There is a difference between a new world order and THE NEW WORLD ORDER as we understand the NWO to be. But it may be a way of soft pedaling it also.
Understating the obvious? The good thing is that if this globalization thing is to work for them then they will not let all there $ go to
zero.....there will be an exchange of currencies for the new world one.
Kissinger writes: 2009 will mark beginning of NWO, page 1
privacy
Topic started on 8-1-2009 @ 08:26 PM by Warrior of Light
Henry Kissinger has told the elites of banking, business and politics that if the right steps are made, the new world order will begin in 2009.
Kissinger wrote a very revealing essay for the The World In 2009 issue of The Economist magazine regarding the new world order, and how its supporters plan to move forward.
Here's the article: An End of Hubris
(If the link doesn't work for you, the article can be found easily by Googling "Kissinger", "New World Order", "Economist", and is on the Economist's website).
Unlike the recent comments made by Kissinger on CNBC ( CNBC - Kissinger: Obama to use crisis to create new world order ), the Economist article details and explains how a new world order would work, and what changes the elite would have to make. The language used by Kissinger is often difficult to understand, as the essay is aimed at the insiders and highly-educated individuals who subscribe to the magazine. I'm sure there are far fewer people who are aware of Kissinger's Economist essay, compared to the CNBC comments, as the magazine is written and read by people inside of the business/banking/political spheres.
However, it is definitely worth a read, simply because of the important statements Kissinger is making, and what he sees as coming events in 2009.
The statement by Kissinger at the end of the article will probably raise some eyebrows, and questions:
If progress is made on these enterprises, 2009 will mark the beginning of a new world order.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
If the PTB want to make the kind of "progress" Kissinger is alluding to, I have no reason to believe they won't MAKE it happen by any means necessary. Remember what George H.W. Bush said in regard to the new world order:
"When we are successful, and we will be, we'll have a real chance at this new world order." - Link
The Economist is a highly respected magazine amongst elite insiders in both business and politics. The magazine has been publishing many articles and essays which generally promote the idea of globalization for as long as I've been reading it. Most political science professors in the Western world recommend the magazine as a source of important and upcoming issues.
The particular magazine in which Kissinger's essay can be found was sold in November / December of 2008. This edition was aimed at forecasting and discussing the events, people, places, and issues which will shape 2009. Kissinger's article was prominent, as the cover and index both had the words "New World Order" in obvious places, directing readers to Kissinger's article.
Here's a link to a thread which is discussing the comments made by Kissinger on CNBC:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 1/9/2009 by Warrior of Light]
Kissinger wrote a very revealing essay for the The World In 2009 issue of The Economist magazine regarding the new world order, and how its supporters plan to move forward.
Here's the article: An End of Hubris
(If the link doesn't work for you, the article can be found easily by Googling "Kissinger", "New World Order", "Economist", and is on the Economist's website).
Unlike the recent comments made by Kissinger on CNBC ( CNBC - Kissinger: Obama to use crisis to create new world order ), the Economist article details and explains how a new world order would work, and what changes the elite would have to make. The language used by Kissinger is often difficult to understand, as the essay is aimed at the insiders and highly-educated individuals who subscribe to the magazine. I'm sure there are far fewer people who are aware of Kissinger's Economist essay, compared to the CNBC comments, as the magazine is written and read by people inside of the business/banking/political spheres.
However, it is definitely worth a read, simply because of the important statements Kissinger is making, and what he sees as coming events in 2009.
The statement by Kissinger at the end of the article will probably raise some eyebrows, and questions:
If progress is made on these enterprises, 2009 will mark the beginning of a new world order.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
If the PTB want to make the kind of "progress" Kissinger is alluding to, I have no reason to believe they won't MAKE it happen by any means necessary. Remember what George H.W. Bush said in regard to the new world order:
"When we are successful, and we will be, we'll have a real chance at this new world order." - Link
The Economist is a highly respected magazine amongst elite insiders in both business and politics. The magazine has been publishing many articles and essays which generally promote the idea of globalization for as long as I've been reading it. Most political science professors in the Western world recommend the magazine as a source of important and upcoming issues.
The particular magazine in which Kissinger's essay can be found was sold in November / December of 2008. This edition was aimed at forecasting and discussing the events, people, places, and issues which will shape 2009. Kissinger's article was prominent, as the cover and index both had the words "New World Order" in obvious places, directing readers to Kissinger's article.
Here's a link to a thread which is discussing the comments made by Kissinger on CNBC:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
[edit on 1/9/2009 by Warrior of Light]
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 08:38 PM by MrJelly
reply to post by Warrior of Light
nothing wrong with the NWO.
you all, the masses, love the NWO. you all BEGGED FOR IT.
thats why it is here and will be even more powerful.
you all willingly gave consent to create the NWO and maintain it and give it more power. You willingly gave power to it. You willingly handed them their power.
simple.
stop playing the blame game. take responsibility.
nothing wrong with the NWO.
you all, the masses, love the NWO. you all BEGGED FOR IT.
thats why it is here and will be even more powerful.
you all willingly gave consent to create the NWO and maintain it and give it more power. You willingly gave power to it. You willingly handed them their power.
simple.
stop playing the blame game. take responsibility.
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 08:46 PM by Skittle
reply to post by MrJelly
The New World Order as Kissinger knows it involves depopulation and genocide of the habitants that resides in "the third world". Are you mad?
The New World Order as Kissinger knows it involves depopulation and genocide of the habitants that resides in "the third world". Are you mad?
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 08:51 PM by Warrior of Light
Among the plans and details of this new world order article, I did find some interesting statements. According to Kissinger, the new world order will
require global partnerships which have never been seen before. Kissinger makes a case for American dominance/hegemony to willingly take a back-seat in
favor of these partnerships.
While I agree, the world should work for equality, one has to understand that people like Kissinger are not concerned with the average person. They are concerned with keeping power over the lives of all citizens. Some fear that a new world order could lead to a one world government, and this is certainly cause for concern. This would happen gradually, and not in an obvious way, and the result would be greater control over the populations of the world. We don't live in a Utopia, and the politicians and corporations of this world would not rule in a way which would help the average person. They seek control over EVERY person on the Earth.
He cites the economic crisis as one area in which America will need to allow more control from other countries. As he says:
"Now that the clay feet of the economic system have been exposed, the gap between a global system for economics and the global political system based on the state must be addressed as a dominant task in 2009. The economy must be put on a sound footing..."
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
Article - An End of Hubris
Of course, Kissinger speaks about some of the potential benefits to reorganizing the global economy, such as equality and fairness. He believes the developing nations will seek a larger role in global politics and economics in 2009:
"Any economic system, but especially a market economy, produces winners and losers. If the gap between them becomes too great, the losers will organise themselves politically and seek to recast the existing system—within nations and between them. This will be a major theme of 2009.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
I realize that many people see the new world order as a catchphrase, or general term, meaning "a changing of the guard." Some people see the new world order as nothing more than the mere reshuffling of power from those countries which have dominated through imperialism, to countries which are emerging powers (like China and India). This may be correct, but is an optimistic outlook, IMO. I am aware of the global shifts, and how the world will evolve to allow for more globalization. I DO see some benefits in this, mainly for developing nations. I disagree with the imperialistic perspective forced onto other nations. This is why I can only see the new world order as negative. The IMF, WTO, and World Bank have used the notion of globalization to take wealth from the developing nations, and give it to the bankers and corporations of the Western nations. How can the NWO be any different, when it's the same leaders who are supporting the NWO?
All opinions are welcome, as I am not trying to tell you how a new world order will play out (if it'll be good or bad). I have my opinions, and everyone sees things differently. The purpose of this thread is to show you that one of the most influential men in the global political sphere is talking about the possibility of the NWO in 2009.
[edit on 1/9/2009 by Warrior of Light]
While I agree, the world should work for equality, one has to understand that people like Kissinger are not concerned with the average person. They are concerned with keeping power over the lives of all citizens. Some fear that a new world order could lead to a one world government, and this is certainly cause for concern. This would happen gradually, and not in an obvious way, and the result would be greater control over the populations of the world. We don't live in a Utopia, and the politicians and corporations of this world would not rule in a way which would help the average person. They seek control over EVERY person on the Earth.
He cites the economic crisis as one area in which America will need to allow more control from other countries. As he says:
"Now that the clay feet of the economic system have been exposed, the gap between a global system for economics and the global political system based on the state must be addressed as a dominant task in 2009. The economy must be put on a sound footing..."
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
Article - An End of Hubris
Of course, Kissinger speaks about some of the potential benefits to reorganizing the global economy, such as equality and fairness. He believes the developing nations will seek a larger role in global politics and economics in 2009:
"Any economic system, but especially a market economy, produces winners and losers. If the gap between them becomes too great, the losers will organise themselves politically and seek to recast the existing system—within nations and between them. This will be a major theme of 2009.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
I realize that many people see the new world order as a catchphrase, or general term, meaning "a changing of the guard." Some people see the new world order as nothing more than the mere reshuffling of power from those countries which have dominated through imperialism, to countries which are emerging powers (like China and India). This may be correct, but is an optimistic outlook, IMO. I am aware of the global shifts, and how the world will evolve to allow for more globalization. I DO see some benefits in this, mainly for developing nations. I disagree with the imperialistic perspective forced onto other nations. This is why I can only see the new world order as negative. The IMF, WTO, and World Bank have used the notion of globalization to take wealth from the developing nations, and give it to the bankers and corporations of the Western nations. How can the NWO be any different, when it's the same leaders who are supporting the NWO?
All opinions are welcome, as I am not trying to tell you how a new world order will play out (if it'll be good or bad). I have my opinions, and everyone sees things differently. The purpose of this thread is to show you that one of the most influential men in the global political sphere is talking about the possibility of the NWO in 2009.
[edit on 1/9/2009 by Warrior of Light]
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 08:59 PM by new world disorder
reply to post by Warrior of Light
i wouldnt expect the nwo to come so soon but i have no doubts anything can happen.. when the nwo come in play so will the new world disorder. i dont know if others on the forum plan to riot but that what the nwd is
i wouldnt expect the nwo to come so soon but i have no doubts anything can happen.. when the nwo come in play so will the new world disorder. i dont know if others on the forum plan to riot but that what the nwd is
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 09:05 PM by Warrior of Light
Originally posted by MrJelly
reply to post by Warrior of Light
nothing wrong with the NWO.
you all, the masses, love the NWO. you all BEGGED FOR IT.
thats why it is here and will be even more powerful.
you all willingly gave consent to create the NWO and maintain it and give it more power. You willingly gave power to it. You willingly handed them their power.
simple.
stop playing the blame game. take responsibility.
I hate the NWO, and will fight it to the death! If I begged, it was in a time of weakness, before I awoke. I WILL NOT BEG AGAIN!
Should a newborn baby be able to reason what is lies and truth in the world? Or does the baby listen to the parents for advice and understanding? And maybe one day, the person is fortunate enough to see lies for what they are, and seek the truth!
People are waking up to the NWO, and many of us REFUSE to be rolled over. We won't go silently.
You're right, we gave it power, as humanity. Now it's time to take it away!
IT'S NOT TOO LATE!
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 09:20 PM by Warrior of Light
Originally posted by new world disorder
reply to post by Warrior of Light
i wouldnt expect the nwo to come so soon but i have no doubts anything can happen.. when the nwo come in play so will the new world disorder. i dont know if others on the forum plan to riot but that what the nwd is
You can riot if you want to. I won't tell you what's right or wrong.
Just know that this is what they expect you to do.
I'll be at home protecting my friends and family.
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 09:37 PM by new world disorder
Originally posted by Warrior of Light
reply to post by Warrior of Light
You can riot if you want to. I won't tell you what's right or wrong.
Just know that this is what they expect you to do.
I'll be at home protecting my friends and family.
good point i may reconsider
[edit on 8-1-2009 by new world disorder]
[edit on 8-1-2009 by new world disorder]
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:07 PM by stikkinikki
Originally posted by new world disorder
reply to post by Warrior of Light
i wouldnt expect the nwo to come so soon but i have no doubts anything can happen.. when the nwo come in play so will the new world disorder. i dont know if others on the forum plan to riot but that what the nwd is
It's bad enough I can not really keep up with my bills but now are you gonna burn my house down? What will a riot accomplish?
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:28 PM by FewWorldOrder
From OP's link
www.economist.com...
I'm not sensing Mr. Kissingers' sincerity or confidence in the above statement.
Indeed Mr. Kissinger, I would love for you to detail your thoughts on these matters.
[edit on 8-1-2009 by FewWorldOrder]
www.economist.com...
Hopefully, in the process, past lessons of excessive state control will not be forgotten.
I'm not sensing Mr. Kissingers' sincerity or confidence in the above statement.
As America narrows its horizons, what is a plausible security system and aimed at what threats? What is the future of capitalism? How, in such circumstances, does the world deal with global challenges, such as nuclear proliferation or climate change?
Indeed Mr. Kissinger, I would love for you to detail your thoughts on these matters.
[edit on 8-1-2009 by FewWorldOrder]
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:35 PM by Warrior of Light
reply to post by FewWorldOrder
THIS is the kind of reply I was hoping for.
You saw a couple of important points I had noticed, but didn't comment on myself. He's really revealing some things, but leaves a lot up to critical thinking and precedent.
If you understand the NWO, and how the NWO members want the world to look like, and you see how they've handled things in the past, and you STILL trust them... well, that's just stupid in my opinion.
I'd rather listen to what they have to say, so I can AVOID following their plans.
THIS is the kind of reply I was hoping for.
You saw a couple of important points I had noticed, but didn't comment on myself. He's really revealing some things, but leaves a lot up to critical thinking and precedent.
If you understand the NWO, and how the NWO members want the world to look like, and you see how they've handled things in the past, and you STILL trust them... well, that's just stupid in my opinion.
I'd rather listen to what they have to say, so I can AVOID following their plans.
A Long Time In The Making and Here\'s The Proof - Thine Eyes and Ears Do not Deceive Thee!!!!
Posted 13 days ago with 19 member flags
Posted 13 days ago with 19 member flags
MSM Try To Debunk Illuminati Denver Airport Underground Facility
Posted 18 days ago with 10 member flags
Posted 18 days ago with 10 member flags
Behind the Swoosh: Your clothes come from this type of sweatshop hell
Posted 14 days ago with 9 member flags
Posted 14 days ago with 9 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Second most devastating oil spill? Massive oil spill in Venezuela
Fragile Earth, Posted 47 minutes ago
Fragile Earth, Posted 47 minutes ago
Iran To Reveal Nuclear Progress - "Big New" Achievements
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 50 minutes ago
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 50 minutes ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Google accidentally released Maine election results early!
2012 US Elections, Posted 12 hours ago, 63 flags
2012 US Elections, Posted 12 hours ago, 63 flags
Threatened by a Ron Paul victory in Maine, GOP (insider spills beans) adds last minute caucuses.
2012 US Elections, Posted 17 hours ago, 40 flags
2012 US Elections, Posted 17 hours ago, 40 flags
Greek police union wants to arrest EU/IMF officials
Breaking Political News, Posted 17 hours ago, 19 flags
Breaking Political News, Posted 17 hours ago, 19 flags
Russia : We will take DRASTIC measures if the west doesn't stop their BS with Syria
World War Three, Posted 16 hours ago, 16 flags
World War Three, Posted 16 hours ago, 16 flags
The CIA in Australia: America's Foreign Watergate
Political Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 15 flags
Political Conspiracies, Posted 11 hours ago, 15 flags
Iran to announce "very important" nuclear achievements
Middle East Issues, Posted 6 hours ago, 13 flags
Middle East Issues, Posted 6 hours ago, 13 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Google accidentally released Maine election results early!
2012 US Elections, Posted 12 hours ago, 80 replies
2012 US Elections, Posted 12 hours ago, 80 replies
Massive Obama Conspiracy to Kill the Second Amendment
US Political Madness, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies
US Political Madness, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies
Actor Nicolas Cage finally comes out to talk about his doppelgänger in a civil war era photo.
General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 62 replies
General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 62 replies
Russia : We will take DRASTIC measures if the west doesn't stop their BS with Syria
World War Three, Posted 16 hours ago, 52 replies
World War Three, Posted 16 hours ago, 52 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.213 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.213 seconds
