Originally posted by Alphard
I guess it is a choice to some degree - Ukraine can choose cheap gas and be in Russia's direct area of influence.. or attempt to be in Europe and
settle for higher gas prices.
The problem is it chose to stray away from Russia and towards NATO, yet it refuses to accept the increase in gas prices. Somehow it feels entitled to
continue buying gas at heavily subsidised old prices.
The problem for Ukraine is that much of their key industry is heavily reliant on cheap gas. More expensive gas could cause these industries to
crumble, or would require them to undergo substantial modernization to become more efficient.
Originally posted by Alphard
Now if Europe does want Ukraine in the gang and a weaker Russia, I can completely see them picking up the bill not only now but also in the future -
say some sort of financial aid with weak oversight that can be channeled to Ukraine's energy market.
The thing is no one has any problems with Ukraine joining EU - not even Russia. So Europeans aren't ganging up on Russia by accepting Ukraine into
EU. The problem arises with Ukraine's Yuschenko wanting to join NATO. Europeans don't really care much for Ukraine joining NATO - so why should
they help it economically?
Only U.S. really wants Ukraine in NATO - and one could say that current dispute has much to do with U.S. and its puppet Yuschenko. So it is not
Europe that should pay Ukraine's bill, but U.S. We shall wait and see how intent Obama is on nurturing the puppet that is Ukraine. I think U.S. has
far more pressing issues at this time that worrying about Yuschenko - who is on his way out anyway.