Obama Says Recession Requires Scaling Back Promises , page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 03:12 PM by Mr Knowledge
reply to post by Stranded


You see, that's exactly why I never showed up to the poll booths. I refuse to support a government that I cannot trust. Many of us, for some odd, unknown reasoning, believed that Obama's mannerisms and promises exemplified those of typical politicians. Even I bought into the hype. Yet, something deep down within myself told me not to vote for the man. If he failed, I just couldn't hold the burden of his failures on my chest or in my conscience.

I will give him this much. He did say that it may take two terms for him to deliver on some of his promises. When he said that, I wasn't too enthused, but I felt like he expressed honesty and realistic thinking when he stated those words. (or perhaps he was just saying that by default to secure his second election???) It's politics so you must read between the lines and interpret what politicians are really saying.


[edit on 1/12/2009 by Mr Knowledge]


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 03:44 PM by Averysmallfoxx
reply to post by esdad71


you mention clinton....like he's the one that started running the debt up to the astronomical level of failure its at now....noooo. THAT was Bush. Clinton had us to the point where we actually had a surplus....Barack is just another sleezebag politician who had a couple aces up his sleeve.


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 04:13 PM by truthquest
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic


Heretic, you bring up a good point in that he simply said he would not accomplish his objectives at the pace he wanted. I suppose that does not count as a broken promise. But, hasn't Obama already renegged on his Iraq promise?

I think Obama's infamous "big test" will be to see if he will send troops to Iran. That will be an interesting test to see if he is actually worse than Bush, who would not go into Iran.

If I remember correctly, when Ron Paul started getting his spotlight, other politicians started copying his speaking about bringing back the constitution, and he even got other politicians mentioning the word "constitution" for posibly the first time in their political careers. Obama is probably one of those who had never in his life used the word "constitution" in a political speech in his life, I would imagine, as he regularly spits on it and tramples all over it despite the fact he once taught a class on it. So after Ron Paul got his fame here is what Obama did: not only started mentioning the constitution but was forced to lie and come up with a troop withdrawal date and said we would be out of Iraq within a year!

What happened after Ron Paul had been "contained" by the MSM when they did things such focusing on his support with strippers and conspiracy theorists? Well, Obama simply stopped any mention of the constitution for one. And next we'll find out he 100% intends to be in Iraq FOREVER as long as he can help it. Just like the other 140 countries we have troops in he wants there forever.

[edit on 12-1-2009 by truthquest]


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 05:56 PM by LiquidMirage
reply to post by jibeho



Wait a dagnam second, what happened to change we can believe in? Do you mean to tell me there won't be any change after all? Surely this must be Bushes fault!

Some how the brain dead zombies that spewed o-boy talking points for the past year are going to fabricate a way to pin the blame for Barack the magic negro's epic failure on Bush.


But, but, but...it's all Bushes fault...


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 06:41 PM by Anonymous ATS
just my two cents after reading the thread

last poster brought in adolf hitler and ... strange but ... i see ever more parallels between the two men (and between germany 1933 and the u.s. now)
i did not read jim marrs book about that (yet) but i think i know what his point is

- hitler was a charismatic speaker ... so is obama; also i read an interesting and eye-opening thread about obama´s use of hypnotic language here on ats. there is a link to a pdf on this topic. explained some things to me and also mentions hitler as using a high amount of hypnotic/trance-inducing language

- hitler unified the germans with his aryan ideas ... so is obama when he speaks about "one america", bipartisanship and the american dream

- hitler demanded the germans to set the "volksgemeinschaft" above the individuum ... obama now asks for sacrifices and wants an obscure civil force to be build up

- hitler declared state of emergency as soon as he could and with the help of a false flag op ... so will obama? ... just speculation but as we know the laws are there thx to W.

- the nazis, even before getting to power - terrorised normal people with their SA gangs (drunk idiots that beat people up) ... in the u.s. i think they are called DEA ;-) just kidding

- both faced (deep) recession when inaugurated

you will find more similarities when you dive deeper into this.


additionally:

obama, in my opinion, is a 'rockefeller puppet' as he is surrouned by biden and brzezinski - both cfr members. especially the latter seems suspicious to me as he is an expert for 'totalitarism' (did you notice that the designated treasury secretary is an 'expert' for the great depression). this is all like a bad movie manifesting in our reality.

on cnn they sometimes state that illinois is the most corrupt state in the u.s.? i dont know if this is right. it´s just ... if someone comes out of a corrupt system, how is the chance that he is not corrupt? adding up to that is the blagojevich-#.

dont take that all too serious but think about it! i also see that obama gives answers that sound good, nearly perfect sometimes. a politician, too good to be true ... i dont trust him either - even though ... i was considering it :-P

so what do you think ... shall we call him 'The Fuhrer of the 4th Reich'?

an european
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^