Originally posted by Lasheic
reply to post by platoslab
Question: How do the authors of the site explain the presence of an iron surface on the Sun in contrast to the recorded temperatures of the surface which are hot enough to vaporize iron? Further, we've observed sunspots moving at different speeds across the surface - indicating that the equator rotates faster than the poles.
[edit on 15-1-2009 by Lasheic]
Did you read the forum you linked to? The author (Michael Mozina from thesurfaceofthesun.com...) clearly explained his observations which were based on satellite data. I can see no major flaw in his analysis since they are consistent with the images and known physics. However, the gas model is not supported by current satellite observations therefore it cannot be accurate.
We should not forget the scientific method if we want scientific truth. Observations rule!
The iron layer should be below the photosphere and insulated by other elements protecting it from the extreme heat. Satellite data clearly shows that there is a lot of iron(iron arcs, solar moss).
There are satellite images that prove the equator does not rotate faster than the poles.
Highest heat measured originates from the outer gas layers! This observation is contrary to the gas model which asserts that main fusion reactions occur in the core. This evidence is enough to debunk the gas model. All of the real magic is happening on the outer gaseous layers! This should be obvious to NASA but somehow they continue to peddle the gas model and obfuscate it with theoretical nonsense.
I wonder, why would NASA want to hide the sun's true fusion processes from the public?
[edit on 16-1-2009 by platoslab]
And
insulting ATS member intelligence levels is hardly a way to win an argument around here 
