Continued from above post...
WikiLink for Sodom and Gomorrah.
WikiLink for Judaic Oral Law.
WikiLink for Muslims view on Moses.
Quote from 2nd Link "A.2 The Chapter of TaHa
(20.9-97) specifically(20.60). Moses said to them (the magicians): “Woe to you! Do not invent lies about Allah, lest He destroy you by a punishment,
and he who invents lies is doomed to fail”".
AND Here is a list of the references the OP uses below in the Thread RULES.
Deut 31:9 &
WikiLink for Maxims of Conversation
ATS/BTS Terms and Conditions
For the Purposes of this Thread YOU agree to the following A PRIORI conditions:...
[A Pure Given!] 1) That the Torah is infallible religious Cannon i.e... YHVH/GODS LAW!
[Exo 3:13-15] 2) That because of condition 1) that YHVH is Almighty GOD.
[Deut 31:9 & 24] 3) That because of conditions 1) and 2) that Moses is the sole author of the Torah.
You may Contend the following...
A) the version of the bible or Torah that the OP uses. Pls don't argue validity as the OP is fully aware of the KJV's taint. Just pick the version
you want to use and the OP will comply.
B) the context of the scriptures that the OP provides. You must provide valid proof/s as to any contextual distortions the OP has made.
C) that the scriptures the OP provides are contradicted elsewhere in the Torah! You must provide valid proof/s as to the existence and validity of
these scriptures if they exist.
D) the name of the prophet who fulfills the scriptural promise of one. You must provide valid proof/s as to why they directly fulfill those
E) any provably invalid reference site provided by the OP.
You may NOT Contend any of the following, for purposes of this thread only!
A) any of the A PRIORI Conditions set out above.
B) that the OP,YHVH,Moses or the Torah are WRONG! UNLESS you provide valid Proof (i.e. Burden of Proof Required:-SEE BELOW!)
C) the validity of the blueletterbible website or any other Biblical or other website I provide as a reference UNLESS you can provide Credible proof
that directly goes against their Validity as a reliable reference.
Acceptable Valid Burdens of Proof...
A) that the OP's proof/s was provided out of the context in which the Torah ment it. Professional Semantic reductionism required.
B) scripture from within the Torah that contradicts the OP's scriptural proof/s. Valid Torah scripture required.
C) Other proof/s of the promised prophet from elsewhere. Full and accurate historical account required.
D) 3 well vetted mainstream experts analysis and report's detailing the invalidity of such reference sites as credible and reliable.
ALL Maxims of Conversation and ATS/BTS terms and conditions shall apply.
In Closing Personal Disclosure: If you are going to believe in a Book of Laws then one had better uphold the least important of those laws as much as
one upholds the most important laws! OR what's the point at all? Hypocrisy? maybe! Conspiracy? Definitely!