UFO claim over wind farm damage, page 1

This topic is in the Breaking Alternative News discussion forum. (rss)

UFO claim over wind farm damage

Topic started on 8-1-2009 @ 04:27 PM by cogburn
UFO claim over wind farm damage news.bbc.co.uk UFO enthusiasts are claiming damage to a Lincolnshire wind farm turbine was caused by a mystery aircraft. The turbine at Conisholme lost one 66ft (20m) blade and another was badly damaged in the early hours of Sunday. County councillor for the area Robert Palmer said he had seen a "round, white light that seemed to be hovering". Ecotricity, which owns the site, said while investigations continued they were not ruling anything out - but the extent of damage was "unique". The turbine is one of 20 at the Conisholme site, which has been only been fully operational since April 2008. The broken blade has been recovered and is being examined. Local ufologists said they had received many reports of activity in the area and had teams searching for clues. (visit the link for the full news article)
copyright & usage
Click here for more Breaking Alternative News topics Hot Topics \| Top Topics \| This Week \| Subscribe \| Home
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:27 PM by cogburn
This story originated on the BBC, but has been picked up by CNN and other services. For those folks who continue to assert that there are some revelations coming, the speed at which this story has been picked up and circulated by the MSM lends a little credence to your claims. This is only the latest example of MSM coverage of UFO events in a manner that is unprecedented prior to this century. Stevenville and the Chicago airport sightings are the other examples that come to mind and I don't consider myself someone very well versed in UFOlogy. I have to say, maybe you're right. This doesn't mean that I say that I think UFO's are little green men, however it does seem that the pace and quality of UFO coverage by the MSM is definitely increasing. news.bbc.co.uk (visit the link for the full news article) EDIT: There's video on that link, BTW. [edit on 8-1-2009 by cogburn]
copyright & usage

reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:29 PM by TwiTcHomatic
Already being discussed here... www.abovetopsecret.com... Just a little late
copyright & usage

reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:29 PM by blupblup
reply to post by cogburn Use the search feature.... there are already a fair amount of threads on this. not a one liner
copyright & usage
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:30 PM by blupblup
reply to post by TwiTcHomatic snap!! lol
copyright & usage

reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:30 PM by MemoryShock
It is ATS policy to allow two threads on the same topic if one of them resides in the Breaking Alternative News section. Carry on...
copyright & usage

reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:32 PM by blupblup
reply to post by MemoryShock there is already two threads... one in each.
copyright & usage

reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:32 PM by cogburn
removed by me, Mods ruled on it already [edit on 8-1-2009 by cogburn]
copyright & usage

reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:32 PM by TwiTcHomatic
reply to post by MemoryShock I know its the policy as well.... Just redundant to have information fragmented over several threads. Just my opinion (not that it matters).
copyright & usage

reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:34 PM by orgyofthedead
Yeah shorely that just silly seen as theres 12 pages of it already in the other thread? Whats the point? [edit on 8-1-2009 by orgyofthedead]
copyright & usage
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:35 PM by blupblup
www.abovetopsecret.com... www.abovetopsecret.com... www.abovetopsecret.com... www.abovetopsecret.com... www.abovetopsecret.com... www.abovetopsecret.com... is that enough??
copyright & usage

reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 04:35 PM by MemoryShock
On second look...there are many threads in BAN on this topic that have already been closed. Please contribute any further questions and/or comments to this thread. Thank you. Thread Closed.
copyright & usage