How can one tell if one is an"old soul"?, page 10
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times


reply posted on 15-1-2009 @ 03:03 PM by ziggyiggy
reply to post by LostNemesis



Don't think you are fair to say that! What is your authority on it!!!!!


reply posted on 15-1-2009 @ 11:22 PM by liquidself
I would have to say that I am very much enjoying this thread and thanks to the OP for starting it. To the thoughtful comments by Apacheman: I am not entirely convinced that the "soul" is purely electrical ; though I am convinced that that level of energy is entirely involved (and thouroghly downplayed by vested interests in the scientific establishment) and probably the most available to the current level of scientific assessment ( this is not an attempt at scientific trumping - rather the requirements of "soul: as defined result to my way of thinking in different conclusions). ( though one might want to go throught the assesment of how long an electrical residue could exist after it constituient conditions are removed, but i digress). I am at all time assailled by what you might call the most extreme of skeptical considerations ; whilst attempting to maintain my strong interest in these kinds of issues so please do not interpret me as attempting to throw cold water on these things in my view I am attempting to bring up logical and intuitional conclusions.

i would throw a wrench into the works now and say that there is much more to be learned about a given person than just their "soul age"; at least according the the Chelsea Quinn Yarbro books data. Also a previous poster mentioned something to the effect (i m too lazy now to look up the posters name on this thread) of consciousness being linked to multiple probabilities via the "alternate realities". I tend to think that this is a productive line of inquiry.



reply posted on 15-1-2009 @ 11:57 PM by apacheman
reply to post by liquidself



No problem with skepticism or questions: good questions clarify issues and expose weak points.

I agree that the soul isn't just electrical: there are things going on at the quantum level that can't be defined that way. When I think about it, it seems that the quantum level of the soul is the proper place to look for the source of premonitions and the like: it is the place where we are all connected, and by all, I mean the rocks, trees, and bird farts, too.

But electrical is a convenient shorthand to describe the more readily apparent aspects of the soul. The term is part of that language difficulty I mentioned earlier: it isn't precisely what I mean, but as close as I can get in English. I'm told that Hopi is the best language for discussing physics as their verb forms include vibrational state components. I wish I knew it. I'm familiar with enough different languages to know that I often drop into one of them for a word that fits my thought better than any English ones do; a somewhat disconcerting habit for my friends, unfortunately.

Ever since I first ran across string theory and the idea of multiple universes (a very long time ago now, bless the memory of John W. Campbell, a truly superb editor), I've wrestled with how that effects the concept of a soul: would there be one super-soul per person and we are a shard of that? That way leads to some very messy thinking and requires some pretty creative math to account for energy movement across the multiverses. I'm inclined to think if anything, there may be a super-shadow (see, take a bow, I hadn't thought of it quite like that before...thanks), a [reflection] of multiple me's.

I'm more inclined to believe that each multiverse would have a separate set of souls, would have to have, each attuned to the vibrational frequency of that particular universe of the multiverse, otherwise....like I said it gets messy over there.

But hey, I'm still trying to figure out this set here: if there's multiple me's out there, they're on their own, lol.

[edit on 16-1-2009 by apacheman]


reply posted on 18-1-2009 @ 06:30 PM by Liquesence
reply to post by pikypiky



I agree in that i disagree with the definitions put forth here regarding an old soul versus a younger soul.

Even though i think that, in a general sense, "souls," or similar patterns of energy that roughly define a "person" (or a series of like persons) are "reincarnated" (not specifically, but generally or partially or a composite of other "souls'" energies) and have to do with what a person learns. As an example, consider a typical human life, and the things that person learns during his or her life. Apply that to the concept of souls, and the totality of lives lived is equal (proportionally) to one human life; therefore, an "old soul" has to "live" multiple lives, and with each life gains something, learn something, so that it gets closer to "home," "true death," a return to "paradise," etc. Of course, it's ironic that these past lives are not remembered; it's more of an innate feeling.

Generally, and this is where i disagree with a few of the posts (but it's my personal experience), is that the degree of difficulties in life is proprotional to how old a soul is. The worse things that happen to you in your life, the older the soul. I feel that i have been around a long time (as a slave, a native american, etc) and i have had some bad things happen, although not as bad as some people (such as those during the Holocaust, those in wars, people in Africa, etc).

Of course, there is the--belief?--that old souls are cosmic beings, or star-children, who have elected to come to earth as humans for a specific purpose, and who knowing lose all identity of their former selves in order to become a human and experience "human-ness." These beings are sometimes said to agree to become a human in a particular painful situation to do a particular things that is either hard to accomplish to simply to overcome it.

Also, that when something happens in your life (say you are wrongly accused or persecuted, or you don't like to be told what to do (past slave), or you don't fit in), it makes you think that this has happened to you before. It's just a feeling, but it's a rather strong feeling.

How does one know if one is an "old soul?" Well, i am not sure that there is a concrete answer to that. I would say that your life experience, as you live life, will trigger things that make you feel unlike most people. This is why i disagree with the post that if you are content and well off you are an old soul. Old Souls, as i see them, tend to be outside the mainstream. They are not content with white picket fences and 9-5 jobs, but march to their own drummers, and generally do not fit into the mainstreem society (such as artists, poets, even some musicians).

That's kind of how a feel about it all, and it's hard to properly describe.

*Shrug*

Hope that makes sense to someone.


reply posted on 22-1-2009 @ 08:32 PM by Tayesin
Originally posted by apacheman
Originally posted by Tayesin
Question 1: There are no old or new souls. All souls came into being at the earliest dissemination of the universe/god/creative awareness. The only way a soul could be considered New, is if it is newly arrived to this experience world we call earth. Therefore, an 'old soul' is one that is already experiencing here.

Most people using the terms old and new soul do so to instill a feeling of spiritual superiority in themselves, so the usage is driven by unbalanced Ego.


With all due respect, this makes no sense from either a physical or metaphysical sense. You are saying that all souls were born simultaneously with no allowance made for population growth (physical) on the one hand and no room for growth or experience differentials on the other (metaphysical).

So far as the other...describing a reality doesn't necessarily involve ego, unbalanced or otherwise, any more than identifying a particular rock, plant or animal does. What's so superior about being old? That and a couple (! siiiiiggghhhh) of bucks will get you a cup of coffee. "Old soul", as I've pointed out before, doesn't naturally mean wise or good, it just means you've survived longer than most and are more aware of it than most. Most "old souls" I've met are healthily cynical, mostly humble, and fairly tight-mouthed about it. No big. I might point out that having a website through which to dispense the wisdom of the ages might point to a bit of an ego issue; that's just me though.

Hi Apacheman,
We do not have to include the creation of new souls just to fit the perception of physical population growth my friend. There are abundant numbers of souls on all worlds, many of which will make there way to Here sooner or later for the unique experiences this provides, just as we have and I am sure we will go elsewhere when we are finished with here.

Why would a perfect soul need to grow or evolve? If it's only task is to experience creations and in so doing supply the creative force with experience of itself, it would not need to evolve.

The comment on unbalanced ego is about the perceptions of self as being superior spiritually and therefore an old soul, as shown by the many who make such claims.

Your old soul friends may well find they are not to keep their mouths shut now, as it is time for sharing in the world in order to assist everyone in waking up.

My website is there for one reason only Apacheman, and that is to provide simple methods to awaken that work for the majority of people, to as many people as possible around this world who wish to try the methods. How about you? Will you try them out for 30 days too? You will be surprised at the clarity and strength you will find for yourself.

Also, you will find in reading info on my site that it is not the wisdom of the ages you see, much of it disagrees with the belief-systems we have been toiling under for the past 10 millenia or more. It is info that breaks through belief-systems in an attempt to clarify our previous misperceptions.

Be well my friend.

[edit on 22-1-2009 by Tayesin]

[edit on 22-1-2009 by Tayesin]


reply posted on 13-4-2009 @ 11:40 PM by OpusMarkII
reply to post by apacheman



if this is true , the annihilation of a soul is too horrific to imagined , those poor people . If a soul does exist I hope this part of your theory is wrong .


reply posted on 21-3-2011 @ 06:10 PM by Revosti
reply to post by Daniem



Wow,

That was incredible, I've always been interested in why people say they feel I'm "wise beyond my years", great breakdown of everything, I've re-read it over and over lol.


reply posted on 21-3-2011 @ 07:44 PM by ldyserenity
reply to post by alyosha1981



In some respects, we are all old souls, we have all existed before this life from day one, the big bang whatever you want to call it and will continue to exist forever and ever in some form or other. Well that's what I beleive anyway. However, I assume she meant you've been here more than a few times. I prefer to call those souls that have been here more than a few times seasoned veterans, rather than old souls because that makes more sense.


reply posted on 21-3-2011 @ 08:18 PM by starless and bible black
reply to post by alyosha1981


It's when you want to sleep with your Kindergarten teacher, but you realize that you're too old for her, or that she's too young.

Do you have a jillion lines streaking from your thumb, across your palm, criss crossing the life line?
edit on 21-3-2011 by starless and bible black because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



Paranormal photos: separate the wheat from the chaff.
  Posted 8 days ago with 67 member flags
Shared Dreaming Experiment
  Posted 13 days ago with 10 member flags
To those who can have OBEs
  Posted 5 days ago with 9 member flags
My Ghost Radar Predicts a Mega-Quake on June 15, 2012 at Noon!
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags
Bompa
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags
An Ancient Ghost Story by Pliny the Younger
  Posted 12 days ago with 7 member flags