To staunch pro-lifers : Is abortion always wrong?, page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 08:54 AM by crmanager
Originally posted by 44soulslayer
reply to
post by crmanager



Look you histrionic berk, I said in my opening post lets keep things civil...

I don't take the label of being a eugenicist as overly offensive... there are worse things to be.

You are entirely contorting my entire position. If I were the parent of a child who would be born with, say EB, I would want to prevent my future child from suffering chronic, interminable pain. A normal life is out of the question.

Here is what EB results in :

The skin has two layers; the outer layer is called the epidermis and the inner layer the dermis. In normal individuals, there are "anchors" between the two layers that prevent them from moving independently from one another. In people born with EB, the two skin layers lack the anchors that hold them together, and any action that creates friction between the layers (like rubbing or pressure) will create blisters and painful sores. Sufferers of EB have compared the sores to third-degree burns.


Would you like to live your life with continuous, whole body third degree burns?

The difference between genocide and selective breeding is admittedly a fine line, but it is one worth exploring. What if we would select embryos to not have EB. Would you still be against that? If so, are your personal religious beliefs not incredibly selfish as they may result in a child having to live with unbearable pain their entire life.

My stances may be unacceptable to you, and you can liken me to Hitler as much as you want in an attempt to deflect from the real issue here- and that is the inexplicable and indefensible proposition that your religious beliefs are supreme and absolute, and must be imposed on all others.

Oh and by the way, only the mother can choose whether or not to have an abortion to cease the birth of a severely abnormal child.


Histrionic Berk? What the heck is that?

Answer the question who decides? What if Mom decides that the child has the cancer gene and that is a terrible life?

What if Mom decides that she wanted a girl? Who are you to tell her no?

Who decides what "suffering" is?

By the way, you are the ONLY person bringing religion into this conversation. Defending life is not religious, it is moral. So unless you are saying morals are only a religious aspect stop talking nonsense.

[edit on 13-1-2009 by crmanager]


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 08:56 AM by TasteTheMagick
reply to post by Clearskies



Yes I do know that adoption is different, however, I did some volunteer work and found out that sometimes, when there are too many children they get put in orphanages. At least here.

I'm also aware that it is a hard thing to do to get an abortion, but sometimes it's a better choice.


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 08:58 AM by Clearskies
reply to post by OzWeatherman



As sad as rape is and I've been raped,
Putting that child up for adoption is a good alternative to raising it.
The shame and stigma WILL not go away because you have an abortion.
Do you know how many children grow up normal after being the product of rape?
Many rape victims want to kill themselves as well, especially after being told it's their own fault.


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 08:59 AM by 44soulslayer
reply to post by crmanager



I cant believe you chose to focus on my casual insult rather than the issues... oh well

dictionary.reference.com...


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 09:01 AM by Clearskies
Originally posted by TasteTheMagick
reply to
post by Clearskies



Yes I do know that adoption is different, however, I did some volunteer work and found out that sometimes, when there are too many children they get put in orphanages. At least here.


"too many children in orphanages", agreed.
Do you think ADOPTIVE parents put them there? How did they get there?
You know many women who use abortion as a form of birth control have MORE babies, whom they don't respect, hence they are discarded or abused?

I'm also aware that it is a hard thing to do to get an abortion, but sometimes it's a better choice.

For who? The man?


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 09:06 AM by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by Clearskies
reply to
post by OzWeatherman



As sad as rape is and I've been raped,
Putting that child up for adoption is a good alternative to raising it.[.quote]

Until the child grows up and decides to find out who the real parents are, and finds out that they are the end result of a horrendous crime. Ever thought of those impacts


The shame and stigma WILL not go away because you have an abortion.
Do you know how many children grow up normal after being the product of rape?
Many rape victims want to kill themselves as well, especially after being told it's their own fault.


The shame may not go away, I can understand that....but why have to live another nine months with something that could be terminated before it develops into a living human.

Do you know how many rape victims have tried to perform abortions on themselves, sometimes ending with horrific results? I know of a girl that deliberately drove a car into a wall in hope that the steering wheel would crush her "unborn" child (result of rape). Unfortunantly, she lost more than what she intended including the use of her legs.


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 09:07 AM by TasteTheMagick
reply to post by FlyersFan



Your mocking of my points is ridiculous. You don't give me any reasons as to why what I'm saying is wrong, you're just saying "it's wrong because I say so" essentially.

How can you say that love isn't what matters here? The child is alive, but it is alive because of a hateful act, it is alive and has to suffer, it is alive and struggles to make it from day to day?

I don't think it's fair of you to make assumptions on what will and will not haunt a person. My mother had an abortion when she was young and she always said that it was hard but she knew she had to do it and that all she could hope for was that the soul be reborn into a better circumstance.

I know that in the same situation that's what would pull me through.


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 09:09 AM by Clearskies
reply to post by 44soulslayer



I was three months pregnant when I had my 'procedure'.
Yeah, I thought it was a blob of flesh. Unformed, squishy.
I don't believe that the morning after drug RU486? is without health dangers, as the embryo can become stuck and cause septicemia from what I heard.
Once in the womb, I think the embryo should be nurtured and protected.
I've also had a miscarriage. Not the same at all. I didn't have the guilt and shame as with abortion.
Oh BTW, I'm not catholic. In case you're from Europe and think ALL Christians are.


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 09:11 AM by 44soulslayer
reply to post by Clearskies



Thank you for your candour.

However don't you think that your experience is precisely that (ie your experience). Is it valid to extend this as some sort of universal experience across all womankind?

How would labelling women who have an abortion as immoral (or worse, illegalising it) help if the woman genuinely does not want the child. This is especially true in the case of a rape victim.

By suggesting that the woman is in an emotional state and incapable of making the "correct" decision... are you not merely saying that you know better than her?

[edit on 13-1-2009 by 44soulslayer]


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 09:13 AM by TasteTheMagick
reply to post by Clearskies



No, I don't think it's adoptive parents that put them there, that would be ignorant.

I'm not even talking about the man when I'm saying that sometimes abortion is a better choice and I'm not talking about women who are having more babies as a result of abortion, that doesn't make much sense actually.

What I'm saying is: It's hard, this I understand, but I think it's a choice that the mother of the child has the right to make. The man, especially in the case where the man wants to run off, he is not in control of the choice. If you want the child and he's got a problem with that, then by all means keep the child.

The man doesn't want the child, you do, oh well then. He's just going to have to live with it won't he? He doesn't have to carry the child.


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 09:13 AM by Clearskies
reply to post by OzWeatherman



I knew a girl, 16, who got pregnant from a boyfriend and punched herself in the stomach to get rid of it.
I don't know what happened after that. She didn't talk about it.


reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 09:16 AM by TasteTheMagick
reply to post by FlyersFan



The child is not fighting for it's life in its preborn state. And you can not use a "study" to generalize everything. Each person will be different.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Hey You...Yeah, You...
  Posted 5 days ago with 82 member flags
Amazingly powerful video.. The real you - Alan Watts
  Posted 17 days ago with 50 member flags
Matrix Unraveled ~ The Do\'s and Do Not\'s ~ !!!!!!
  Posted 12 days ago with 49 member flags
I Did 3 Bowls Today – I’m Flyin !
  Posted 10 days ago with 42 member flags
Animals Are As With-it as Humans (Animals Are Conscious)
  Posted 16 days ago with 41 member flags
Spirit Science; a full movie
  Posted 5 days ago with 21 member flags