It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
[edit] Military interest
According to Hutchison and United States Col. John Alexander,[6] military scientists from the United States have been working with him because of the effect's military potential. In the documentary Free Energy: The Race to Zero Point, he states that military scientists were impressed with the effects, but were not able to replicate them on their own without assistance.[7][8][9]
Hutchison later accused the military of coercing the Canadian government into seizing his lab so that it could be passed on to Lockheed Martin Skunk Works for research purposes. Journalist and author Nick Cook later wrote that this had been confirmed by a high-ranking friend of his in the Skunk Works.[10] Boyd Bushman, retired Lockheed Martin senior engineer, later confirmed this in an interview in Nick Cook's book The Hunt for Zero Point.[11]
Hutchison claims that "at the end of the cold war" a "military intelligence service" (not otherwise specified) destroyed his lab in Vancouver while he was traveling in Europe. To support this allegation, Hutchison has presented photos of letters allegedly written by various scientific and government organizations, as well as a letter allegedly written by Hans-Adam II, Prince of Liechtenstein. However, it is far from clear what relevance these letters, whose provenance is unverified, might have.
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
Now I don't think that United States Colonel would lie. But of course, everyone on the Disclosure Project is quacked out to, right Into the pit we go?
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
So in theory, this could transpire throughout many modifications into possible anti-gravity (considering you have a very powerful energy source)?
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
reply to post by Intothepitwego
Well obviouslly my statement would be nothing of what I'm going to present regarding deragotory terms but,
As I said before in this thread if not another... You are the type to discredit everyone of the The Disclosure Project's people.
Originally posted by theresult
reply to post by Revolution-2012
Rev we are both wasting our time..
hes does not want to belive in it so we cant change his mind...
its all fake and there is no zero point.
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
reply to post by Intothepitwego
Apparently a certain Colonel of the military believes so, and I think me and you both know how elusive they are.
I won't lie, when it comes to things out of the ordinary I tend to believe in the possiblity they might be true when supplemented with evidence, you know, like the Phoenix Lights however that is a much more definitive and hard to deny event than John Hutchinson. I'm not excluding the fact that he may be a fraud, I just believe for the sake of my own imagination and escoteric lifestyle that he may not be a fraud.
=\
Does that answer your question?
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
reply to post by Intothepitwego
One.
Rumsfield is just as elusive as the Colonel.
Two.
Regardless if he is a scientist, has beein in a interview, does not matter fact is he made statements suggesting Hutchinson's claims to be correct.
Three.
Is there any scientist that has gave you proof of UFOs?
Originally posted by Intothepitwego
Not one of those was an answer but thanks for numbering them anyway.
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
Originally posted by Intothepitwego
Not one of those was an answer but thanks for numbering them anyway.
And you have answered my questions. You have displayed yourself ignorant yet once in the aspect that even though people with substantial evidence of existance of anything out of the ordinary still do not supplement physical proof.
For anything to mean anything to you it'd have to slap you in your face.
Point being, it doesn't matter if that Colonel was telling the truth, because he's just as likely to be lieing. And the truth is, you're right, but atleast take a gance through my eyes and see that there is a possibility for the extra-ordinary. And there is buddy.
Originally posted by Revolution-2012
reply to post by Intothepitwego
I'm sorry, but I honestly could care less if you think I'm stupid. You have no proof that he didn't produce the effects naturually, outside of the UFO incident which might I add AGAIN it was not on a STRING it was on a WIRE with ELECTRICITY DC running to it.
So.
Respectfully, I value your analytical viewpoints however you do not present any proof that factually states he is a fraud. However you do show proof that he may be.