Life As We Know It Nearly Created in Lab, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 19 times


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 05:58 AM by 44drake44
reply to post by alyosha1981



I agree too. The imagination of the human kind is just like the fact that Aliens might exist

~~I'm talking about Aliens because im using Celestia.~~

Try to download this program, you can see the Milky Way in 3D, Every planets, I even saw a Giant sun (235 000 time bigger than our sun)


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 06:11 AM by 44drake44
reply to post by Averysmallfoxx


I agree, but is it really dangerous to know how our world have been created?

I dont think so.. It's would just be nice to Know how our Planet works, how it have been created.. But i still agree



reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 06:19 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by Averysmallfoxx



Your right! but thats where the problem lies, we all know that the second a military contractor gets their hands on any kind of "life creating" tech that they will automaticly start thinking " super soldier" and compartmentalize the heck out of the project and we would only see the "scraps" then the law makers would pass bills limiting the use of this "secret tech: to research status only. It is a shame but one can only hop that doesn't happen here And the only reason I mentioned the"little earth" was actually a mention to us I just used a comical approach to deliver a thought provoking message

[edit on 12-1-2009 by alyosha1981]


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 06:51 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by resistor



that was pretty good I didn't think of it like that but maybe he could "lease" some of that dirt? I don't know how they created the RNA, below is my favorite part

When these mutations occurred, "the resulting recombinant enzymes also were capable of sustained replication, with the most fit replicators growing in number to dominate the mixture," the scientists report.The "creatures" - wait, we can't call them that! - evolved, with some "species" winning out.


"It kind of blew me away," said team member Tracey Lincoln of the Scripps Research Institute, who is working on her Ph.D. "What we have is non-living, but we've been able to show that it has some life-like properties, and that was extremely interesting."

Indeed.



[edit on 12-1-2009 by alyosha1981]


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 08:06 AM by Willbert
I found it interesting at first.. but as I read on in regards to how they "evolved" I started to wonder just how "dangerous" this was. Life in general has it's check and balances.. sometimes things go amok and we come face to face with bio hazards created by nature. As to why they appear during certain time spams could be due to natures plan or "luck".

These experiments are in a controlled environment.. but only controlled in regards to "our" understanding of what may happen or cause us concerns.

Mixing the soup of life and stepping back in awe to what transpires just sends chills up my spine in regards to what they could create which nature may keep at bay naturally in order to keep life in balance.

Yay for our ingenuity and wow in how dangerous we are to ourselves and our surroundings....



For emphasis....
We are, to put it bluntly, locked in permanent evolutionary war with the earth's bacteria and viruses. Sometimes we mount an effective Big Push, making inroads against a particular illness. (Total victories, such as the eradication of smallpox, are rare.) On other occasions, the enemy breaks through our battle lines with catastrophic effects, and an epidemic - such as the flu outbreak that devastated postwar populations in 1918 - ensues. On our side, we have an arsenal of antibiotics, antiviral drugs, vaccines, pesticides and antiseptics to protect us. On their side, there is the simple, mind-bogglingly multitudinous nature of germs combined with their perpetual, random attempts to mutate past our defences.

Nature, the most deadly bio-terrorist of all

[edit on 12-1-2009 by Willbert]



reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 09:31 AM by saint4God
Originally posted by dbates
Sounds like they have it really pinned down to an exact science .

"He buddy, how do I get to the Department of Motor Vehicles from here?"

"Turn left, or maybe just go straight for 2 miles, or possibly just drive to another town, or it might just be in between your house and your neighbor's."


You're right on, but I have to admit I get a bit excited by possibilities sometimes myself. If you keep it a secret, often times others will try to get first dibs on the claim. As Thomas Edison could testify...


"For example, in 1874 - with the money he received from the sale of an electrical engineering firm that held several of his patents - he opened his first complete testing and development laboratory in Newark, New Jersey.

At age 29, he commenced work on the carbon transmitter, which ultimately made Alexander Graham Bell's amazing new "articulating" telephone (which by today's standards sounded more like someone trying to talk through a kazoo than a telephone) audible enough for practical use. Interestingly, at one point during this intense period, Edison was as close to inventing the telephone as Bell was to inventing the phonograph. Nevertheless, shortly after Edison moved his laboratory to Menlo Park, N.J. in 1876, he invented - in 1877 - the first phonograph.

In 1879, extremely disappointed by the fact that Bell had beaten him in the race to patent the first authentic transmission of the human voice..."
www.thomasedison.com...

[edit on 12-1-2009 by saint4God]


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 09:53 AM by Skyfloating
reply to post by saint4God



Im enthusiastic about our ability to create and concerned about our tendency to be irresponsible about it. Hopefully we'll find some kind of balance.


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 10:08 AM by alyosha1981
reply to post by Skyfloating



Balance is ideal, but what do you think would happen, in the extreme event that this discovery evolves into "mass creation" of any type, when the big corps get their hands on it?


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 10:11 AM by jdub297
reply to post by alyosha1981



Star and flag for exactly what ATS needs; more real science and thouhgtful speculation based on it, rather than pure spec without any factual basis!

Don't want to drift off-topic, but if you think about organic processors/computing, nanotechnology, and the self-replication described in your article, we could be on the verge of some mind-boggling developments (before 2012? ).


reply posted on 12-1-2009 @ 11:21 AM by numo16
reply to post by 44drake44



and why stop with a "little earth"? At that point they could create other types of environments, similar to those on other planets(i.e. methane atmosphere, extreme heat, extreme cold, etc..) to observe if life is possible in these conditions and how evolution would occur. This sort of study and experiment could lead to understandings about required conditions for life and how you may not "need" earth-like conditions for life to exist.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 7 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 18 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags