
Originally posted by NavalFC
So much of what they write is either false, as one of my earliest threads debunked them
Naval you seem to have the idea that you have debunked many claims on these boards.
The problem is that debunking is nothing more then proving a theory or proposal to be false.
Debunking is the act of disproving a proposal or hypothesis.
So this requires PROOF, the same proof that you always like to demand from others. The last debunking effort I saw you undertake was suggesting that
there could not be structures on the moon because we have (amature) telescopes that would have long since detected them.
Now if that is your definition of debunking then I understand that you think you have debunked many claims on these boards...
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
The piece at the Examiner seems to be nothing more than a press-release or long-winded advertisement disguised as actual reporting.
I agree Savior that judging by the article it would seem that way. I haven't looked into it enough to be sure though. The actual site is blocked at
my work (maybe my boss expects me to actually work when I'm at the office  ).
Edit: After reading your post again I'm somewhat confused. Do you mean that this is an advertisement from Examiner or from Exopolitics?
[edit on 8/1/09 by Fastwalker81]
|