isn't is highly possible that the phrase "new order of the ages" on the back of the dollar bill is referring to the old nickname of america, being "the new world"??
And it did then have a complete new order. No monarchy, but presidency. Also, was it not designed after america got their independence? Breaking away from europe? so there we have a new order, in a new world, representing a "new, world, order"

Also, with the eye of houris in the brain, what are the shaded areas? I can only see two area's labeld, and the rest of the eye simply drawn on over the top.

As for the original post, im sorry but i believe it to represent more of a tear than an eye. I can see an eye when i look, but only because i want to see an eye, when i put logic to it, i can see its shape.

Good idea for a thread though, brings out debate.

The key thing here is that the all seeing eye comes from the egyptian eye of horus... This is what inspired it.. So if the eye was meant to be a ritual to symbolise the modern eye symbol.. in reality the symbol is the eye of horus as this is where it came from. Yes there is no way to prove that the ceremony was in fact designed to look like the eye...but there is always the possibility that it was...

i know that it originated from the eye of houris, but doesnt mean it has the same meaning, that could be why it is different.

We originate from apes (if darwin is right) but doesnt mean we are the same as them. Also, the eye has constantly been used in ancient symbolism, and still used today for many reasons. The eye is a strong way to represent anything, security, door to soul, spying, anything with visual attached to it.

I am not saying you are false, but that theres many aspects that need to be cleared up before we can make such a claim. I cant remember who said this famous quote, but "extraordinary assumptions require extraordinary evidence"

Originally posted by LiveFreeOrDie..

Originally posted by TravisT

Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Oh come on guys, you're looking for patterns and seeing them because you want them to be there. They are standing around a circular object, and so they took up that formation, seems perfectly logical to me.

I agree, and I'm just shocked by how many S&F this gets from one video of people forming around a circle. I guess if a mod posts this, then its 100% true in conspiracy.

I really miss ATS in the '02-'04 days, before people wold cry "witch" to any kind of shape, pattern, thought, or story they heard.

Deny Ignorance? Go figure.....

Ever consider the possibility that people's minds and eyes are just more open now to what may be happening around them? Actually, no , you probably wouldn't.

Do you not think this kind of paranoid thinking has been going on forever? "Burn the witch! Get the demons out! Jesus is returning this year!"

This isn't new thinking just because of ATS and the way the world is turning out. And its statements like, "have you ever considered that...no, you probably haven't", is why I'm so disgusted over this site.

Looks like an eye yes but it looks like a Pinecone even more. The pinecone is scattered through almost every culture representing the pineal gland. Even the vatican has the pine cone in front of an egyption secophogus. The pinecone is on the Popes staff as well.

David Wilcock is onto something here I dont care what anyone says.

Originally posted by Chadwickus


Actually the symbol is Novus ordo seclorum which is Latin for New Order of the Ages

IF it really meant New World Order it would be Novus Ordo Mundi


At the end of the day, you'll see what you want to see, as will I.


Cheers


[edit on 14-1-2009 by Chadwickus]

The symbol is Novus Ordo Seclorum? What is that supposed to mean? The latin phrase is just that, just a phrase thats part of the bigger symbol, just as "Don't Tread on Me" is a phrase below the snake.

New Order of the Ages can't mean New World Order? Are you trying to say that because the the wording doesn't say "New World Order" precisely then it can't mean that?

Originally posted by TravisT
Do you not think this kind of paranoid thinking has been going on forever? "Burn the witch! Get the demons out! Jesus is returning this year!"

This isn't new thinking just because of ATS and the way the world is turning out. And its statements like, "have you ever considered that...no, you probably haven't", is why I'm so disgusted over this site.

There is a big difference between witch burning and the probability that there is a group of people that want to control the world and everyone in it.

Witch burning was hysterical paranoia without basis in documented evidence.

There is documented evidence that supports the theory that there is/are a group/groups of people that want to control the world and all of us in it and that they are occult oriented. Groups like the Bilderbergers, the CFR and others are real and evidence of their agendas are in plain sight.

Look at history. What was the British Empire trying to achieve at it's peek? What was the Roman Empire trying to achieve? World dominance, control of everyone and everything in it.

ATS originated as a forum for people to present theories such as this and others. These organizations and agendas have existed long before ATS has. ATS coming along has nothing to do with making people think these things. It is simply a place to discuss them.

I think that the fact that you ridicule and mock those that at least acknowledge that theories presented in this forum are possible as well as people's religous beliefs proves my point.

[edit on 14-1-2009 by LiveFreeOrDie..]

Originally posted by LiveFreeOrDie..
New Order of the Ages can't mean New World Order? Are you trying to say that because the the wording doesn't say "New World Order" precisely then it can't mean that?

Well, in short, no!

Novus Ordo Mundi = New World Order.
Novus ordo seclorum = New Order of the Ages.

yes but history is history unless we learn from we can not get to the future the ritual performed on 9/11 wasnt paranoia it did happen

and jsut because someone usess the phrase have you considered

maybe they where just not up on ancient history so dont fault the whole site or the OPer for not being up on ancient history and other people awareness of ancient history

alot of people make the mistake and think (if i dont know they must not know )

if you know what i mean

but still dosent change the fact that it was ritualistic in nature and the whole day initself was related to their belief 9-11-4001 bc being day of creation is a very very important day in ancient history

very well said.

Coincidence - or not - I'm not willing to give anyone the benefit of the doubt any longer...
This time especially.


*P*E*A*C*E*