Mason, I'm curious how many hundreds of these skewered threads you can start.

When I first read the title of the thread, I thought instantly that the Gazans fire on Israelis, and then play the victim.

You mentioned 1948. Look at all the events of 1948, and you'll find that toward the end of the year, a coalition of Syria, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Transjordan, Iraq, Egypt, and large paramilitary groups invaded for the purpose of wiping Israel off the map.

You and your kind are exactly what keeps the fighting in the Middle East.

I guarantee you, if Israel didn't even exist, these turds would still be fighting among each other.

[edit on 13-1-2009 by dooper]

Thanks for the article masonwatcher.

When there's nearly a thousand dead, and 13 of them are Israelies, only 3 of which were civilians, I think it's clear who's the perpetrator and who's the victim.

Anytime casualties are completely one-sided, this is proof positive that one side is fighting smart, and the other side is run by idiots.

You don't bring a rock to a gunfight.

You do, and I guarantee you every single time, the casualties will be one-sided.

At Rourke's Drift, a company of engineers and dismounted infantry were building a bridge. Attacked by thousands of Zulu, the casualties were completely one-sided, in favor of the engineers.

You better be able to chew what you bite off.

And who suffers the most casualties has nothing to do with their innocence.

It defines their stupidity.

Originally posted by dooper

And who suffers the most casualties has nothing to do with their innocence.

It defines their stupidity.

Or their heroism. Depends on your viewpoint. According to you George Armstrong Custer must have been pretty darned stupid. You probably think the folks in the twin towers on 9/11 were remarkably stupid.

[edit on 1-13-2009 by groingrinder]

I guess those Palestinians must be breeding like rabbits. Because besides your concern of genocide, they are still around alive and kicking. And if you look to the West bank you will see about 2million Palestinians who haven't even been touched.

Originally posted by dooper
Anytime casualties are completely one-sided, this is proof positive that one side is fighting smart, and the other side is run by idiots.

You don't bring a rock to a gunfight.

You do, and I guarantee you every single time, the casualties will be one-sided.

At Rourke's Drift, a company of engineers and dismounted infantry were building a bridge. Attacked by thousands of Zulu, the casualties were completely one-sided, in favor of the engineers.

You better be able to chew what you bite off.

And who suffers the most casualties has nothing to do with their innocence.

It defines their stupidity.

Don't bring a rock to a gunfight? You do if all you have is rocks my friend.

It doesn't define their stupidity, it defines their resolve to fight for their human rights.

The casualty numbers speak volumes of Israeli hypocrisy.

Originally posted by dooper
Anytime casualties are completely one-sided, this is proof positive that one side is fighting smart, and the other side is run by idiots.

You don't bring a rock to a gunfight.

You do, and I guarantee you every single time, the casualties will be one-sided.

At Rourke's Drift, a company of engineers and dismounted infantry were building a bridge. Attacked by thousands of Zulu, the casualties were completely one-sided, in favor of the engineers.

You better be able to chew what you bite off.

And who suffers the most casualties has nothing to do with their innocence.

It defines their stupidity.

Yeah but when almost half of the people killed on one side are civilians what does that tell you?