posted on Jan, 11 2009 @ 11:31 AM
Good thing I'm not Dictorate of the US of A.
First off, let's consider how we got there. It's an inland country, which required us to pass over, waters, lands, and airspaces owned by other
countries. We could not have done so without their consent or blessing, even if it was simply by their act of saying and doing nothing about it, so,
they share in the blame and therefore we weren't entirely uninvited even if it was only Iraq that didn't invite us.
Secondly, Let's consider that we did what we did and allow that we didn't ask the Iraqi consent, therefore, why are we obligated to do so now?
I would put a lien against Iraq and all of it's assets and holdings. I would require a 20- 40yr. period of return on our investment. After such
reasonable period, considering they have a 56 Billion + net worth surplus, I'd start with that. If the time elapses and no sufficient return, that
is, at the least, one half to one third of our overall investment, I would liquidate their holdings and assets while retaining a lien against the
remainder until either all debts are satisfied, or, if it's determined the debt cannot be satisfied, I would take possesion of Iraq to make it a US
of A and alter it's Constitution and laws accordingly.
No one asks to invade a Country. They certainly don't ask to take one over. While it may be argued that the US of A is itself a debtor nation, I
would challenge anyone, what with all of it's nukes, etc. to really consider how likely this scenario would be applied to the USA itself. People
forget, ultimately we are all barbarians in the end. Civility is just a mask we wear to pretend we were right for being barbaric in the first place.
There would be no negotiation. Repay the debt or be taken over.
Personally, I feel only the ruling nobles would have issue with this. The people have been brainwashed to believe that they are supposed to enrich the
few. See how long they retain that doctrine when you enrich the masses instead.
There is only so much money in the world and everyone wants some. If you make more, it becomes less valuable. If you make less, the world becomes more
hostile for it. The only way, as Bill Cooper points out, to balance the books is through open ended projects and war creates that, further, it allows
you to kill the creditors. The less people, the less hands are out to be paid.
Law is without conscience. Iraq is a house. The USA is a hostile banker. Pay the mortgage or be forclosed and let the bank take ownership of the
house. It's pretty straight forward. Iraq may not have asked for the USA to invade, but, it assented when it took our money willingly as a result,
which made an implied and binding agreement.
Sound ruthless? That's real politics for you. Too bad logic will be displaced by sentiments which cast common sense aside for the intangible idea of
common decency. Sorry so cynical, it's one of them days. Ask me tommorow and you might get a 360 degree turn on my response.
[edit on 11-1-2009 by PhyberDragon]
[edit on 11-1-2009 by PhyberDragon]