Gene wars, page 1

Gene wars, page

privacy

Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times

Topic started on 9-1-2009 @ 04:35 PM by Acharya

Wars like the current at the Gaza strip is about gene supremacy, and not politics. The primitive human subconscious mind suppresses this true motive and makes a false representation of reality to the conscious mind, a false reality may be presented as politics or a conflict over resources. Man is a primitive, and the war in Gaza is no more different then other conflicts in past history where one gene strand tries to exterminate another. In the natural world this fight of the genes usually is beneficial in the long run as the strongest genes survives. Nature is beautiful, but cruel.

reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 04:48 PM by redled

I suspect you'll find it more territorial bunker mentality. I remember a very tragic but beautiful story of a Jew (from Scotland) being killed in the violence. He had an organ donor card and his parents (also Jewish) made sure that some of his organs went to Israelis, but others to Paklestinians. It's sad that in that area they cannot see so clearly, but this is not some kind of Uber war, it is about precious resources, tribes and loyalties and outsiders can see this and want to bridge the two. Genetics has nothing to do with this unless you follow Hitler's philosophy.

reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 05:39 PM by Acharya

Resources are needed by the genes, in the case of food resources the ones that can eat more can reproduce more.

reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 05:46 PM by redled

Originally posted by Acharya
Resources are needed by the genes, in the case of food resources the ones that can eat more can reproduce more.

That's really clever. Suppose your 'blonde hair gene' is that fighting your 'brunette gene?' Not really, it is phenotypes that fight. Genetics is about a random (albeit liklehood in passing on said gene), it is not about 'my genes are different to yours so we must fight.' Dogs are different genes to any of us yet we welcome them into our families. The selfish gene does not think, it reproduces or it does not. There is not one Uber gene that we fight over, we form opinions of people or dogs or cats or goldfish as we do. Resources are needed by phenotypes and anything else is fascist.

reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 06:18 PM by Acharya

reply to post by redled

Smaller changes in genes are more accepted than larger ones, when there is a great diversity within a gene pool, like with hair color, the genes tend to be more accepting. In small human tribes or villages a blond haired person would have troubles finding a mate if all the other tribe members had black hair.

A wild animal would most likely not welcome you, becuase it does not know humans give food and shelter. A tamed animal would know this, and with food and shelter it is more likely to prosper, which again promises good for its possibilities of reproducing its genes.

Comparing purposed opinions with a socially unaccepted ideology is not productive to a objective discussion.

[edit on 9-1-2009 by Acharya]

reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 06:27 PM by redled

Originally posted by Acharya
reply to post by redled

Smaller changes in genes are more accepted by the other genes than larger ones, genes prefer that genes are closer to them, when there is a great diversity within a gene pool, like with hair color, the genes tend to be more accepting.

So what is this 'Palestinian Gene?'

A wild animal would most likely not welcome you, becuase it does not know humans give food and shelter. A tamed animal would know this, and with food and shelter it is more likely to prosper, which again promises good for its possibilities of reproducing its genes.

So how did it get tamed?

Comparing purposed opinions with a socially unaccepted ideology is not productive to a objective discussion.

It's all subjective, and you 'objectivise' ideology which is the first step towards either communism or fascism, I don't know your bent.

Phenotype speaks, idiots like you try.

reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 06:30 PM by Acharya

This discussion is obviously emotionally upsetting to you, I wish you good luck, sir.

reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 06:47 PM by redled