...over the last decade there has been a significant increase in the number of people sentenced for carrying a knife. In 1996, 890 people were
sentenced for possession of a knife in a public place. In 2006 the total was 6,284. In the same period the number of those under the age of 18
sentenced went from 114 in 1996 to 1,226 in 2006.
Amid growing public concern, the government took the step in February 2007 of increasing the maximum sentence for carrying a knife from two years to
four.
BBC Source
For many years the UK has played a numbers game when it comes to sentencing. If you were sentenced to a term of 5 years and under, you would serve
only half the time. The only way to serve more than half would be through other offences committed whilst inside. The 2003 Criminal Justice Act
changed it again.
Since then, admitting guilt would get the standard automatic reduction of 33%. The 2003 Criminal Justice Act would then take another 33% off. The
mandatory 4-6 year jail term suggested by the UK Government is all smoke and mirrors to appease the tabloid media and it's public. 6 years becomes 2
before the knife carrying juvenile problem even walks through the gates of the prison. Add good behaviour and the current 18 day deduction due to
over-populated prisons and the deterrent has no teeth.
A serving detective runs a blog and says this...
Fines? Fines? Paid off with a nominal benefits reduction or weighed off for a day in police cells. Community Service, see the above regarding the
attitudes of those serving them. Asset confiscation? Failing in trumps. Right now, prison is an option that takes bad people out of the population but
even this is being diluted with it being very hard to get time served of over 5 years no matter how bad you are. Cough the job when your bang to
rights for the first 33% off and the Criminal Justice Act 2003 will lop off another 33% for you without your brief having to utter a word.
Source: Nightjack Blog
The kids that are carrying the knives and especially the ones that use them are'nt isolated entities. They come from communities within communities.
They know that the chances of being caught by the Police is small. They know that the chances of the Criminal Prosecution Service taking them to Court
is minimal. On top of that, they know that sentencing will rarely be custodial. If it is, it'll be short. They know this because they have friends
and family that are in and out of prison.
I think the Criminal Justice Act needs to be overhauled so that a 4 year sentence means 4 years. Good behaviour has to be considered because it
reinforces the supposed rehabilitation aspects of prison, but not to the extent that you serve a third. It's laughable.
I work with these kids. They are often excluded from mainstream education or just don't attend. They have broken families with pretty poor examples
of responsibility. There's rarely a wage-earner in the family. It's all welfare, social services, alcohol and weed. Coke is going at £20 a gram,
pills (X, Es etc) are £1-2. They aren't all bad people, but their actions can be.
Lock up the ones that are a danger to society and make sure the sentence is meaningful. The biggest thing, in my eyes, is to do something constructive
to reduce the underclass of England. It's a growing problem that won't go away by locking them all up. It's far more complex than a mandatory jail
term
[edit on 12-1-2009 by Kandinsky]