It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Commissioner slips up, says missile hit Pentagon

page: 12
50
<< 9  10  11    13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 12:49 PM
link   
What I dont understand is how come so many people who think the official story tobe true believe its so damn easy to pilot a plane of that size and on top of that believe these "terrorists" who already had been deemed incompetent pilots attempting to fly much easier planes were miraculously able to find the targets they were after without any help navigating from air traffic control..... Seriously it would be like trying to thread a needle hidden in a haystack the size of our America.




posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 01:12 PM
link   
Hole in the 3rd ring of the pentagon..



How can the aluminium nose of an airliner survive to create such a perfect hole?
Where is any plane wreckage in the picture?



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 06:38 PM
link   
reply to post by UKWO1Phot
 


The official 9/11 story is very confusing.

Did the plane disentegrate on impact or not? If it did how could it travel through 3 layers of brick columns and knockout this wall?

How did the plane in washington d.c and shanksville disentegrate while still causing holes in brick and mud?

No blood was spilled in shanksville,pa.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by pinch

Originally posted by tezzajw
They're all laughing at us.


You got that right. Laughing at you because of of your creative imaginations. One of the definitions: "Mis"sile\, n. [L. missile.] A weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projcted (sic), as a lance, an arrow, or a bullet."

Read that again - "a weapon...projected" A 90 ton airliner used as a weapon on an attack against a building is indeed, a missile. A manned-missile, in this case. A car can be a weapon, depending on how it is used. A hammer can be a weapon. A pencil can be a weapon. An airliner can be a weapon.

So yes, we are ALL laughing at you and will continue to do so on a regular basis.

[edit on 10-1-2009 by pinch]
Yea and it is common to do so as well. I know I hardly ever hear the words Spear, Arrow, Bullet, Rock, Stick, Fist. I always hear people call them missiles.
Good God.



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 07:51 PM
link   
How come none of these authorities have ever flubbed and referred to the planes that hit the WTC towers as 'missiles'? Why is it only the plane that hit the pentagon was a 'missile'?



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 08:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by fleabit
When you are a conspiracy guy, it's easy to say "omg he is one of THEM!" to blow off any credible testimony. Everyone who doesn't agree with you is either lying, stupid, or 'one of them.' Happens here all the time in fact. It's astounding the # of 'disinfo agents' are on these very boards! Apparantly I am one (according to Fleece) in fact.

Even though the lying part is well-established, you claim you're only an amateur liar who just happens to spend his life trying to debunk the 'conspiracy nuts' and defend the good name of the BushCo neocons and the NWO.

How noble of you.


Originally posted by UKWO1Phot
Hole in the 3rd ring of the pentagon..



How can the aluminium nose of an airliner survive to create such a perfect hole?

Good question, especially considering that it passed through six walls of the Pentagon which are constructed of limestone, masonry and steel-reinforced concrete that's two feet thick.


Where is any plane wreckage in the picture?

Oh, haven't you heard? All of it disintegrated into confetti upon impact (except for that super-strong aluminum nose cone.)



They just don't make 'em like they used to.




[edit on 14-1-2009 by GoldenFleece]



posted on Jan, 14 2009 @ 09:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by wheazy
maybe the govt did do 9/11, but they did it with planes (missles), not explosives or any other majic tricks you conspiracy theorists come up with



Explosives? What explosives?



posted on Jan, 15 2009 @ 12:32 AM
link   
Anyone wonder WHY the date 911 or fully 9/11/2001 or 9/11/01 onally it seems odd it would happen on the the most remembered phone number in the us.
I call bull on this,
It seems like it was placed to happen just to stick into your brain?
hell I bet i just remember this because my elementary teacher was teaching us about calling 9/11 opps 911 during an emergency.


Really tho whats up with that..........

Anyone?.........hello



posted on Jan, 15 2009 @ 06:05 AM
link   
it was explosives that brought them down just think of the odds that both towers would fall in that way! It takes Months and Months of planning to bring buildings down like that but hey 2 planes 2 buildings brought down in txt book fashion!

1 in 10,000,000,000 prob less odds than that! cmon people that dont think explosives brought them buildings down wake up!



posted on Jan, 15 2009 @ 06:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Babblingretard
Anyone wonder WHY the date 911 or fully 9/11/2001 or 9/11/01 onally it seems odd it would happen on the the most remembered phone number in the us.
I call bull on this,
It seems like it was placed to happen just to stick into your brain?
hell I bet i just remember this because my elementary teacher was teaching us about calling 9/11 opps 911 during an emergency.


Really tho whats up with that..........

Anyone?.........hello


Actually the proper way to pronounce it in 90% of the civilised world is in chronological order: DAY/MONTH/YEAR
So that would make it 11/9/2001

But that's just semantics



posted on Jan, 15 2009 @ 08:17 AM
link   
And more to the 9/11 stuff, you see 11=two towers ...



posted on Jan, 15 2009 @ 10:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by amaxa
How come none of these authorities have ever flubbed and referred to the planes that hit the WTC towers as 'missiles'? Why is it only the plane that hit the pentagon was a 'missile'?


George W. Bush referred to the planes that hit the WTC as EXPLOSIVES


but we should ignore our leaders comments after all Iraq had everything to do with 9/11



posted on Jan, 15 2009 @ 11:29 AM
link   
reply to post by pinch
 


Grow up mate will you.

So if for example, i fired a cruise missile at the pentagon, rumsfeld et al would call it an aircraft or plane would he?

Same thing according to you.

Crash scene investigators always refer to crashed aircraft as missiles in your world do they?

At the airport, we all board our missiles to the sun eh?

Oh look! Up in the sky! Is it a bird? is it a errm..a..missile..err

I'm leaving...On a jet missile...nope.

It doesn't work..Missile is not a substitute for aircraft, plane or similar.

Forgive me, but you are either a shill (look it up), or just plain argumentative, if it's the former, *Snip*

spikey.

MOD Edit, Review These Links: Terms and Conditions
Do Not Evade the Automatic Censors
Courtesy Is Mandatory

[edit on 1/16/2009 by semperfortis]



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 11:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by GoldenFleece

Originally posted by wheazy
maybe the govt did do 9/11, but they did it with planes (missles), not explosives or any other majic tricks you conspiracy theorists come up with



Explosives? What explosives?


This film should have been played during the 9/11 commission hearings.
the evidence for inside job are overwhelming



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 01:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by pinch

Originally posted by tezzajw
They're all laughing at us.


You got that right. Laughing at you because of of your creative imaginations. One of the definitions: "Mis"sile\, n. [L. missile.] A weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projcted (sic), as a lance, an arrow, or a bullet."

Read that again - "a weapon...projected" A 90 ton airliner used as a weapon on an attack against a building is indeed, a missile. A manned-missile, in this case. A car can be a weapon, depending on how it is used. A hammer can be a weapon. A pencil can be a weapon. An airliner can be a weapon.

So yes, we are ALL laughing at you and will continue to do so on a regular basis.

[edit on 10-1-2009 by pinch]



Not once have I ever heard of a car, hammer, or a pencil being called a missile. Your simply using a play on words to fit your own theory.

If you think a plane and not something else hit the pentagon, then you've got no idea what the word logic means. You also, in my opinion, are completely blinkered. Why does ANYONE think it was a plane anymore???



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 03:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by distortion9

Do you?!

I SAW THE PLANES WITH MY EYES!


Sorry for the tangent but such tautology as the above tend to hurt my eyes quite I bit. I therefore have to ask what else you might have seen them with if not with your eyes???



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 03:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by pinch

Originally posted by tezzajw
They're all laughing at us.


You got that right. Laughing at you because of of your creative imaginations. One of the definitions: "Mis"sile\, n. [L. missile.] A weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projcted (sic), as a lance, an arrow, or a bullet."

Read that again - "a weapon...projected" A 90 ton airliner used as a weapon on an attack against a building is indeed, a missile. A manned-missile, in this case. A car can be a weapon, depending on how it is used. A hammer can be a weapon. A pencil can be a weapon. An airliner can be a weapon.

So yes, we are ALL laughing at you and will continue to do so on a regular basis.

[edit on 10-1-2009 by pinch]


proj⋅ect(v). to throw, cast, or impel forward or onward.
pro⋅pel(v). to drive, or cause to move, forward or onward

How many people does it take to throw a 90 ton airliner at a building?

Planes are not "projected" they are propelled. When you try assuming command of the english language, make sure you understand ALL the definitions in your statement please.



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 04:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by cluckerspud
I am not going to include a picture of a missile and a picture of a plane,
that would be too juvenile.


C'mon, please do. This thread is getting me so confused I can't tell the difference between them anymore.



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 04:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by paxnatus
I don't have to. I know what I believe!! I believe many Americans and foreigners died that day! I believe that all the speculating in the world won't
bring those people back!


What is it with this 'Americans and foreigners' division? Isn't it enough to say that many people died that day?



posted on Jan, 16 2009 @ 09:40 PM
link   
Reminder:

Thread Title:

"9/11 Commissioner slips up, says missile hit Pentagon"

Please Stay On Topic

Semper



new topics

top topics



 
50
<< 9  10  11    13 >>

log in

join