It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The U.N. Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which feeds half of Gaza's 1.5 million people,
Hamas officials said the Palestinian toll in Israel's 13 day-old offensive rose to 765 dead.
The Hamas ministry of health said 34 percent of the dead and 35 percent of over 3,000 injured were children.
Gaza medics describe horror of strike which killed 70
Growing evidence emerged today of the bloodiest single incident of the Gaza conflict when around 70 corpses were found by a Palestinian paramedic near a bombed-out house.
Mohammed Shaheen, a volunteer with Palestinian Red Crescent, was in the first convoy of ambulances to reach the site of the blast in Zeitoun since it was first occupied then shelled by the Israeli army.
His testimony confirmed accounts, first reported in The Telegraph, from survivors of the extended al Samouni clan who said they feared between 60 and 70 family members had been killed.
"Inside the Samouni house I saw about ten bodies and outside another sixty,'' Mr Shaheen said.
"I was not able to count them accurately because there was not much time and we were looking for wounded people.
"We found fifteen people still alive but injured so we took them in the ambulances.
"I could see an Israeli army bulldozer knocking down houses nearby but we ran out of time and the Israeli soldiers started shooting at us.
www.telegraph.co.uk...
The Death count is unknown because a survey has not been conducted yet. That is why people call it a slaughter
How is that 'careful' or 'compassionate?'
Originally posted by jam321
1,495,000 out of 1,5 million are still not on the dead or injured count. I would say that is being careful. Look, I am not celebrating or proud that those Palestinians are injured or dead. I am just trying to show that if Israel really wanted to slaughter or kill Palestinians at free will, the casualties would be a lot higher.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by Cadbury
How is that 'careful' or 'compassionate?'
1,495,000 out of 1,5 million are still not on the dead or injured count. I would say that is being careful. Look, I am not celebrating or proud that those Palestinians are injured or dead. I am just trying to show that if Israel really wanted to slaughter or kill Palestinians at free will, the casualties would be a lot higher.
sorry for the rant, but I am sick and tired of seeing any child killed because adults have less common sense than a child.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by Cadbury
How is that 'careful' or 'compassionate?'
1,495,000 out of 1,5 million are still not on the dead or injured count. I would say that is being careful.
Look, I am not celebrating or proud that those Palestinians are injured or dead.
I am just trying to show that if Israel really wanted to slaughter or kill Palestinians at free will, the casualties would be a lot higher.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by drwizardphd
This thread is just to show and prove that Israel is being cautious as can be.
Originally posted by jam321
Could there have been mistakes made that injured or cost a person their life? Most certainly, it is a war.
They may not be slaughtering or killing them at free will, but they're still slaughtering and killing them.
Originally posted by jam321
Vould you please explain how Israel is slaughtering them?
I disagree. If Israel was being cautious, it would enter peace talks instead of recklessly invading.
It is a disproportionate response to a small terrorist operation.
However, what they are doing is slowly subduing the Islamic population by killing just enough to keep their "war" sellable to the gullible west.