start by saying that children will be safer, when monitored. Then, they'll say that we better monitor the sex-offenders, few will object. Then it will be monitoring convicted murders, etc after they are released. Naturally terrorists and gang leaders will need monitoring, as they cause unrest in the community. Similarly, burglars will need to be watched. After that, repeated drunk drivers will need monitoring to see if they are driving, or not. Anyone who dares question their parking ticket will need monitoring. Finally, anyone who is born human will also need to be monitored, not only for their own safety, but to prevent against the crimes that they are going to commit.

RESIST THIS NOW!

[edit on 13-1-2009 by tezzajw]


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 05:21 PM by burdman30ott6
reply to post by Finn1916



Convicted felons have no rights, nor should they.

That said, at some point the economics of the situation must be weighed against the alternatives. A simple bullet to the head of repeat offenders saves our tax dollars and effectively protects the population.


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 06:46 PM by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by logician magician
ATS' imagination running wild again.

Mention something about sex offenders being tracked, and you end up with people professing that newborns will be next.

With ATS, it always ends up with newborns NO MATTER WHAT is being tracked.

Start a thread about cardboard boxes being tracked on the way to the grocery store, and you'll get reply after reply from people saying that "this is just the beginning! I'll fight to the death for my liberty!"

I bet this type of slippery-slope attitude dominates some members lives here:

Wife: "Honey, do you want to watch a movie tonight?"

ATS: "Whats next?! YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOVIE!?? YOU WANT TO BUY A MOVIE STUDIO!? YOU WHORE, GET OUT OF MY LIFE!!! I NEVER TRUSTED YOU!"





Are you really that dense?... why do you think "sex offenders" are the test for it?... because they are universally hated , even in prison. I don't know but maybe MURDERERS would be the 1st logical choice... But You're the Logician Magician so maybe YOU can fill me in.

People don't care about sex offenders and people like yourself can't see where this is going so they say YEAH!!! tag em. Then It goes to Murderers , and then Drug offenders and then the guy that got the DUI and then the guy that smoked under the no smoking sign.

Things such as this are instituted in steps. (to test the water) and then eventually... and it will happen (under the guise of public safety no doubt) It will trickle down to you and I. Well maybe you...

What you don't understand is once a right is given up... IT'S GONE!!! there is no going back. I simply don't believe the government has a right to track its citizens by gps (does that make me crazy?). Take the label "sex offender" off and thats what you have. The government tracking it's people by gps.



[edit on 13-1-2009 by EyesWideShut]



reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 10:31 PM by logician magician
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by logician magician



Are you really that dense?... why do you think "sex offenders" are the test for it?... because they are universally hated , even in prison. I don't know but maybe MURDERERS would be the 1st logical choice... But You're the Logician Magician so maybe YOU can fill me in.


I can see you're back there in la-la land. Look, murders stay in prison for much longer than sexual offenders - if sexual offenders even goto prison at all.

Sex offenders outnumber murderers by and repeat sexual offenders outnumber serial killers by .

I mean, are you seriously suggesting that we put tracking devices on the least likely to happen dangerous crimes? Out of all major crime in the United States, murder comes in last at an average of 17,000 per year. The next slow up is RAPE (not to include all other sexual crimes) at 90,000 per year.

You see, when someone gets murdered, the idea of justice is transferred to a 3rd party (e.g family). When someone gets sexually assaulted, raped, anally tortured but left alive... well, justice will be served to a living, breathing human being - the one and only, put your hands together... she deserved a big round of applause, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome the 12 year old who got raped.


People don't care about sex offenders and people like yourself can't see where this is going so they say YEAH!!! tag em. Then It goes to Murderers , and then Drug offenders and then the guy that got the DUI and then the guy that smoked under the no smoking sign.


Sure, and then it goes on people who don't wear their seat belts, and then it goes on newborn babies. Obviously, you know nothing of logic... just like the rest of the "slippery-slope" sycophants around here.


Things such as this are instituted in steps. (to test the water) and then eventually... and it will happen (under the guise of public safety no doubt) It will trickle down to you and I. Well maybe you...


Wow, that's some great insight you have there. Did you learn it when you were on the short bus?



What you don't understand is once a right is given up... IT'S GONE!!! there is no going back.


God forbid that the murderers don't have to give up their right not to be tracked like you suggested earlier.


I simply don't believe the government has a right to track its citizens by gps (does that make me crazy?). Take the label "sex offender" off and thats what you have. The government tracking it's people by gps.


It doesn't matter what you believe as a single person. It matters what the voters of California think who voted to have this implemented.

waiting for, "Oh! The voters never voted on it! It was all a fake vote! None of it was real! just like every other law and election is this country!"


reply posted on 14-1-2009 @ 12:47 PM by kawz1
Originally posted by logician magician
It matters what the voters of California think who voted to have this implemented.

waiting for, "Oh! The voters never voted on it! It was all a fake vote! None of it was real! just like every other law and election is this country!"



To be fair, the GPS issue was just one component of Proposition 83. If you remove this from the prop, I would bet that those that oppose the GPS issue would enthusiastically vote to have this approved. If you stack a Proposition with dozens of good points and one controversial point, most people will vote in its' favor in order to get the dozens of good points implemented.

Here are some of the other elements of the prop that California voters approved by a 70/30 margin back in 2006:

-Increases penalties for violent and habitual sex offenders and child molesters.
-Prohibits registered sex offenders from residing within 2,000 feet of any school or park.
-Expands definition of a sexually violent predator.
-Allow law enforcement to act as decoys to catch internet predators
-Changes current two-year involuntary civil commitment for a sexually violent predator to an indeterminate commitment, subject to annual review by the Director of Mental Health and subsequent ability of sexually violent predator to petition court for sexually violent predator’s conditional release or unconditional discharge.

Proposition 83 - "Jessica's Law"

These are all great ideas which are supported by the vast majority of people. However, I believe if you were to have the GPS issue stand alone, you would not see the 70/30 margin as with Prop. 83.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 6 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags