To staunch pro-lifers : Is abortion always wrong?, page 9
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 08:36 AM by 44soulslayer
reply to post by FlyersFan



I thought you were ignoring that point:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Sorry for being a bit blunt. Im a bit irritable as I had to rebutt the ad-hominems of a communist on another thread


Yes indeed certain people can only survive with the help of others. Though that help is willingly given.

A fetus must be supported for 9 months by a woman, and she must have the choice whether or not she aids the fetus' development by carrying it.

Helping an person with a disease doesn't impinge upon the life of anyone else. Making a woman carry a child she doesn't want revokes that element of freely given aid.

The massive, massive difference is that an ill person is sentient. A multiplying mass of cells is not. It doesn't hurt anyone if a fetus is terminated before a certain uncontentious point. At the 4-cell or 8-cell stage... what sentience do you see? What humanity do you see?


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 09:43 AM by Aleksander
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
reply to
post by juveous



So the sin is in the choice?

What about if the choice is between saving the mother's life or saving the fetus' live? Why does the mother's life become more important at that point?


Because shes a supposed contributing member of society. Because she was here first? Your going to kill a women to save an unborn child? How is that not wrong?


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:05 AM by 44soulslayer
reply to post by FlyersFan



Ok I see two distinctions:

a. That a woman must live with the consequences of her actions.

b. That the fetus should not be exterminated under any circumstances.


OK bearing in mind that I'm testing your system of values here (so please dont think Im just being difficult for the sake of it! ), what of the following scenario:

A woman is raped (ergo no choice involved). The pregnancy is detected at the 4-cell or 8-cell stage. Clearly this is clinically unlikely, but lets just assume that it is.

Then would it be ok to abort that 8-cell fetus? After all, it has no sentience... it literally is just a collection of 8 cells at that point (I've seen it myself under a microscope). There is no difference between that collection of cells and any other in the body. It doesn't have any physiological difference.



reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:08 AM by Aleksander
Originally posted by FlyersFan

Her Choice and no others.

So if I decide to stop your heart from beating then it's my choice and my right. Same logic. Both end a human life.

No I am not an unborn child and your right to stop my heart would most likely put you in jail, if I were an unborn child in YOur womb then it would be your choice. Not your choice if I were an unborn child in anothers womb.


Originally posted by Aleksander
Leave religion out of it. Right or wrong its a personal choice that another should not take away because it stomps on their personal beliefs.

The only religion I bring to the table is that it is not our right to take away someone else's life.

By your logic we should all be allowed to steal and commit murder. If all I that matters is personal choice then no consequences should be dealt for anything. Abortion painfully kills another human being - painfully stops THEIR HEART from beating. Since you think that's okay, then I can go out and stop anyones heart from beating. It shouldn't matter.



I don't see how you got that out of what I said above. I don't understand why you or most other people like to twist the topic to achieve your opinion. Your right it's not our right to take the life of another, nor is it our right to make that choice for anyone else as you and your group seem to want to do. Unborn whether right or wrong is soley up to the mother unless you for some reason think god is going to come down and say no you cant abort it, I mean thats what I get out of your argument right? So the only other person that can abort the child would be the mother. It's her choice and if she thinks it's a sin and does it anyway, well that would be on her conscience wouldn't it? How do you figure you have any right what so ever to tell another what choices to make?

I personally would hope my wife never goes the abortion route but I have discussed this with her and it for some reason she were to get pregnet and we have no way to support the child or it makes her un healthy in any way I leave the choice to her. I would much rather have my wife with me then a new born child. You might say thats selfish, but to me its selfish of anyone to let my wife die to bear a child or go homeless due to a child we had no right having cause we had no money to support it. Fact is people have sex, get over it and accidents happen. How are you to tell anyone what choices to make with their life?

[edit on 30-1-2009 by Aleksander]


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:13 AM by 44soulslayer
reply to post by Aleksander



Hey mate, we aren't debating the legality or coercion elements regarding abortion. That is to say, we aren't debating Roe vs Wade. I'm not interested in RvW... I will always be pro RvW even if I am personally anti-abortion.

The point of this debate is to identify the moral issues surrounding abortion and debate them.

I asked "Is abortion always wrong". Not "Should abortion be illegal". At the end of the day, that is a different debate in itself.

Here we are just trying to delve into some of the issues that a person might want to consider for themselves, and for them to take a personal stance on.

I was seeking illumination from the "other side". Let's not let this thread fizzle into another Roe vs Wade debate. The ethical and moral debate is so much more interesting!


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:20 AM by 5ive the light
reply to post by 44soulslayer



to give an opinion no as we are a collection of cells.(a few more than 8 but still!) where does this end ? i think thats what she's geting at. who do we get rid of next because they arent conveniant? do we kill a whole nation for who its government is or have done? ignorant people would'nt see that its not the subjects fault, they like us are subjected to it! it is not the unborne childs fault it is subject also
mr 50


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:23 AM by Aleksander
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
reply to
post by Aleksander



Hey mate, we aren't debating the legality or coercion elements regarding abortion. That is to say, we aren't debating Roe vs Wade. I'm not interested in RvW... I will always be pro RvW even if I am personally anti-abortion.

The point of this debate is to identify the moral issues surrounding abortion and debate them.

I asked "Is abortion always wrong". Not "Should abortion be illegal". At the end of the day, that is a different debate in itself.

Here we are just trying to delve into some of the issues that a person might want to consider for themselves, and for them to take a personal stance on.

I was seeking illumination from the "other side". Let's not let this thread fizzle into another Roe vs Wade debate. The ethical and moral debate is so much more interesting!


Sorry about derailing the thread. I would say at the end of the day if the women decided that she would endure to much financial hardship with nofamily to support her then I would say its ok.

I would also say at the end of the day if the unborn child is going to cause a health risk to the mother then yes its ok. Above all else right or wrong it is the womens choice to do what she wants with her body.

I would hope she talked with people and made an informed decision but still her choice. It would be in rather bad taste if said women used it as birth control or made the decision on vanity that would in my opinion be considered wrong bt not my choice.


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:30 AM by 44soulslayer
reply to post by Aleksander



Its quite alright RvW is an interesting debate too.

I think I agree with most of your positions.

The only thing stopping me from (personally) being pro-life is that I don't believe aborting a fetus pre-18/22 weeks is immoral. I was just trying to see if anyone can convince me otherwise.


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:38 AM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
I don't believe aborting a fetus pre-18/22 weeks is immoral. I was just trying to see if anyone can convince me otherwise.


AHA! A challenge! How about
this . If I were to tell you that a preborn child's nervous system is reponsive at 10 weeks - would that make you reconsider your position? Or that at 12 weeks the preborn baby can suck it's fingers?



reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:40 AM by 44soulslayer
reply to post by FlyersFan



Granted, Im posing a very, very tough question.

But why is it wrong?

I agree with you that killing something that is sentient is wrong.

But when it comes down to the cellular level, there is no question of moral hazard.

I guess this ties into the cloning question and debate also.

Perhaps the question to ask would be:

Why do you think life begins at conception?


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:44 AM by Aleksander
Originally posted by Aleksander
nor is it our right to make that choice for anyone else as you and your group seem to want to do.

We make that choice every day in the USA. We have decided to live by laws which say 'no murder'. We take away the 'right' of people to kill each other all the time.

True but as far as I know it's your opinion that it's Murder not mine. You can argue or spin it however you want it's still your opinion and that does not give you the right to make the choice for another.

It's her choice and if she thinks it's a sin and does it anyway, well that would be on her conscience wouldn't it?

Like I said - murder isn't a choice.

Like I said it's your opinion that it's murder not mine so Yes it is her choice.

Originally posted by Aleksander
it is the womens choice to do what she wants with her body.


That's what it boilis down to - and abortion isn't something a woman does to her own body. It's something she does to someone else's. She doesnt' stop her own heart from beating. She stops someone else's.


no it boils down to, it's being incubated in the mother womb which is her organ and hers choice to make. Just because you think its murder does not mean anything as again it is your opinion. She is aborting developing tissue in her Organ.

If she wants to kill HERSELF - that's her choice.
But she's killing someone else.


That last argument is just completely stupid. Your going to sit there and tell me that if a loved one was in danger of losing her life due to an unborn fetus you would tell her that her life is less important then the child so die and let the child live. Complete and utter BS!!!


reply posted on 30-1-2009 @ 10:45 AM by 44soulslayer
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
I don't believe aborting a fetus pre-18/22 weeks is immoral. I was just trying to see if anyone can convince me otherwise.


AHA! A challenge! How about
this . If I were to tell you that a preborn child's nervous system is reponsive at 10 weeks - would that make you reconsider your position? Or that at 12 weeks the preborn baby can suck it's fingers?


Certainly, that is interesting information. I would need to study much further into the issue to decide on a line for myself on this issue. At the moment, I think the line is 18/22 weeks since beyond that point, the fetus can live outside the mother's body. For me, at that point abortion becomes pointless and illogical (unless the fetus is severely deformed/ has an incurable disease).
Pages: <<  6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Only read this if you are quite young?
  Posted 7 days ago with 71 member flags
ATS It\'s all or Nothing!
  Posted 19 days ago with 37 member flags
The World Is Waiting On You To Liberate Yourself From Ego!
  Posted 3 days ago with 36 member flags
Crazy Sufi Wisdom: The Moon Is More Valuable Than The Sun
  Posted 6 days ago with 25 member flags
The Messages of Animals
  Posted 17 days ago with 24 member flags
PEACE To attempt the impossible...
  Posted 2 days ago with 23 member flags
I looked at my cash and realized a few things just now...
  Posted 17 days ago with 20 member flags
Something I Learned from Looking at my dog in the eye.
  Posted 14 days ago with 17 member flags