Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT

Originally posted by SPreston

You do not know what CIT has done with the authorites to date nor is CIT required to inform you.

Precisely.

Even though this topic already exists here and again here and therefore will hopefully be locked I'll give the same answer that I often give every time I am pestered for an answer to this question.

We HAVE gone to both media and authorities both local and federal and we will continue to work hard to force them to acknowledge this critical evidence as long as they continue to avoid and ignore it.

Naturally the fact that they have chosen to ignore it has no bearing on the veracity of the evidence.

Facts are facts.
If CT'ers really had any facts, they'd be contacting agencies left and right.

Originally posted by Gonenuts
reply to post by jfj123

---

Facts are facts.
If CT'ers really had any facts, they'd be contacting agencies left and right.

They have! Who told you they have not?

Sorry, maybe I missed the area's where the CT'ers have posted what agencies they've contacted and with what proof and what responses they received.
Would you kindly point me in the direction of those posts on this thread? Thanks

January 4, 2008 at 22:06:24
View Ratings | Rate It
Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11
January 5, 2008 – Eight U.S. State Department veterans have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and called for a new investigation. “There is no question in my mind, that there is enough evidence to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of the kind we have not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, releasing a lot of documents,” said Daniel Ellsberg, PhD, in a 2006 interview with Jack Blood.

September 23, 2007 at 08:53:46
View Ratings | Rate It
Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report

September 5, 2007 at 14:33:52
View Ratings | Rate It
U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11
September 5, 2007 - U.S. Navy ‘Top Gun’ pilot, Commander Ralph Kolstad, started questioning the official account of 9/11 within days of the event. “It just didn’t make any sense to me,” he said. And now 6 years after 9/11 he says, “When one starts using his own mind, and not what one was told, there is very little to believe in the official story.”
Now retired, Commander Kolstad was a top-rated fighter pilot during his 20-year Navy career. Early in his career, he was accorded the honor of being selected to participate in the Navy’s ‘Top Gun’ air combat school, officially known as the U.S. Navy Fighter Weapons School. The Tom Cruise movie, “Top Gun” reflects the experience of the young Navy pilots at the school. Eleven years later, Commander Kolstad was further honored by being selected to become a ‘Top Gun’ adversary instructor. While in the Navy, he flew F-4 Phantoms, A-4 Skyhawks, and F-14 Tomcats and completed 250 aircraft carrier landings.

September 6, 2007 at 20:48:25
View Ratings | Rate It
Former Congressional Office of Technology Assessment Senior Staff Member Calls for New Investigation of 9/11

Respected Leaders and Families Launch 9/11 Truth Statement Demanding Deeper Investigation into the Events of 9/11

New Paper in the Journal of 9/11 Studies
Thursday, January 15th, 2009 Posted in | No Comments »

Steven Jones writes: The 116th peer-reviewed paper was published today in the Journal of 9/11 Studies: “The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis,” by Prof. Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti journalof911studies.com... This fine paper underwent several months of rather arduous peer-review ...

Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report
Gaps and inconsistencies reveal fundamental flaws in NIST's building collapse analyses
BERKELEY, CA (PRWEB) April 14, 2007 -- A group of scientists, researchers and 9/11 family members challenging the official reports of the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11/01 has filed a Request for Correction (RFC) with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
The Request asserts that the NIST Final Report violates information quality standards, draws inferences that are inconsistent with its own computer simulations and physical tests, and exhibits a significant bias toward a preordained conclusion while ignoring available evidence contrary to it. The Request also says that if this bias is corrected, the NIST simulation clearly indicates that the Towers should not have collapsed due to plane damage and fire. The obvious alternative, which the group says should have been studied by NIST, is explosive demolition.
The group submitting the Request includes 9/11 family members Bob McIlvaine and Bill Doyle, physicist Steven E. Jones, former UL manager, Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage, AIA, and the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice.

A PDF of the Request for Correction is available here:

Whitewash as public service:
How The 9/11 Commission Report defrauds the nation

9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, The
A Critique of the Kean-Zelikow Report
David Ray Griffin

The Destruction of the World Trade Center:
Why the Official Account Cannot Be True

The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie

Propping Up the War on Terror
Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories
KEVIN RYAN
March 28, 2006

Matter of New York Times Co. v City of New York Fire Dept.
In the Matter of The New York Times Company et al., Respondents-Appellants,
v
City of New York Fire Department, Appellant-Respondent. Catherine T. Regenhard et al., Proposed Intervenors-Petitioners-Respondents-Appellants.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered February 13, 2003, which, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding brought by a newspaper and a journalist against the New York City Fire Department challenging respondent Fire Department's denial of petitioners' Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request for transcripts of interviews that respondent conducted of its employees (oral histories) concerning their activities at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 (9/11), and for audio tapes and transcripts of 911 calls and internal radio dispatch calls made on 9/11, (1) denied the motion of nine family members of persons who died on 9/11 for leave to intervene as petitioners (Family Members), and (2) directed disclosure of the oral histories albeit redacted to delete the employees' personal expressions of feelings, opinions and recommendations, and (3) directed disclosure of the internal radio dispatch tapes and transcripts albeit redacted to delete the opinions and recommendations of respondent's employees, and (4) directed disclosure of the 911 tapes and transcripts albeit redacted to delete the words of 911 callers other than those related to the Family Members, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion to intervene, and to direct disclosure of respondent's employees' personal expressions of feeling contained in the oral histories, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Court prevents release of most September 11 emergency calls
The appeals court disagreed with families whose attorneys argued in a hearing last month in Albany that public interest outweighed privacy protection of those who died in the attacks.

Court Denies Access To
Firefighter's 911 WTC Opinions

9/11 Scholar files "Qui Tam" lawsuit against NIST

World Trade Center 9 11 Emergency Workers Lawsuit

911 Career Army Veteran v Cheney Et Al Law Suit

NY Judge Rules Against 9-11 Widow
Lawyer says court’s decision designed to suppress Ellen Mariani’s quest for truth
By Mark Anderson - American Free Press (Issue #51, December 17, 2007)

TO THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

The Judicial Hijacking of the 9-11 Victim Lawsuits

Scholars for 9/11 Truth petition to Congress

911 Victim's Wife, Ellen Mariani,
Files RICO Act Federal Court Complaint
Against President Bush and Cabinet Members

Victims' families renew request for 9/11
records

Legal minds respond to landmark 9/11 civil suit against Rumsfeld, Cheney

Originally posted by Gonenuts
reply to post by pteridine

---

I do not disagree with you, and you are right, but so fare no one has wrote anything to disprove Jones Hypothesis. I find it more credible, than what the government has given us and theirs does not stand up to simple science.