Originally posted by whaaa
And do you not see that this is much ado about nothing. A transparent attempt to show the west that things are improving in Iraq when infact a
religious,
tribal civil war could break out and be more bloody than the last one.
I am going to post what I posted in an opposite thread in regards to the current situation in Iraq.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
What "success" are you talking about?
US troop casualties to hostile attacks are now less than 10 per month, a dramatic improvement
from as much as 100 deaths per month in the past. If a country of 25 million people were against the presence of US troops, why are only 8-10 US
troops being killed per month? Many troops report not having had to fire their guns even once in the last 90 days.
Iraqi deaths are low. The Iraqi people have taken responsibility for removing radicals from
their midst, which was the most fundamental objective for installing democracy in Iraq in the first place. Iraqi refugees, some who left as far back
as during the 1980-88 Iraq-Iran War, are returning to Iraq for the first time in years. Neither Iran nor Al-Qaeda are capable of causing major
violence in Iraq anymore.
The political process is stable. Iraqi elections have had high voter turnout with minimal violence, women are voting in full force. The Iraqi
parliament and judiciary system are functioning moderately well. There was scarcely a country more unlikely to function as a democracy, yet this
miracle has happened. We should be proud to have had the privilege to witness it. This will, eventually, lead to a domino effect of greater freedom
in Iran, Syria, and Jordan. There is little to no threat of a coup in Iraq. If you consider how many cultural, regional, and sectarian forces were
fighting against this outcome, the magnitude of this miracle becomes clear. What took Germany and Japan 25 years after their defeat in WWII, Iraq has
achieved in under 6 years. Iraqi politicians are corrupt, but so are American politicians. If Iraqi corruption is no higher than that of India (a
fully functioning democracy), that is to be considered a success.
The Iraqi economy is booming. This bodes well for Iraq. History has proven repeatedly that once a certain level of prosperity is reached, a society
becomes more interested in economic activity than destabilizing violence, and the general public will unite to combat elements that are bad for
business. Iraq is not at this level yet, but is on track to approach it rapidly.
Iraq's real GDP continues to grow at about 7% a year. Iraq's exports of oil are increasing, and the revenue amounts to thousands of dollars per
year per Iraqi. Beyond oil, industries like financial services, telecom, and solar energy are taking root in Iraq for the first time. Internet use
is surging. Most Iraqis now have cellular phones, which is very complementary to the democratic process. The Iraqi stock market is functional, and
investor participation is increasing.
For the first time
in years, more Americans view the Iraq War as a positive endeavor than those who have the opposite view.
I only see massive failures and the worst is still to come!
That is because you hope for failure, you emphasize only bad news while ignoring good news...
The above is especially true of many posters here.
Iraq at the moment, is a success. I predict that Iraq will be the "south Korea" of the ME.
This BS will do absolutely nothing in resolving centuries of religious animosity.
This is nothing more than PR and propaganda. The Shiites, Kurds and Sunnies
are not going to kiss and make up just because some duffus recognizes Christmas.
Europe of 1900 was just as unsuitable for democracy as the Middle East of today. The history of Europe from 1600 to 1945 is just as warlike and
dysfunctional as the ME today.
[edit on 13-1-2009 by West Coast]