It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jonna
But we already have guns!?!
I am all for the advancement of science and such, but perhaps the civilization of humans should not survive. Sure we have advanced ourselves, but only in a way which we can kill on a much larger scale for no essensial reason and claim that it is for a just cause.
Originally posted by godservant
Religion is not way for the weak to control the strong, but the opposite. Those that you view as strong are really weak because they are giving in to their selfish agendas. Then, to believe in something with no proof is not a matter weakness, but strength to open up your mind and soul. For those of us that 'genuinly' seek God find proof in healing, peace and love.
Without God, this world would be so much worse than it is now because the weak leaders would be feeding their shelfish needs at your expence - more than they do now.
I think one of the reasons why we are alive in this day and age is to incorporate both good and evil, and be nondual. Just IMO.
Where else in nature does the pack give a (c) about the weaker members?
The ONLY reason we are alive is to eat and reproduce all the rest is extra.
Originally posted by Amuk
Is trying to be spiritual a waste of time?
Should we not embrace our animalistic natures?
Religion goes against everything in our nature and therefore is not only useless but counterproductive.
I believe it was started as a scam for the weaker members of the tribe to get an edge till then everything depended on raw power.
So which would be better living as nature intended or fighting our selves to become something that we not only are not but will never be?
[Edited on 9-4-2004 by Amuk]
Or the "compassionate" ones who would help each other and even help those who are weaker than themselves.
First I want to point out the fact that spirituality and religion are not the same thing. A person can be spiritual, which is a part of our nature, without being religious. Organized religion, however, doesn't originate from human nature.
The weak are those people that choice to go against evolution and revert backwards toward the instincts of the beast.
Or should you put your favorite superstition ahead of them? Remember in the bible it says to put god BEFORE ytour family, and Abraham was even willing to kill his son to get on gods good side.
In all the years of humanity there is not ONE shred of proof that we are "rewarded" or "punished" for ANYTHING we do in this life in the afterworld.
Wouldnt things be a lot better if we consentrated on THIS world instead of never-never land?
And by the way I AM a martial artist.
Originally posted by Amuk
Is trying to be spiritual a waste of time?
If I were to embrace my animalistic nature I would have probably hurt a lot of people by now. I realize another human being or any other sentient being for that matter has a right to exist here as much as I do. I think that the only way I should embrace my animalistic nature is to defend myself from a threat. And if I should have to eliminate a life that is a threat, I will honour that life's spirit by praying to the Creator because everything comes from the same source.
Should we not embrace our animalistic natures?
True, science classifies the human as animal. That doesn't mean I act like one, though.
We are animals.
What does this have to do with religion?
I think that balance and harmony are the center of life and the centre of one's own life as well.
Violiance not only is a part of life it is the CENTER of life.
I think living as nature intended. Nature nurtures us. It is the love of a mother for her child where nature manifests. It is in our nature to protect ourselves from a threat, to care for others, and to develop ourselves beyond our current situation, physically and spiritually.
So which would be better living as nature intended or fighting our selves to become something that we not only are not but will never be?