Has a sovereign Palestine ever existed?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 09:55 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by johnny2127



No. The Name Palistine was derived from Philistine which were staunch enemies of the Jews in ancient history. When the Romans invaded and destroyed Jerusalem and sent most of the Jews (not all) into captivity, the Romans set out to obliderate all vistages of a Jewsih nation, going so far as to renaming the land of the Jews to Philistine.

Today, the refugees in the West Bank and in Gaza are of Syrian, Egyptian and Jordanian origin. The modern term Palistinian was coined by the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem after the 6 day war. Incidently the Grand Mufti was the uncle of Yassir Arafat, the head of terrorist organization,f the PLO. (incidently, the Grand Mufti was a close associate and Ally of the Third Reich's Adolf Hitler.)

No such thing as a Palistinian. These are as I have said, refugees from Jordan ( who incidently slaughtered 50,000 of these Heshemites for stage a failed coup d'stat against the King of Jordan). They are Egyptians and Syrian. Do the research.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:05 AM by johnny2127
reply to post by Rook1545



Good analogy. My question is, what rights do the Palestinians actually have? I am not asking that in a rhetorical sense, but in earnest. Some argue that Israel stole all their land from Palestine. While others argue it wasn't Palestinian land but that of Syria and Jordan, and what they have was given to them or they won.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:17 AM by Rook1545
reply to post by johnny2127



Some of it was won, some of it was stolen in land grabs in the name of "settlement". I have found a map of what Israel was in the beginning and what they have taken through various means since then:



I am not giving any kind of editorial as to whether or not it was justified, just pointing out the changes.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:22 AM by grover
What a silly question.

Palestine is the Latin name of of the region and except for a few brief periods of self rule has been a province of one empire or another for its entire history.

People have come and gone through the region for thousands of years just like they have almost every other place on earth... The Jews and the Arabs are just two many.

None of that however changes the fact that the area exists and that people lived there prior to the 47 war who called it home and in some cases called it home for hundreds if not thousands of years.

At the risk of sounding extreme what happened to the Palestinians in the years leading up to 47 and after wards is not so much different as to what happened to the American Indian with the advent of the Europeans... i.e. a long established people was forced off of their land to make room for another.

The Arabs there (who BTW are Muslim, Christian and Jewish as opposed to all Muslim which the media seems to suggest) were long standing stewards of the land and as such have a right and a valid claim to be there and sooner or later Israel has got to get off its high horse and accept that fact or there will never be peace there.

Really the only solution that will work is the one no one wants to talk about and that is the formation of a joint Israeli/Palestinian state with full rights for all of the people there and to work out some sort of fair compenstation.... this will happen before this century is out if only because of demographics but the sooner both sides recognize this and start a legitimate and valid dialogue to achieve the less blood will be spilled.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:28 AM by johnny2127
reply to post by grover



Yes it is an overly simplistic question and for that I apologize. But I think you get the gist of the conversation is was meant to foster. The level of misunderstanding is shocking and most people don't know the facts.

However, even with the facts laid out, it doesn't answer the main question of what is right and moral.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:29 AM by ANNED
No before it was Israel it was the British Mandate of Palestine, before that it was part of the ottoman empire.

en.wikipedia.org...

The Palestinians could also claim Jordan and Syria they also have historical rights to claim them.



reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:59 AM by johnny2127
reply to post by grover



So would you say the actions of organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah are moral or immoral?


reply posted on 10-1-2009 @ 09:39 AM by grover
reply to post by Gazrok



Therefore make Jeursalem a trans-national locale, an international city as it were with joint control.

Mind you I am not... I stress... I am not anti-Israeli... I am just not deluded into thinking that they can do no wrong or are always the guys in the white hats.

[edit on 10-1-2009 by grover]


reply posted on 10-1-2009 @ 09:55 AM by resistor
Originally posted by grover
reply to
post by Gazrok



Therefore make Jerusalem a trans-national locale, an international city as it were with joint control.

Mind you I am not... I stress... I am not anti-Israeli... I am just not deluded into thinking that they can do no wrong or are always the guys in the white hats.

[edit on 10-1-2009 by grover]


This is exactly the solution that many believe The Bible foretells, including a divided temple mount with a third temple across from the mosque and the dome of the rock.



reply posted on 13-1-2009 @ 08:54 AM by SectionEight
Originally posted by grover
What a silly question.

Palestine is the Latin name of of the region and except for a few brief periods of self rule has been a province of one empire or another for its entire history.

People have come and gone through the region for thousands of years just like they have almost every other place on earth... The Jews and the Arabs are just two many.

None of that however changes the fact that the area exists and that people lived there prior to the 47 war who called it home and in some cases called it home for hundreds if not thousands of years.

At the risk of sounding extreme what happened to the Palestinians in the years leading up to 47 and after wards is not so much different as to what happened to the American Indian with the advent of the Europeans... i.e. a long established people was forced off of their land to make room for another.

The Arabs there (who BTW are Muslim, Christian and Jewish as opposed to all Muslim which the media seems to suggest) were long standing stewards of the land and as such have a right and a valid claim to be there and sooner or later Israel has got to get off its high horse and accept that fact or there will never be peace there.

Really the only solution that will work is the one no one wants to talk about and that is the formation of a joint Israeli/Palestinian state with full rights for all of the people there and to work out some sort of fair compenstation.... this will happen before this century is out if only because of demographics but the sooner both sides recognize this and start a legitimate and valid dialogue to achieve the less blood will be spilled.


You are quite wrong on all accounts.
The Arab people who lived there were refered to as palestinians. The Jews lived among them and they were generally at peace prior to the early 20th century. The place was a possession of the Ottoman Empire at that time then after WWI it became controlled by the British. This is where all the modern conflict started.
Research AL Heuseini who was appointed as Gran Mufti of Jeruselem for life. He was directly seated by the British to that authority. His nephew Yasser Arafat took over his role when he died. HAMAS and the PLO are his surviving entities.
The Gran Mufti was considered a common thug by the ruling Arabs at the time before his appointment. Later he allied with Hitler, was forever banished from Jeruselem, he raised SS divisions in the Caucuses, was found guilty of war crimes in Yugoslavia after WWII, at the Nuremburg trials testimony was given that he was a close confidant of Himmler and personally toured the gas chambers at Auschwitz. He was also implicated in the asassination of King Abdulah of Jordan in 1951. A sinister character indeed.

Above is referenced from this source.
www.palestinefacts.org...

For a unique perspective from an author at the time before WWII of the situation in Palestine here is a good read. It lays heavy blame on British colonialism against both the Arabs and the Jews and bears witness to the populations peacefull attitudes and hopes and asperations towards one another.

www.twf.org...

To sum it up IMO, todays structure is the final chapters of what was started during the period before WWII and after WWI. The power structure of the Palestinians is exactly the same today. It could have been a lot different with the Palestinians living side by side with the Jews sharing mutual prosperity. When the British empire gave up control, where did the support come from for the Mufti and later Arafat and the PLO? Or Perhaps the Mufti and later Arafat solidified their control by extending networks of support throughout the world. In either case the palestinian people have no control over their own destiny and are held hostage to this power structure that is still in place.

[edit on 13-1-2009 by SectionEight]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Young Israelis and Palestinians Flash Mob for Peace
  Posted 4 days ago with 37 member flags
Zionists , Stop the War Against Iran Now!
  Posted 3 days ago with 33 member flags
Why a war with Iran is necessary should talking fail.
  Posted 19 days ago with 32 member flags
Zionist regime well within Iran missile reach: MP
  Posted 5 days ago with 25 member flags
Israel to UN: Tomorrow will be too late for action against Iran !!
  Posted 17 days ago with 22 member flags
Israel no match for Iran military might
  Posted 6 days ago with 21 member flags